Conn's, Inc.
Conn's, Inc. (CONN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CONN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONN | $0.10 | -46.40% | 2.4M | -0.03 | -$3.17 | N/A |
| AMZN | $214.75 | -8.27% | 2.3T | 32.74 | $6.56 | N/A |
| BABA | $117.07 | -2.95% | 279.2B | 12.91 | $9.07 | +1.70% |
| PDD | $110.06 | -2.99% | 152.8B | 11.78 | $9.34 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,375.92 | +0.09% | 120.5B | 58.35 | $40.72 | N/A |
| SE | $154.21 | -1.56% | 91.3B | 107.84 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $99.12 | +0.81% | 84.7B | 35.53 | $2.79 | N/A |
| CVNA | $367.78 | -5.74% | 79.8B | 91.55 | $4.02 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,858.86 | +2.40% | 64.5B | 26.11 | $147.58 | N/A |
| CPNG | $28.74 | -2.33% | 52.2B | 205.29 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CONN vs AMZN Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AMZN trades at $214.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check AMZN's competition here
CONN vs BABA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 279.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BABA trades at $117.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BABA's competition here
CONN vs PDD Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while PDD trades at $110.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check PDD's competition here
CONN vs MELI Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MELI trades at $2,375.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check MELI's competition here
CONN vs SE Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SE trades at $154.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 107.84. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check SE's competition here
CONN vs ORLY Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ORLY trades at $99.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check ORLY's competition here
CONN vs CVNA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CVNA trades at $367.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 91.55. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check CVNA's competition here
CONN vs AZO Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AZO trades at $3,858.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check AZO's competition here
CONN vs CPNG Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CPNG trades at $28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 205.29. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check CPNG's competition here
CONN vs JD Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JD trades at $30.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check JD's competition here
CONN vs EBAY Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EBAY trades at $91.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check EBAY's competition here
CONN vs TSCO Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TSCO trades at $57.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check TSCO's competition here
CONN vs WSM Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WSM trades at $187.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check WSM's competition here
CONN vs ULTA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ULTA trades at $507.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check ULTA's competition here
CONN vs CASY Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CASY trades at $522.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check CASY's competition here
CONN vs GPC Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GPC trades at $128.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check GPC's competition here
CONN vs DKS Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DKS trades at $206.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check DKS's competition here
CONN vs CHWY Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CHWY trades at $35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check CHWY's competition here
CONN vs BBY Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBY trades at $64.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BBY's competition here
CONN vs CART Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CART trades at $47.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check CART's competition here
CONN vs GME Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GME trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check GME's competition here
CONN vs W Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while W trades at $65.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas W's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check W's competition here
CONN vs VIPS Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while VIPS trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check VIPS's competition here
CONN vs FIVE Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FIVE trades at $133.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check FIVE's competition here
CONN vs MUSA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MUSA trades at $362.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check MUSA's competition here
CONN vs BBWI Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBWI trades at $28.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BBWI's competition here
CONN vs ETSY Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ETSY trades at $58.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check ETSY's competition here
CONN vs GLBE Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GLBE trades at $31.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -84.92. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check GLBE's competition here
CONN vs RH Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RH trades at $200.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check RH's competition here
CONN vs ASO Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ASO trades at $49.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check ASO's competition here
CONN vs AAP Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AAP trades at $52.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check AAP's competition here
CONN vs OZON Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check OZON's competition here
CONN vs EYE Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EYE trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -75.66. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check EYE's competition here
CONN vs SVV Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SVV trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 81.99. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check SVV's competition here
CONN vs RVLV Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RVLV trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check RVLV's competition here
CONN vs MNSO Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MNSO trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check MNSO's competition here
CONN vs WINA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WINA trades at $370.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check WINA's competition here
CONN vs TA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check TA's competition here
CONN vs NEGG Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NEGG trades at $53.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -23.79. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check NEGG's competition here
CONN vs RERE Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RERE trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check RERE's competition here
CONN vs EVGOW Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EVGOW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check EVGOW's competition here
CONN vs EVGO Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EVGO trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check EVGO's competition here
CONN vs TDUP Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TDUP trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -29.17. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check TDUP's competition here
CONN vs TANNI Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check TANNI's competition here
CONN vs SBH Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 973.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SBH trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check SBH's competition here
CONN vs OLPX Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OLPX trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check OLPX's competition here
