Conn's, Inc.
Conn's, Inc. CONN Peers
See (CONN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONN | $0.10 | -46.40% | 2.4M | -0.03 | -$3.17 | N/A |
| AMZN | $225.54 | +1.35% | 2.4T | 36.20 | $6.14 | N/A |
| BABA | $106.73 | +2.79% | 254.4B | 11.76 | $9.07 | +3.42% |
| PDD | $105.62 | +0.59% | 145.8B | 11.23 | $9.35 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,389.01 | -3.56% | 121.7B | 59.11 | $40.62 | N/A |
| SE | $148.59 | -2.72% | 88.5B | 104.50 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $91.57 | -1.09% | 79B | 33.96 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CVNA | $345.92 | -1.47% | 74.1B | 124.87 | $2.77 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,715.50 | -0.71% | 62.4B | 25.29 | $147.44 | N/A |
| CPNG | $30.21 | +0.12% | 55.3B | 217.50 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CONN vs AMZN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AMZN trades at $225.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BABA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BABA trades at $106.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs PDD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 145.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while PDD trades at $105.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MELI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MELI trades at $2,389.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 59.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SE trades at $148.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 104.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ORLY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ORLY trades at $91.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CVNA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CVNA trades at $345.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 124.87. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AZO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AZO trades at $3,715.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CPNG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CPNG trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 217.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JD trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs VIPS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while VIPS trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EBAY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EBAY trades at $76.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TSCO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TSCO trades at $57.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WSM Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WSM trades at $175.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ULTA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ULTA trades at $476.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CASY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CASY trades at $515.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GPC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GPC trades at $123.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DKS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DKS trades at $210.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CHWY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CHWY trades at $38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBY trades at $71.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CART Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CART trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GME Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GME trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 43.58. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MUSA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MUSA trades at $426.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs W Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while W trades at $57.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas W's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FIVE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FIVE trades at $129.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBWI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBWI trades at $32.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ETSY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ETSY trades at $57.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GLBE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GLBE trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -90.46. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RH trades at $207.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 50.62. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AAP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AAP trades at $61.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ASO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ASO trades at $50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OZON Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EYE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EYE trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -76.72. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SVV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SVV trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 74.79. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RVLV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RVLV trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs MNSO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while MNSO trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WINA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WINA trades at $373.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EVGOW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EVGOW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs EVGO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while EVGO trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SBH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SBH trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TANNI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OLPX Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OLPX trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 74.75. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HEPS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 893.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HEPS trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.86. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs YSG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 861.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while YSG trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.53. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs WOOF Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 853.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while WOOF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs RERE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 814.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while RERE trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TDUP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 808.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TDUP trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -23.59. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OSTK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LQDT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 762.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LQDT trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 679.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBW trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HZO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 598.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HZO trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ODP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 558.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ODP trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs NEGG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NEGG trades at $44.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HNST Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 530.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HNST trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -240.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ARKO Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 528.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ARKO trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 154.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DADA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs ZKH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while ZKH trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BYON Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 465.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BYON trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BNED Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 392.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BNED trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FLWS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 364.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FLWS trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BWMX Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 345.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BWMX trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -46.35. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LE Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 344.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LE trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CHPT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 317.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CHPT trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JMIA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 272.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JMIA trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FTCH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LOGC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 198.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LOGC trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BARK-WT Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BARK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BARK trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BZUN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 153.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BZUN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs VLTA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SPWH Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SPWH trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GOED Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs OCG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while OCG trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -33.11. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs AKA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 118.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while AKA trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs APRN Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs DIBS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while DIBS trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs GRWG Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while GRWG trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs HOUR Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while HOUR trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs NHTC Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while NHTC trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 112.50. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QRTEB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGP Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGP trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CTIB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs PRTS Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while PRTS trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BBBY Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs SSU Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BGFV Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BGFV trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs TLF Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while TLF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs KIRK Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while KIRK trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs CGTL Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while CGTL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs QVCGA Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while QVCGA trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs IPW Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while IPW trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs JBDI Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while JBDI trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs LGCB Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while LGCB trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -12.15. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs FTEL Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FTEL has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while FTEL trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FTEL's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FTEL's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to FTEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.
CONN vs BOXD Comparison
CONN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CONN is priced at $0.10, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CONN's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CONN is more volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONN.