Flowserve Corporation
Flowserve Corporation (FLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLS | $88.21 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 33.69 | $2.64 | +0.94% |
| ETN | $377.32 | +0.00% | 145.1B | 35.74 | $10.45 | +1.12% |
| PH | $1,012.44 | +0.00% | 129.1B | 37.36 | $27.37 | +0.71% |
| HWM | $251.30 | +0.00% | 103.9B | 69.39 | $3.72 | +0.18% |
| ITW | $293.82 | +0.00% | 86B | 28.09 | $10.50 | +2.11% |
| EMR | $151.30 | +0.00% | 83.6B | 36.43 | $4.08 | +1.46% |
| CMI | $596.91 | +0.00% | 82B | 28.95 | $20.49 | +1.32% |
| AME | $232.75 | +0.00% | 53.9B | 36.55 | $6.39 | +0.53% |
| ROK | $395.38 | +0.00% | 44.8B | 45.63 | $8.74 | +1.34% |
| HWM-P | $100.35 | -0.05% | 40.3B | 140.74 | $0.71 | +0.18% |
Stock Comparison
FLS vs ETN Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while ETN trades at $377.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ETN's competition here
FLS vs PH Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while PH trades at $1,012.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PH's competition here
FLS vs HWM Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while HWM trades at $251.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 69.39. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HWM's competition here
FLS vs ITW Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while ITW trades at $293.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ITW's competition here
FLS vs EMR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while EMR trades at $151.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check EMR's competition here
FLS vs CMI Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CMI trades at $596.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CMI's competition here
FLS vs AME Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while AME trades at $232.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AME's competition here
FLS vs ROK Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while ROK trades at $395.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ROK's competition here
FLS vs HWM-P Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while HWM-P trades at $100.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 140.74. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HWM-P's competition here
FLS vs IR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while IR trades at $96.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 65.92. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check IR's competition here
FLS vs ROP Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while ROP trades at $332.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ROP's competition here
FLS vs OTIS Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while OTIS trades at $93.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OTIS's competition here
FLS vs SYM Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while SYM trades at $55.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -489.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SYM's competition here
FLS vs DOV Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while DOV trades at $232.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check DOV's competition here
FLS vs XYL Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while XYL trades at $129.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XYL's competition here
FLS vs ITT Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while ITT trades at $204.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ITT's competition here
FLS vs PNR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while PNR trades at $100.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PNR's competition here
FLS vs NDSN Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while NDSN trades at $293.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NDSN's competition here
FLS vs IEX Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while IEX trades at $207.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check IEX's competition here
FLS vs GGG Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while GGG trades at $93.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GGG's competition here
FLS vs RRX Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while RRX trades at $213.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 51.39. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RRX's competition here
FLS vs GNRC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while GNRC trades at $227.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GNRC's competition here
FLS vs DCI Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while DCI trades at $107.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check DCI's competition here
FLS vs SPXC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while SPXC trades at $241.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SPXC's competition here
FLS vs CR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CR trades at $204.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CR's competition here
FLS vs AOS Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while AOS trades at $77.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AOS's competition here
FLS vs WTS Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while WTS trades at $329.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check WTS's competition here
FLS vs GTLS Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while GTLS trades at $206.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 238.14. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTLS's competition here
FLS vs JBTM Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while JBTM trades at $162.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -75.66. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JBTM's competition here
FLS vs MIDD Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while MIDD trades at $162.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is -40.60. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIDD's competition here
FLS vs GTES Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while GTES trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTES's competition here
FLS vs PSN Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while PSN trades at $65.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PSN's competition here
FLS vs AEBIV Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AEBIV's competition here
FLS vs NPO Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while NPO trades at $277.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 67.73. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NPO's competition here
FLS vs MIR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while MIR trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 193.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIR's competition here
FLS vs CSW Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CSW trades at $310.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CSW's competition here
FLS vs CSWI Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CSWI's competition here
FLS vs MWA Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while MWA trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MWA's competition here
FLS vs FELE Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while FELE trades at $94.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check FELE's competition here
FLS vs AIMC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AIMC's competition here
FLS vs KAI Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while KAI trades at $327.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KAI's competition here
FLS vs JBT Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JBT's competition here
FLS vs GTLS-PB Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
FLS vs ATS Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while ATS trades at $32.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 234.64. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ATS's competition here
FLS vs SXI Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while SXI trades at $255.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 57.76. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SXI's competition here
FLS vs CXT Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CXT trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CXT's competition here
FLS vs XMTR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while XMTR trades at $58.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -45.34. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XMTR's competition here
