Chewy, Inc.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while AMZN trades at $212.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 270.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BABA trades at $112.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while PDD trades at $100.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while MELI trades at $2,371.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 58.34. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while SE trades at $154.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 108.77. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while ORLY trades at $89.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while CVNA trades at $296.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 103.82. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while AZO trades at $3,638.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while CPNG trades at $28.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 200.79. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while JD trades at $32.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while VIPS trades at $14.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while EBAY trades at $77.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while TSCO trades at $51.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while ULTA trades at $459.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while WSM trades at $153.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while CASY trades at $506.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while GPC trades at $119.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BBY trades at $69.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while DKS trades at $176.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while CART trades at $43.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while GME trades at $22.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while MUSA trades at $401.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while FIVE trades at $121.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while W trades at $46.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas W's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while ETSY trades at $55.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while GLBE trades at $31.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -86.35. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BBWI trades at $25.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while RH trades at $189.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 44.71. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while AAP trades at $48.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while ASO trades at $43.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while EYE trades at $21.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -67.25. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while SVV trades at $10.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 73.39. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while WINA trades at $430.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while RVLV trades at $20.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while MNSO trades at $17.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while EVGO trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while EVGOW trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 917.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while HEPS trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.39. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 891M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while RERE trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 863.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while TDUP trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.17. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 855.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while SBH trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 847.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while YSG trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 839.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while OLPX trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 730.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while LQDT trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 689.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while WOOF trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 658.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BBW trades at $49.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 520.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while ODP trades at $17.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 514.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while HZO trades at $23.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 500.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while HNST trades at $4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -227.00. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 479.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while ARKO trades at $4.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 140.17. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BYON trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BNED trades at $10.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 329.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while CHPT trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 315.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while FLWS trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 292.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BWMX trades at $7.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -39.22. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while LE trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 68.15. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while LOGC trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while JMIA trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 181.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while NEGG trades at $9.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 164.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BZUN trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while SPWH trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BARK-WT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BARK trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 128.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while DADA trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while AKA trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while OCG trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -34.87. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while DIBS trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while GRWG trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while QVCGP trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while NHTC trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 117.75. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while PRTS trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while HOUR trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 123.40. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BBBY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while QVCGB trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BGFV trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while CGTL trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while KIRK trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while TLF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while QVCGA trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while IPW trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while JBDI trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while ZKH trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while LITB trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to LITB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while ZOOZ trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.

CHWY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHWY stands at 17.3B. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHWY is priced at $41.65, while MI trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHWY currently has a P/E ratio of 45.77, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, CHWY's ROE is +0.97%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHWY is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHWY.