PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while AMZN trades at $251.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check AMZN's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 253.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BABA trades at $105.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BABA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while PDD trades at $75.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check PDD's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while MELI trades at $1,696.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 46.14. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check MELI's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ORLY trades at $84.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ORLY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while SE trades at $95.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check SE's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while EBAY trades at $106.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check EBAY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while AZO trades at $2,792.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check AZO's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while JD trades at $25.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check JD's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while WSM trades at $232.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check WSM's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while CPNG trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -32.03. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check CPNG's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ULTA trades at $543.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ULTA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while CASY trades at $617.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check CASY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BBY trades at $87.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BBY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while TSCO trades at $31.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check TSCO's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while W trades at $101.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas W's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to W. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check W's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while FIVE trades at $221.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check FIVE's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while DKS trades at $136.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check DKS's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while GME trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check GME's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while MUSA trades at $515.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check MUSA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while CHWY trades at $18.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check CHWY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ETSY trades at $72.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ETSY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while GLBE trades at $39.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check GLBE's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while VIPS trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check VIPS's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while WRBY trades at $27.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 84.50. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check WRBY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BBWI trades at $16.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BBWI's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ASO trades at $48.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ASO's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while MNSO trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check MNSO's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check OZON's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while AAP trades at $38.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check AAP's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while RH trades at $120.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to RH's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check RH's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BOBS trades at $14.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BOBS's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while SBH trades at $16.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check SBH's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while RVLV trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check RVLV's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ARHS trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ARHS's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while SVV trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check SVV's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while OLPX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check OLPX's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while LQDT trades at $43.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check LQDT's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while RERE trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check RERE's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while EYE trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check EYE's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check TA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while HZO trades at $52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 187.00. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check HZO's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while WINA trades at $297.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check WINA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check TANNI's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ODP's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 774M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while HEPS trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check HEPS's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check OSTK's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 625.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while WOOF trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check WOOF's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 611.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BWMX trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BWMX's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BYON's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check DADA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 467.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ARKO trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 56.58. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ARKO's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 437.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ZKH trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -69.77. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ZKH's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while EVGO trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check EVGO's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 429.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while JMIA trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check JMIA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 406.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BNED trades at $11.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BNED's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 324.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BBBY trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BBBY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 320.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BBW trades at $25.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BBW's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 315.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ELA trades at $12.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to ELA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ELA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while TDUP trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check TDUP's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check FTCH's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 241M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while NEGG trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check NEGG's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while CHPT trades at $9.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -48.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check CHPT's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check QRTEA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, NXH has a market cap of 188.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while NXH trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas NXH's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to NXH's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to NXH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check NXH's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BZUN trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BZUN's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while HTLM trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check HTLM's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 163.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while FLWS trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check FLWS's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 163.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ONEW trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ONEW's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check VLTA's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while DIBS trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -18.27. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check DIBS's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check JMG's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check QRTEP's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check GOED's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while PLBY trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check PLBY's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ABLV trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ABLV's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check APRN's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while GRWG trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check GRWG's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BARK trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BARK's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while PRTS trades at $8.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check PRTS's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while HOUR trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check HOUR's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check OTH's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, PEW-WT has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while PEW-WT trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PEW-WT's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PEW-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to PEW-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check PEW-WT's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while PEW trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to PEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check PEW's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check QRTEB's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check CTIB's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while SPWH trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check SPWH's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check ABLVW's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check KIRK's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check SSU's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BBBYW has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BBBYW trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BBBYW's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BBBYW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BBBYW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BBBYW's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BGFV's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check DTC's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while LITB trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to LITB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check LITB's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check QVCGP's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while TLF trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check TLF's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while MOGU trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 202.06. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to MOGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is more volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check MOGU's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check BOXD's competition here

PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PETS stands at 29.1M. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PETS is priced at $1.36 on the NASDAQ, while TCS trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PETS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PETS's ROE is -1.09%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PETS is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PETS.Check TCS's competition here