Covanta Holding Corporation
Covanta Holding Corporation CVA Peers
See (CVA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVA | $20.26 | +0.10% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WM | $225.61 | -3.07% | 90.79B | 33.98 | $6.64 | +1.37% |
| RSG | $241.31 | -2.92% | 75.41B | 36.45 | $6.62 | +0.94% |
| WCN | $186.53 | -4.49% | 48.20B | 77.08 | $2.42 | +0.66% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 24.98B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| GFL | $48.68 | -1.95% | 17.28B | -31.82 | -$1.53 | +0.12% |
| CLH | $228.74 | +1.36% | 12.26B | 31.73 | $7.21 | N/A |
| CWST | $113.24 | -4.44% | 7.07B | 514.73 | $0.22 | N/A |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.75B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.11B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CVA vs WM Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 90.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while WM trades at $225.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs RSG Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 75.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while RSG trades at $241.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 36.45. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs WCN Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 48.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while WCN trades at $186.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 77.08. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs GFLU Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 24.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs GFL Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 17.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GFL trades at $48.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is -31.82. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs CLH Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 12.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CLH trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs CWST Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CWST trades at $113.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 514.73. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs SRCL Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRCL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs HCCI Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs HSC Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs MEG Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 662.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while MEG trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs NVRI Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 600.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while NVRI trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs AMBI Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 254.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AMBI trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is 35.38. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs PESI Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 174.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while PESI trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs QRHC Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while QRHC trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs LNZA Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 45.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while LNZA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs ENGS Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 40.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ENGS trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -28.40. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ENGS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs LICY Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs JAN Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while JAN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JAN's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs CHRA Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs DXST Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 18.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while DXST trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DXST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs GWAV Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 13.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GWAV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs AWX Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AWX trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs AQMS Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 8.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AQMS trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs CDTG Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CDTG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.
CVA vs CHNR Comparison
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at N/A. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CHNR trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.