CVD Equipment Corporation

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while ETN trades at $347.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check ETN's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while PH trades at $752.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check PH's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while ITW trades at $269.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check ITW's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while EMR trades at $133.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check EMR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while HWM trades at $171.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 49.99. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check HWM's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while ROP trades at $536.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check ROP's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CMI trades at $402.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CMI's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while B trades at $26.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check B's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while AME trades at $186.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check AME's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while ROK trades at $351.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 41.23. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check ROK's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while XYL trades at $143.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check XYL's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while OTIS trades at $88.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check OTIS's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while IR trades at $80.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check IR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while HWM-P trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 98.18. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check HWM-P's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while DOV trades at $183.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check DOV's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while PNR trades at $108.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check PNR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while GGG trades at $87.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check GGG's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while ITT trades at $170.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check ITT's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while NDSN trades at $227.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check NDSN's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while IEX trades at $168.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check IEX's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while GNRC trades at $194.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check GNRC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CR trades at $194.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 37.71. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while AOS trades at $73.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check AOS's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while RRX trades at $154.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check RRX's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while WTS trades at $280.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check WTS's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while SPXC trades at $190.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check SPXC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while GTLS trades at $197.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check GTLS's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while DCI trades at $75.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check DCI's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while PSN trades at $79.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check PSN's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while JBTM trades at $147.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -63.95. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check JBTM's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while FLS trades at $53.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check FLS's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while MIDD trades at $137.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check MIDD's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while GTES trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check GTES's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CSWI's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while NPO trades at $227.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 57.28. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check NPO's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while MIR trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 416.50. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check MIR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while FELE trades at $99.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check FELE's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while MWA trades at $27.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check MWA's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check AIMC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while KAI trades at $340.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check KAI's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check JBT's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CXT trades at $63.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CXT's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while GTLS-PB trades at $71.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while ATS trades at $27.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -94.93. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check ATS's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while SXI trades at $210.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check SXI's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while XMTR trades at $49.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -40.04. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check XMTR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while EPAC trades at $43.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check EPAC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while AMSC trades at $50.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 126.70. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check AMSC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CFX's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while PSIX trades at $91.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check PSIX's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check SHPW's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while HI trades at $26.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -89.97. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check HI's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while HLIO trades at $54.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check HLIO's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while ENOV trades at $31.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check ENOV's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while TNC trades at $83.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check TNC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while NNE trades at $31.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -32.97. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check NNE's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while BW-PA trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check BW-PA's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CYD trades at $31.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CYD's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CIR trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CIR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while GRC trades at $42.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check GRC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 882.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while THR trades at $26.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check THR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 707.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while KRNT trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -62.40. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check KRNT's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 602.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while BLDP trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check BLDP's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while SERV trades at $9.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check SERV's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 552.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while GHM trades at $50.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check GHM's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while OFLX trades at $36.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check OFLX's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 351.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while LXFR trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check LXFR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check BGRY's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while SIMA trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check SIMA's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while PKOH trades at $19.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check PKOH's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while RR trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check RR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while NPWR trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check NPWR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 173.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while BW trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check BW's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while TWIN trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is -78.36. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TWIN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check TWIN's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while TAYD trades at $47.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check TAYD's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while HUHU trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -66.90. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check HUHU's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while HURC trades at $18.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check HURC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 112M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while SHMD trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check SHMD's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while LASE trades at $5.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -16.35. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check LASE's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while XCH trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check XCH's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while PYR trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check PYR's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while BWEN trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check BWEN's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while WFF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check WFF's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while GTEC trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check GTEC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while LBGJ trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check LBGJ's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while HCAI trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check HCAI's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while INLF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check INLF's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CETY trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CETY's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while BURU trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check BURU's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while SHMDW trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check SHMDW's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CGRN trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CGRN's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while TPIC trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check TPIC's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while JCSE trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check JCSE's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while NMHI trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check NMHI's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 92K. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while NMHIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check NMHIW's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while CFXA trades at $177.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFXA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check CFXA's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check BGRYW's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while WBT trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check WBT's competition here

CVV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVV stands at 20M. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVV is priced at $2.91, while RAVN trades at $58.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVV currently has a P/E ratio of -58.20, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVV's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVV is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVV.Check RAVN's competition here