Instacart (Maplebear Inc.)
Instacart (Maplebear Inc.) CART Peers
See (CART) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CART | $43.36 | -1.63% | 11.3B | 28.53 | $1.52 | N/A |
AMZN | $212.11 | -0.53% | 2.3T | 34.55 | $6.14 | N/A |
BABA | $112.85 | -3.23% | 270.2B | 12.44 | $9.07 | +1.76% |
PDD | $100.59 | -2.75% | 142.8B | 10.82 | $9.30 | N/A |
MELI | $2,371.50 | +0.11% | 120.2B | 58.34 | $40.65 | N/A |
SE | $154.46 | -0.11% | 91.4B | 108.77 | $1.42 | N/A |
ORLY | $89.92 | -1.24% | 76.9B | 33.68 | $2.67 | N/A |
CVNA | $296.92 | -6.91% | 63.6B | 103.82 | $2.86 | N/A |
AZO | $3,638.60 | -1.22% | 60.9B | 24.66 | $147.53 | N/A |
CPNG | $28.11 | -0.71% | 51B | 200.79 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CART vs AMZN Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while AMZN trades at $212.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BABA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 270.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BABA trades at $112.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs PDD Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while PDD trades at $100.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs MELI Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while MELI trades at $2,371.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 58.34. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs SE Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while SE trades at $154.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 108.77. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs ORLY Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while ORLY trades at $89.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs CVNA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while CVNA trades at $296.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 103.82. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs AZO Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while AZO trades at $3,638.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs CPNG Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while CPNG trades at $28.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 200.79. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs JD Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while JD trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs VIPS Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while VIPS trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs EBAY Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while EBAY trades at $77.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs TSCO Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while TSCO trades at $51.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs ULTA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while ULTA trades at $459.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs WSM Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while WSM trades at $153.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs CASY Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while CASY trades at $506.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs CHWY Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while CHWY trades at $41.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 45.77. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs GPC Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while GPC trades at $119.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BBY Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BBY trades at $69.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs DKS Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while DKS trades at $176.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs GME Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while GME trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs MUSA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while MUSA trades at $401.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs FIVE Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while FIVE trades at $121.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs W Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while W trades at $46.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas W's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs ETSY Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while ETSY trades at $55.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs GLBE Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while GLBE trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -86.35. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BBWI Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BBWI trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs RH Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while RH trades at $189.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 44.71. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs AAP Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while AAP trades at $48.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs ASO Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while ASO trades at $43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs OZON Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs EYE Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while EYE trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -67.25. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs SVV Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while SVV trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 73.39. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs WINA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while WINA trades at $430.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs RVLV Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while RVLV trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs MNSO Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while MNSO trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs EVGO Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while EVGO trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs TA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs EVGOW Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while EVGOW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs TANNI Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs HEPS Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 917.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while HEPS trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.39. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs RERE Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 891M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while RERE trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs TDUP Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 863.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while TDUP trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.17. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs SBH Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 855.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while SBH trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs YSG Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 847.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while YSG trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs OLPX Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 839.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while OLPX trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs OSTK Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs LQDT Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 730.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while LQDT trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs WOOF Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 689.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while WOOF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BBW Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 658.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BBW trades at $49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs ODP Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 520.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while ODP trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs HZO Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 514.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while HZO trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs HNST Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 500.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while HNST trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -227.00. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs ARKO Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 479.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while ARKO trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 140.17. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BYON Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BYON trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BNED Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BNED trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs CHPT Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 329.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while CHPT trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs FLWS Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 315.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while FLWS trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BWMX Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 292.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BWMX trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -39.22. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs LE Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while LE trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 68.15. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs FTCH Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs LOGC Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while LOGC trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs QRTEA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs JMIA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while JMIA trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs NEGG Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 181.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while NEGG trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BZUN Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 164.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BZUN trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs SPWH Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while SPWH trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs VLTA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BARK-WT Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BARK-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BARK Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BARK trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs QRTEP Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs GOED Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs DADA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 128.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while DADA trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs AKA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while AKA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs OCG Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while OCG trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -34.87. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs APRN Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs DIBS Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while DIBS trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs GRWG Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while GRWG trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs QVCGP Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while QVCGP trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs NHTC Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while NHTC trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 117.75. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs QRTEB Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs CTIB Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs PRTS Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while PRTS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs HOUR Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while HOUR trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 123.40. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BBBY Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs SSU Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs QVCGB Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while QVCGB trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BGFV Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BGFV trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs CGTL Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while CGTL trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs KIRK Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while KIRK trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs TLF Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while TLF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs QVCGA Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while QVCGA trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs IPW Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while IPW trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs JBDI Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while JBDI trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs BOXD Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs ZKH Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while ZKH trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs LITB Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while LITB trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LITB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs ZOOZ Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while ZOOZ trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.
CART vs MI Comparison
CART plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CART stands at 11.3B. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CART is priced at $43.36, while MI trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CART currently has a P/E ratio of 28.53, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, CART's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CART is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CART.