Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EPAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | $38.80 | +3.49% | 2.1B | 23.84 | $1.61 | +0.10% |
| ETN | $392.00 | +1.84% | 153.5B | 39.66 | $9.89 | +1.01% |
| PH | $739.22 | +1.32% | 94.3B | 28.43 | $25.97 | +0.91% |
| EMR | $149.21 | +1.62% | 84.2B | 43.25 | $3.46 | +1.41% |
| ITW | $261.24 | -0.23% | 76.7B | 23.04 | $11.36 | +2.29% |
| HWM | $187.61 | +0.43% | 76.5B | 61.93 | $3.06 | +0.19% |
| ROP | $561.53 | +0.21% | 60.5B | 39.57 | $14.23 | +0.57% |
| CMI | $368.31 | +0.83% | 50.9B | 18.20 | $20.31 | +1.98% |
| AME | $179.61 | -0.06% | 41.5B | 29.45 | $6.11 | +0.66% |
| ROK | $356.38 | -0.18% | 40.4B | 45.23 | $7.93 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
EPAC vs ETN Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while ETN trades at $392.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ETN's competition here
EPAC vs PH Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while PH trades at $739.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PH's competition here
EPAC vs EMR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while EMR trades at $149.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check EMR's competition here
EPAC vs ITW Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while ITW trades at $261.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ITW's competition here
EPAC vs HWM Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while HWM trades at $187.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 61.93. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC and HWM have similar daily volatility (1.62).Check HWM's competition here
EPAC vs ROP Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while ROP trades at $561.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ROP's competition here
EPAC vs CMI Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CMI trades at $368.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CMI's competition here
EPAC vs AME Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while AME trades at $179.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AME's competition here
EPAC vs ROK Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while ROK trades at $356.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ROK's competition here
EPAC vs B Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while B trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check B's competition here
EPAC vs IR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while IR trades at $88.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check IR's competition here
EPAC vs OTIS Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while OTIS trades at $88.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OTIS's competition here
EPAC vs XYL Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while XYL trades at $132.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XYL's competition here
EPAC vs HWM-P Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while HWM-P trades at $69.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 96.80. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HWM-P's competition here
EPAC vs DOV Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while DOV trades at $186.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check DOV's competition here
EPAC vs PNR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while PNR trades at $102.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PNR's competition here
EPAC vs IEX Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while IEX trades at $185.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check IEX's competition here
EPAC vs GGG Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while GGG trades at $84.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GGG's competition here
EPAC vs ITT Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while ITT trades at $161.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ITT's competition here
EPAC vs NDSN Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while NDSN trades at $220.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NDSN's competition here
EPAC vs CR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CR trades at $190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CR's competition here
EPAC vs RRX Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while RRX trades at $158.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RRX's competition here
EPAC vs AOS Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while AOS trades at $71.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AOS's competition here
EPAC vs GNRC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while GNRC trades at $156.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GNRC's competition here
EPAC vs SPXC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while SPXC trades at $181.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SPXC's competition here
EPAC vs WTS Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while WTS trades at $251.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check WTS's competition here
EPAC vs DCI Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while DCI trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check DCI's competition here
EPAC vs PSN Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while PSN trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PSN's competition here
EPAC vs MIDD Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while MIDD trades at $150.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIDD's competition here
EPAC vs GTLS Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while GTLS trades at $171.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTLS's competition here
EPAC vs JBTM Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while JBTM trades at $138.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -96.51. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JBTM's competition here
EPAC vs FLS Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while FLS trades at $54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FLS's competition here
EPAC vs GTES Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while GTES trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTES's competition here
EPAC vs MIR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while MIR trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -438.70. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIR's competition here
EPAC vs CSWI Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CSWI's competition here
EPAC vs NPO Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while NPO trades at $209.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 52.03. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NPO's competition here
EPAC vs FELE Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while FELE trades at $92.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FELE's competition here
EPAC vs KAI Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while KAI trades at $345.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KAI's competition here
EPAC vs AIMC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AIMC's competition here
EPAC vs JBT Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JBT's competition here
EPAC vs MWA Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while MWA trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MWA's competition here
EPAC vs CXT Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CXT trades at $59.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CXT's competition here
EPAC vs ATS Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while ATS trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -153.14. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ATS's competition here
EPAC vs GTLS-PB Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while GTLS-PB trades at $62.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
EPAC vs CFX Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CFX's competition here
EPAC vs PSIX Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while PSIX trades at $85.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PSIX's competition here
EPAC vs SHPW Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHPW's competition here
EPAC vs SXI Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while SXI trades at $164.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SXI's competition here
