Conn's, Inc.
Conn's, Inc. CONN Peers
See (CONN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONN | $0.10 | -46.40% | 2.43M | -0.03 | -$3.17 | N/A |
| AMZN | $205.59 | +0.20% | 2.18T | 33.54 | $6.13 | N/A |
| BABA | $123.48 | -0.34% | 295.66B | 13.60 | $9.08 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,584.92 | -0.06% | 131.05B | 68.69 | $37.63 | N/A |
| SE | $161.42 | -1.95% | 94.72B | 111.32 | $1.45 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,381.66 | +0.84% | 78.74B | 33.31 | $41.48 | N/A |
| CVNA | $299.72 | +0.78% | 64.18B | 104.07 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,784.76 | +0.70% | 63.31B | 25.45 | $148.73 | N/A |
| JD | $33.55 | -2.33% | 51.44B | 8.52 | $3.94 | +2.90% |
| CPNG | $27.25 | +1.53% | 49.48B | 194.64 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CONN vs AMZN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.18T. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AMZN trades at $205.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BABA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 295.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BABA trades at $123.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MELI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 131.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MELI trades at $2,584.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 68.69. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 94.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SE trades at $161.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 111.32. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ORLY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ORLY trades at $1,381.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CVNA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 64.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CVNA trades at $299.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 104.07. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AZO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 63.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AZO trades at $3,784.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 51.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JD trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CPNG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 49.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CPNG trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 194.64. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs PDD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 42.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while PDD trades at $117.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs VIPS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 39.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while VIPS trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EBAY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 33.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EBAY trades at $71.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TSCO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 28.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TSCO trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FIVE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 23.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FIVE trades at $106.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WSM Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WSM trades at $173.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ULTA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 18.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ULTA trades at $412.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GPC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GPC trades at $128.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CHWY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CHWY trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 45.40. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CASY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CASY trades at $456.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBY trades at $73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DKS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DKS trades at $184.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GME Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 12.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GME trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 86.33. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CART Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CART trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MUSA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MUSA trades at $457.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBWI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBWI trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGP trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GLBE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GLBE trades at $33.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -73.42. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs W Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while W trades at $39.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas W's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ETSY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ETSY trades at $47.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RH trades at $210.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 57.95. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ASO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ASO trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OZON Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AAP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AAP trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SVV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SVV trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 72.07. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MNSO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MNSO trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EYE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EYE trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -60.06. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WINA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WINA trades at $424.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RVLV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RVLV trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EVGOW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EVGOW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EVGO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EVGO trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TANNI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RERE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 935.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RERE trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is -56.20. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SBH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 925.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SBH trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WOOF Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 923.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WOOF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HEPS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 873.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HEPS trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OLPX Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 859.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OLPX trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TDUP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 845.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TDUP trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -24.66. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OSTK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LQDT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 765.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LQDT trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HNST Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 607.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HNST trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -275.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ARKO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 592.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ARKO trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 173.33. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 558.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBW trades at $42.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ODP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 548.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ODP trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HZO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 503.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HZO trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BYON Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 388.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BYON trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BNED Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 373.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BNED trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BWMX Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 363.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BWMX trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -48.70. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CHPT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 327.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CHPT trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FLWS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 295.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FLWS trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 292.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LE trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 47.35. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FTCH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BARK-WT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 227.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BARK-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BARK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 225.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BARK trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LOGC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 205.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LOGC trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BZUN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 204.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BZUN trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JMIA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 196.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JMIA trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AKA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 150.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AKA trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs VLTA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 149.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WBUY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 146.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WBUY trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DADA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 132.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DADA trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GOED Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs NEGG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 120.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NEGG trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OCG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 109.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OCG trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs APRN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 99.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to APRN's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 92.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGB trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DIBS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 89.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DIBS trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SPWH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 76.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SPWH trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GRWG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 67.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GRWG trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs NHTC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 54.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NHTC trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 119.25. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CTIB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs PRTS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 46.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while PRTS trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HOUR Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 45.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HOUR trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 130.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBBY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 41.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 40.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SSU Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BGFV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 31.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BGFV trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs KIRK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while KIRK trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TLF Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 24.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TLF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs YSG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 23.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while YSG trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CGTL Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 23.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CGTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JBDI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 19.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JBDI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -20.20. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JBDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs IPW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 16.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while IPW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ZOOZ Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 16.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ZOOZ trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BOXD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ZKH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ZKH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.