CONN vs HEPS Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 842M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HEPS trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.15. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check HEPS's competition here
CONN vs WOOF Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 814.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WOOF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check WOOF's competition here
CONN vs YSG Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 800M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while YSG trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check YSG's competition here
CONN vs OSTK Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check OSTK's competition here
CONN vs LQDT Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 733.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LQDT trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check LQDT's competition here
CONN vs BBW Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 651.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBW trades at $49.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BBW's competition here
CONN vs ODP Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 516.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ODP trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check ODP's competition here
CONN vs DADA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check DADA's competition here
CONN vs HNST Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 493.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HNST trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -224.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check HNST's competition here
CONN vs BWMX Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 486.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BWMX trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -76.71. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BWMX's competition here
CONN vs HZO Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 478.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HZO trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check HZO's competition here
CONN vs ZKH Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 475.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ZKH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check ZKH's competition here
CONN vs BYON Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 468.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BYON trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BYON's competition here
CONN vs ARKO Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 454.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ARKO trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 133.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check ARKO's competition here
CONN vs LE Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 351.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LE trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 88.69. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check LE's competition here
CONN vs FLWS Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FLWS trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check FLWS's competition here
CONN vs BNED Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BNED trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BNED's competition here
CONN vs JMIA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JMIA trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check JMIA's competition here
CONN vs FTCH Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check FTCH's competition here
CONN vs CHPT Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 221.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CHPT trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check CHPT's competition here
CONN vs QRTEA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check QRTEA's competition here
CONN vs LOGC Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 193.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LOGC trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check LOGC's competition here
CONN vs BARK-WT Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 188.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BARK-WT's competition here
CONN vs BZUN Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 168.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BZUN trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BZUN's competition here
CONN vs VLTA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check VLTA's competition here
CONN vs BARK Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BARK trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BARK's competition here
CONN vs QRTEP Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check QRTEP's competition here
CONN vs GOED Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check GOED's competition here
CONN vs SPWH Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SPWH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check SPWH's competition here
CONN vs AKA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AKA trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check AKA's competition here
CONN vs OCG Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OCG trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -27.83. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check OCG's competition here
CONN vs APRN Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check APRN's competition here
CONN vs DIBS Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DIBS trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check DIBS's competition here
CONN vs HOUR Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HOUR trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 172.20. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check HOUR's competition here
CONN vs GRWG Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GRWG trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check GRWG's competition here
CONN vs NHTC Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NHTC trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 155.67. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check NHTC's competition here
CONN vs QRTEB Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check QRTEB's competition here
CONN vs PRTS Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while PRTS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check PRTS's competition here
CONN vs CTIB Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check CTIB's competition here
CONN vs QVCGP Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGP trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check QVCGP's competition here
CONN vs BBBY Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BBBY's competition here
CONN vs KIRK Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check KIRK's competition here
CONN vs QVCGB Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check QVCGB's competition here
CONN vs SSU Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check SSU's competition here
CONN vs LGCB Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LGCB trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check LGCB's competition here
CONN vs BGFV Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BGFV trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check BGFV's competition here
CONN vs DTC Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DTC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check DTC's competition here
CONN vs TLF Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TLF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check TLF's competition here
CONN vs QVCGA Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGA trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check QVCGA's competition here
CONN vs CGTL Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CGTL trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check CGTL's competition here
CONN vs IPW Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while IPW trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check IPW's competition here
CONN vs JBDI Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JBDI trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check JBDI's competition here
CONN vs ZOOZ Comparison August 2025
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ZOOZ trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.Check ZOOZ's competition here