EPAC vs AMSC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while AMSC trades at $42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AMSC's competition here
EPAC vs NNE Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while NNE trades at $38.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -43.16. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NNE's competition here
EPAC vs XMTR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while XMTR trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -32.95. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XMTR's competition here
EPAC vs ENOV Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while ENOV trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ENOV's competition here
EPAC vs HI Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while HI trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HI's competition here
EPAC vs TNC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while TNC trades at $82.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TNC's competition here
EPAC vs HLIO Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while HLIO trades at $37.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HLIO's competition here
EPAC vs CIR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CIR's competition here
EPAC vs GRC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while GRC trades at $41.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GRC's competition here
EPAC vs KRNT Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 992.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while KRNT trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -121.61. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KRNT's competition here
EPAC vs BW-PA Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 958.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while BW-PA trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BW-PA's competition here
EPAC vs THR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 934.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while THR trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check THR's competition here
EPAC vs CYD Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 878.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CYD trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CYD's competition here
EPAC vs SERV Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 665.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while SERV trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SERV's competition here
EPAC vs BLDP Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 637.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while BLDP trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BLDP's competition here
EPAC vs GHM Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 602.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while GHM trades at $54.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 49.45. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GHM's competition here
EPAC vs OFLX Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while OFLX trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OFLX's competition here
EPAC vs BGRY Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BGRY's competition here
EPAC vs LXFR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 328.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while LXFR trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LXFR's competition here
EPAC vs SIMA Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 319.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while SIMA trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SIMA's competition here
EPAC vs PKOH Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while PKOH trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PKOH's competition here
EPAC vs RR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 230.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while RR trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RR's competition here
EPAC vs NPWR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while NPWR trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NPWR's competition here
EPAC vs TAYD Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while TAYD trades at $46.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TAYD's competition here
EPAC vs HURC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while HURC trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HURC's competition here
EPAC vs HUHU Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while HUHU trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -59.69. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HUHU's competition here
EPAC vs TWIN Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while TWIN trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TWIN's competition here
EPAC vs SHMD Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while SHMD trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHMD's competition here
EPAC vs BW Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while BW trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BW's competition here
EPAC vs XCH Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while XCH trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XCH's competition here
EPAC vs PYR Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PYR's competition here
EPAC vs BWEN Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while BWEN trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BWEN's competition here
EPAC vs LASE Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while LASE trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LASE's competition here
EPAC vs TPIC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while TPIC trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TPIC's competition here
EPAC vs GTEC Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while GTEC trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTEC's competition here
EPAC vs WFF Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while WFF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check WFF's competition here
EPAC vs HCAI Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while HCAI trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HCAI's competition here
EPAC vs LBGJ Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while LBGJ trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -23.68. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LBGJ's competition here
EPAC vs CVV Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CVV trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -373.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CVV's competition here
EPAC vs BURU Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while BURU trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BURU's competition here
EPAC vs INLF Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while INLF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check INLF's competition here
EPAC vs CETY Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CETY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CETY's competition here
EPAC vs SHMDW Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while SHMDW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHMDW's competition here
EPAC vs CGRN Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CGRN's competition here
EPAC vs JCSE Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while JCSE trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JCSE's competition here
EPAC vs NMHI Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while NMHI trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NMHI's competition here
EPAC vs NMHIW Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 112.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NMHIW's competition here
EPAC vs WBT Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check WBT's competition here
EPAC vs BGRYW Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BGRYW's competition here
EPAC vs CFXA Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CFXA's competition here
EPAC vs RAVN Comparison July 2025
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $38.80, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.84, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RAVN's competition here