Conn's, Inc.
Conn's, Inc. CONN Peers
See (CONN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONN | $0.10 | -46.40% | 2.4M | -0.03 | -$3.17 | N/A |
| AMZN | $216.17 | +1.92% | 2.3T | 35.26 | $6.13 | N/A |
| BABA | $115.97 | +2.75% | 279.7B | 12.79 | $9.07 | +1.70% |
| PDD | $102.79 | +2.20% | 145.9B | 11.04 | $9.31 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,454.76 | +3.49% | 124.4B | 60.52 | $40.56 | N/A |
| SE | $158.26 | +2.51% | 93.7B | 111.45 | $1.42 | N/A |
| ORLY | $88.12 | -1.99% | 75.3B | 33.00 | $2.67 | N/A |
| CVNA | $290.20 | -2.30% | 62.1B | 100.76 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,602.80 | -1.09% | 60.3B | 24.42 | $147.53 | N/A |
| CPNG | $28.35 | +0.87% | 51.5B | 202.46 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CONN vs AMZN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AMZN trades at $216.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BABA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 279.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BABA trades at $115.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs PDD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while PDD trades at $102.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MELI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MELI trades at $2,454.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 60.52. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SE trades at $158.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 111.45. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ORLY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ORLY trades at $88.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CVNA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CVNA trades at $290.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 100.76. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AZO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AZO trades at $3,602.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CPNG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CPNG trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 202.46. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JD trades at $33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs VIPS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while VIPS trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EBAY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EBAY trades at $77.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TSCO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TSCO trades at $51.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ULTA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ULTA trades at $471.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WSM Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WSM trades at $158.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CASY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CASY trades at $506.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CHWY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CHWY trades at $41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 45.82. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GPC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GPC trades at $120.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBY trades at $71.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DKS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DKS trades at $178.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CART Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CART trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GME Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GME trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 43.97. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MUSA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MUSA trades at $388.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FIVE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FIVE trades at $126.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs W Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while W trades at $48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas W's P/E ratio is -17.04. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ETSY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ETSY trades at $53.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBWI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBWI trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GLBE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GLBE trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -84.89. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RH trades at $189.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ASO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ASO trades at $46.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AAP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AAP trades at $48.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OZON Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EYE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EYE trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -69.84. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SVV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SVV trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 73.93. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WINA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WINA trades at $441.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 39.45. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RVLV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RVLV trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EVGO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EVGO trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MNSO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MNSO trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EVGOW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EVGOW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TANNI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RERE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 939.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RERE trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HEPS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 932M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HEPS trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TDUP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 912.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TDUP trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OLPX Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 905.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OLPX trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SBH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 874.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SBH trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs YSG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 832.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while YSG trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OSTK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LQDT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 736.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LQDT trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WOOF Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 711.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WOOF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 698.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBW trades at $52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HZO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 546.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HZO trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ODP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 523.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ODP trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HNST Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 500.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HNST trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -227.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ARKO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 496.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ARKO trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 145.33. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ZKH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 491.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ZKH trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BNED Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BNED trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BYON Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 372.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BYON trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CHPT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 332.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CHPT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FLWS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 325.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FLWS trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BWMX Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 296.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BWMX trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -39.75. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 281.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LE trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 71.08. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FTCH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LOGC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LOGC trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs NEGG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NEGG trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JMIA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 197.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JMIA trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BZUN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BZUN trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BARK-WT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BARK-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs VLTA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SPWH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SPWH trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BARK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BARK trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AKA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AKA trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GOED Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DADA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DADA trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OCG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OCG trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -36.59. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DIBS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DIBS trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs APRN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GRWG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GRWG trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGP trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs NHTC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NHTC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 116.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CTIB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs PRTS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while PRTS trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HOUR Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HOUR trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBBY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CGTL Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CGTL trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SSU Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGB trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs KIRK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while KIRK trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BGFV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BGFV trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TLF Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TLF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGA trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs IPW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while IPW trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.28. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JBDI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JBDI trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs NVVE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NVVE has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NVVE trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NVVE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVVE's ROE of -33.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to NVVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BOXD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FTEL Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FTEL has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FTEL trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FTEL's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FTEL's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FTEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.