Covanta Holding Corporation

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while WM trades at $229.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check WM's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while RSG trades at $220.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check RSG's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while WCN trades at $165.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check WCN's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GFLU's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CLH trades at $284.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CLH's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GFL trades at $42.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 103.10. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GFL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check SRCL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CWST trades at $91.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 382.79. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CWST's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while NVRI trades at $17.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check NVRI's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check HCCI's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while MEG trades at $22.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -26.93. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check MEG's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check HSC's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 301.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while YDDL trades at $6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 45.53. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check YDDL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 240.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while PESI trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -20.31. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check PESI's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 130.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ESGL trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -51.33. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ESGL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while QRHC trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check QRHC's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LICY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check LICY's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while JAN trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check JAN's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AMBI trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AMBI's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CHRA's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while LNZA trades at $8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNZA's ROE of +16.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check LNZA's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AQMS trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AQMS's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ENGS trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ENGS's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AWX trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AWX's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CHNR trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CHNR's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GWAV trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GWAV's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CDTG trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CDTG's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while DXST trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DXST's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check DXST's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ECOL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check SMED's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ECOLW's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check NES's competition here