FLS vs HLIO Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while HLIO trades at $73.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 73.61. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HLIO's competition here
FLS vs HI Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HI's competition here
FLS vs EPAC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while EPAC trades at $42.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check EPAC's competition here
FLS vs CFX Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CFX's competition here
FLS vs CYD Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CYD trades at $54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CYD's competition here
FLS vs SHPW Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHPW's competition here
FLS vs PSIX Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while PSIX trades at $84.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PSIX's competition here
FLS vs BW-PA Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while BW-PA trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 68.46. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BW-PA's competition here
FLS vs GRC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while GRC trades at $64.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GRC's competition here
FLS vs THR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while THR trades at $50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check THR's competition here
FLS vs AMSC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while AMSC trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AMSC's competition here
FLS vs TNC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while TNC trades at $83.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TNC's competition here
FLS vs ENOV Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while ENOV trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ENOV's competition here
FLS vs CIR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CIR's competition here
FLS vs NNE Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while NNE trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NNE's competition here
FLS vs BW Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 969.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while BW trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BW's competition here
FLS vs GHM Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 897.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while GHM trades at $79.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 60.07. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GHM's competition here
FLS vs KRNT Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 698.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while KRNT trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KRNT's competition here
FLS vs BLDP Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 634.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while BLDP trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BLDP's competition here
FLS vs SERV Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 527.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while SERV trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SERV's competition here
FLS vs RR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 479.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while RR trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -20.08. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RR's competition here
FLS vs LXFR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 418.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while LXFR trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LXFR's competition here
FLS vs PKOH Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while PKOH trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PKOH's competition here
FLS vs OFLX Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while OFLX trades at $36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OFLX's competition here
FLS vs BGRY Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BGRY's competition here
FLS vs SHMD Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while SHMD trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHMD's competition here
FLS vs TAYD Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while TAYD trades at $84.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TAYD's competition here
FLS vs TWIN Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while TWIN trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TWIN's competition here
FLS vs HUHU Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while HUHU trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HUHU's competition here
FLS vs NPWR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 164.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while NPWR trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NPWR's competition here
FLS vs HURC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while HURC trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HURC's competition here
FLS vs SHMDW Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while SHMDW trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHMDW's competition here
FLS vs PYR Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PYR's competition here
FLS vs XCH Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while XCH trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XCH's ROE of +45.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XCH's competition here
FLS vs BWEN Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while BWEN trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BWEN's competition here
FLS vs BURU Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while BURU trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BURU's competition here
FLS vs CVV Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CVV trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -130.00. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CVV's competition here
FLS vs LBGJ Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while LBGJ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LBGJ's competition here
FLS vs GTEC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while GTEC trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTEC's competition here
FLS vs LASE Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while LASE trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LASE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LASE's competition here
FLS vs WFF Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while WFF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check WFF's competition here
FLS vs HCAI Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while HCAI trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HCAI's competition here
FLS vs CGRN Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGRN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CGRN's competition here
FLS vs TPIC Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while TPIC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TPIC's competition here
FLS vs INLF Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while INLF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check INLF's competition here
FLS vs JCSE Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while JCSE trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JCSE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JCSE's competition here
FLS vs CETY Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CETY trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CETY's competition here
FLS vs AIOS Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AIOS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while AIOS trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas AIOS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIOS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AIOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AIOS's competition here
FLS vs NMHI Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 157.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while NMHI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NMHI's competition here
FLS vs NMHIW Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 76K. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while NMHIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NMHIW's competition here
FLS vs RAVN Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RAVN's competition here
FLS vs CFXA Comparison February 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $88.21, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.69, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CFXA's competition here