Carter's Inc. (CRI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while AMZN trades at $242.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check AMZN's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 230.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BABA trades at $98.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BABA's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while MELI trades at $1,746.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 44.80. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check MELI's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while ORLY trades at $92.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check ORLY's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while SE trades at $102.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check SE's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while AZO trades at $3,222.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check AZO's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while EBAY trades at $113.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check EBAY's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while JD trades at $26.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check JD's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while CPNG trades at $18.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -192.89. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check CPNG's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while CASY trades at $784.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check CASY's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while WSM trades at $231.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check WSM's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while ULTA trades at $454.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check ULTA's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while DKS trades at $230.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check DKS's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while TSCO trades at $32.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check TSCO's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while GPC trades at $119.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check GPC's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BBY trades at $77.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BBY's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while W trades at $95.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas W's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check W's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while MUSA trades at $558.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check MUSA's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while GME trades at $22.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check GME's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while CHWY trades at $20.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check CHWY's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while ETSY trades at $75.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check ETSY's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while VIPS trades at $13.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check VIPS's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while GLBE trades at $35.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 53.43. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check GLBE's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BBWI trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BBWI's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while MNSO trades at $12.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check MNSO's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while AAP trades at $62.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check AAP's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while ABG trades at $201.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check ABG's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while RH trades at $165.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 39.26. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check RH's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while ASO trades at $47.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check ASO's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check OZON's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BOBS trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BOBS's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while RVLV trades at $23.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check RVLV's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while SVV trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check SVV's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while EYE trades at $19.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check EYE's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while RERE trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check RERE's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while OLPX trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.25. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check OLPX's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while SBH trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check SBH's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check TA's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while EVGOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check EVGOW's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while LQDT trades at $39.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check LQDT's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check TANNI's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 923.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while HEPS trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check HEPS's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 900.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while ARKO trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check ARKO's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 883.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while TDUP trades at $6.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -52.69. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check TDUP's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check ODP's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 807.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while HZO trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 130.93. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check HZO's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 776.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while WOOF trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check WOOF's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check OSTK's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 670.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BWMX trades at $18.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BWMX's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 590.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while EVGO trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check EVGO's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BYON's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check DADA's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while JMIA trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check JMIA's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 430.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BBBY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BBBY's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BNED trades at $12.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.38. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BNED's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while HNST trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is 68.04. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check HNST's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 383.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BBW trades at $30.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BBW's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while ZKH trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check ZKH's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while NEGG trades at $16.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -24.07. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check NEGG's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while LE trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check LE's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 296.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while YSG trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -24.77. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check YSG's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check FTCH's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 221.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while FLWS trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check FLWS's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check QRTEA's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while DIBS trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check DIBS's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BZUN trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BZUN's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while CHPT trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check CHPT's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check VLTA's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check JMG's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check QRTEP's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check GOED's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check APRN's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while GRWG trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check GRWG's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BARK trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BARK's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while HOUR trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 61.33. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check HOUR's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check OTH's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NXB has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while NXB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas NXB's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NXB's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to NXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check NXB's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while NPT trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -60.25. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check NPT's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while PRTS trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check PRTS's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while SPWH trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check SPWH's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check QRTEB's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check CTIB's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check KIRK's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check SSU's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BGFV's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check DTC's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while LITB trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check LITB's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while TBHC trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check TBHC's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check QVCGP's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while NHTC trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -16.28. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check NHTC's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while TLF trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check TLF's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check BOXD's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while MOGU trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check MOGU's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while TCS trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check TCS's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while CGTL trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check CGTL's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while YJ trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check YJ's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TKAT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while TKAT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas TKAT's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKAT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to TKAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check TKAT's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JWEL has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while JWEL trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas JWEL's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JWEL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is less volatile compared to JWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check JWEL's competition here

CRI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRI stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PIK has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRI is priced at $41.16, while PIK trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.86, whereas PIK's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CRI's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PIK's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRI is more volatile compared to PIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRI.Check PIK's competition here