GFL Environmental Inc.
GFL Environmental Inc. (GFLU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFLU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| WM | $233.42 | +0.00% | 92.9B | 34.43 | $6.69 | +1.43% |
| RSG | $221.63 | +0.00% | 68.6B | 31.96 | $6.87 | +1.10% |
| WCN | $166.06 | +0.00% | 41.9B | 39.17 | $4.18 | +0.79% |
| CLH | $281.34 | +0.00% | 15.3B | 39.55 | $7.20 | N/A |
| GFL | $43.47 | +0.00% | 14.8B | 104.10 | $0.41 | +0.14% |
| CWST | $101.28 | +0.00% | 6B | 397.75 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| NVRI | $19.34 | +0.00% | 1.5B | -9.44 | -$2.03 | N/A |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.1B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFLU vs WM Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while WM trades at $233.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check WM's competition here
GFLU vs RSG Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while RSG trades at $221.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check RSG's competition here
GFLU vs WCN Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while WCN trades at $166.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check WCN's competition here
GFLU vs CLH Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CLH trades at $281.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CLH's competition here
GFLU vs GFL Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while GFL trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 104.10. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check GFL's competition here
GFLU vs CWST Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CWST trades at $101.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 397.75. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CWST's competition here
GFLU vs SRCL Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check SRCL's competition here
GFLU vs NVRI Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while NVRI trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check NVRI's competition here
GFLU vs HCCI Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check HCCI's competition here
GFLU vs MEG Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 816.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while MEG trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -27.51. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check MEG's competition here
GFLU vs HSC Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check HSC's competition here
GFLU vs YDDL Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while YDDL trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check YDDL's competition here
GFLU vs PESI Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 248.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while PESI trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -20.97. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check PESI's competition here
GFLU vs ESGL Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ESGL trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ESGL's competition here
GFLU vs QRHC Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while QRHC trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check QRHC's competition here
GFLU vs LICY Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to LICY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check LICY's competition here
GFLU vs JAN Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while JAN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check JAN's competition here
GFLU vs AMBI Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AMBI's competition here
GFLU vs LNZA Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while LNZA trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to LNZA's ROE of +16.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check LNZA's competition here
GFLU vs CHRA Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CHRA's competition here
GFLU vs AQMS Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AQMS trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AQMS's competition here
GFLU vs ENGS Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ENGS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ENGS's competition here
GFLU vs AWX Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AWX trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 65.38. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AWX's competition here
GFLU vs CHNR Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CHNR trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CHNR's competition here
GFLU vs GWAV Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while GWAV trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check GWAV's competition here
GFLU vs CDTG Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CDTG trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CDTG's competition here
GFLU vs DXST Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while DXST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to DXST's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check DXST's competition here
GFLU vs ECOLW Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ECOLW's competition here
GFLU vs SMED Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check SMED's competition here
GFLU vs NES Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check NES's competition here
GFLU vs CVA Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CVA's competition here
GFLU vs ECOL Comparison February 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ECOL's competition here