GFL Environmental Inc.
GFL Environmental Inc. GFLU Peers
See (GFLU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| WM | $234.37 | -0.12% | 94.3B | 35.30 | $6.64 | +1.34% |
| RSG | $248.93 | +0.18% | 77.8B | 37.72 | $6.60 | +0.91% |
| WCN | $187.71 | +0.34% | 48.5B | 77.57 | $2.42 | +0.66% |
| GFL | $49.55 | -0.02% | 17.6B | -32.18 | -$1.54 | +0.12% |
| CLH | $225.56 | -0.49% | 12.1B | 31.28 | $7.21 | N/A |
| CWST | $116.34 | +0.24% | 7.3B | 528.82 | $0.22 | N/A |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.1B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
| MEG | $23.21 | -1.74% | 794.2M | -9.96 | -$2.33 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFLU vs WM Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while WM trades at $234.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to WM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs RSG Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while RSG trades at $248.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs WCN Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while WCN trades at $187.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 77.57. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs GFL Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while GFL trades at $49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is -32.18. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs CLH Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CLH trades at $225.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs CWST Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CWST trades at $116.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 528.82. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs SRCL Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to SRCL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs HCCI Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs MEG Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 794.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while MEG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs HSC Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs NVRI Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 677.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while NVRI trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs AMBI Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AMBI trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is 36.54. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs PESI Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while PESI trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs LNZA Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while LNZA trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to LNZA's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs QRHC Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while QRHC trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs CHNR Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CHNR trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs LICY Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs JAN Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while JAN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs ENGS Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ENGS trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs CHRA Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs DXST Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while DXST trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to DXST's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs CDTG Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CDTG trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CDTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs GWAV Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while GWAV trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs AWX Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AWX trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs AQMS Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AQMS trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs ECOL Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs SMED Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs CVA Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs NES Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.
GFLU vs ECOLW Comparison
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.