First High-School Education Group Co., Ltd.
First High-School Education Group Co., Ltd. (FHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHS | $0.28 | +23.10% | 0 | 0.55 | $0.50 | N/A |
| EDU | $47.09 | +0.88% | 7.7B | 20.57 | $2.30 | +1.22% |
| TAL | $10.34 | +3.35% | 6.2B | 73.29 | $0.14 | N/A |
| LRN | $129.09 | -0.65% | 5.6B | 20.13 | $6.38 | N/A |
| LOPE | $166.95 | -1.00% | 4.7B | 21.00 | $7.96 | N/A |
| ATGE | $114.45 | -0.58% | 4.1B | 19.25 | $5.91 | N/A |
| GHC | $919.68 | +0.10% | 4B | 6.49 | $141.12 | +0.78% |
| LAUR | $23.05 | -0.97% | 3.4B | 12.38 | $1.86 | N/A |
| COUR | $12.16 | -1.70% | 2B | -37.86 | -$0.33 | N/A |
| STRA | $79.01 | +0.77% | 1.9B | 16.86 | $4.68 | +3.05% |
Stock Comparison
FHS vs EDU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while EDU trades at $47.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check EDU's competition here
FHS vs TAL Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while TAL trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 73.29. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check TAL's competition here
FHS vs LRN Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while LRN trades at $129.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check LRN's competition here
FHS vs LOPE Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while LOPE trades at $166.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check LOPE's competition here
FHS vs ATGE Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while ATGE trades at $114.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check ATGE's competition here
FHS vs GHC Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while GHC trades at $919.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check GHC's competition here
FHS vs LAUR Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while LAUR trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check LAUR's competition here
FHS vs COUR Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while COUR trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -37.86. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check COUR's competition here
FHS vs STRA Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while STRA trades at $79.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check STRA's competition here
FHS vs PRDO Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while PRDO trades at $28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check PRDO's competition here
FHS vs UTI Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while UTI trades at $31.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check UTI's competition here
FHS vs GOTU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while GOTU trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check GOTU's competition here
FHS vs AFYA Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while AFYA trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check AFYA's competition here
FHS vs KLC Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while KLC trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check KLC's competition here
FHS vs UDMY Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while UDMY trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check UDMY's competition here
FHS vs DAO Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while DAO trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 50.88. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check DAO's competition here
FHS vs ARCE Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check ARCE's competition here
FHS vs REDU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check REDU's competition here
FHS vs LINC Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while LINC trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 57.62. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check LINC's competition here
FHS vs APEI Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 512.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while APEI trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check APEI's competition here
FHS vs QSG Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while QSG trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check QSG's competition here
FHS vs VSTA Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 323.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while VSTA trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check VSTA's competition here
FHS vs VTRU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to VTRU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check VTRU's competition here
FHS vs CHGG Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 158.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while CHGG trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHGG's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check CHGG's competition here
FHS vs STG Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while STG trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to STG's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check STG's competition here
FHS vs LGCY Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 136.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while LGCY trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to LGCY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check LGCY's competition here
FHS vs SKIL Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while SKIL trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check SKIL's competition here
FHS vs GNS Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while GNS trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check GNS's competition here
FHS vs RYET Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while RYET trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -64.67. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to RYET's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check RYET's competition here
FHS vs ONE Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to ONE's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check ONE's competition here
FHS vs KIDZ Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while KIDZ trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check KIDZ's competition here
FHS vs JZ Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while JZ trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to JZ's ROE of -846.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check JZ's competition here
FHS vs IH Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while IH trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check IH's competition here
FHS vs BTCT Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while BTCT trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check BTCT's competition here
FHS vs AIU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check AIU's competition here
FHS vs GEHI Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check GEHI's competition here
FHS vs YQ Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while YQ trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check YQ's competition here
FHS vs AACG Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while AACG trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check AACG's competition here
FHS vs EDTK Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while EDTK trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check EDTK's competition here
FHS vs BEDU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while BEDU trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check BEDU's competition here
FHS vs VSA Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while VSA trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check VSA's competition here
FHS vs TEDU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check TEDU's competition here
FHS vs VEDU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check VEDU's competition here
FHS vs EEIQ Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while EEIQ trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check EEIQ's competition here
FHS vs GV Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while GV trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check GV's competition here
FHS vs WAFU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while WAFU trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check WAFU's competition here
FHS vs GSUN Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while GSUN trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check GSUN's competition here
FHS vs TCTM Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check TCTM's competition here
FHS vs TWOU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to TWOU's ROE of -14.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check TWOU's competition here
FHS vs CLEU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while CLEU trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check CLEU's competition here
FHS vs MYND Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while MYND trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check MYND's competition here
FHS vs FEDU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while FEDU trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 245.67. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check FEDU's competition here
FHS vs METX Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check METX's competition here
FHS vs COE Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while COE trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to COE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check COE's competition here
FHS vs KIDZW Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while KIDZW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIDZW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check KIDZW's competition here
FHS vs ASPU Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while ASPU trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check ASPU's competition here
FHS vs RYB Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check RYB's competition here
FHS vs LXEH Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 874.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while LXEH trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check LXEH's competition here
FHS vs AMBO Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 414.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while AMBO trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check AMBO's competition here
FHS vs BTCTW Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check BTCTW's competition here
FHS vs NEW Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check NEW's competition here
FHS vs ZME Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check ZME's competition here
FHS vs HMHC Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check HMHC's competition here
FHS vs ZVO Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check ZVO's competition here
FHS vs GPX Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check GPX's competition here
FHS vs HLG Comparison July 2025
FHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS stands at 0. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FHS is priced at $0.28, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.55, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FHS's ROE is N/A, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.Check HLG's competition here