GFL Environmental Inc.

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while WM trades at $233.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check WM's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while RSG trades at $221.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check RSG's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while WCN trades at $166.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL and WCN have similar daily volatility (2.08).Check WCN's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check GFLU's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while CLH trades at $281.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CLH's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while CWST trades at $101.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 397.75. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CWST's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check SRCL's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while NVRI trades at $19.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check NVRI's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check HCCI's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 816.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while MEG trades at $22.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -27.51. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check MEG's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check HSC's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while YDDL trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check YDDL's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 248.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while PESI trades at $13.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -20.97. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check PESI's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while ESGL trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check ESGL's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while QRHC trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check QRHC's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LICY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check LICY's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while JAN trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check JAN's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while AMBI trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check AMBI's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while LNZA trades at $9.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LNZA's ROE of +16.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check LNZA's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CHRA's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while AQMS trades at $4.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check AQMS's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while ENGS trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check ENGS's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while AWX trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 65.38. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check AWX's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while CHNR trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CHNR's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while GWAV trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check GWAV's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while CDTG trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CDTG's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while DXST trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DXST's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check DXST's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check SMED's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check NES's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check ECOLW's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while CVA trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CVA's competition here

GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 14.8B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $43.47, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.10, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check ECOL's competition here