Nuburu, Inc.
Nuburu, Inc. BURU Peers
See (BURU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BURU | $0.36 | +4.53% | 20.9M | 4.80 | $0.07 | N/A |
| ETN | $356.75 | +2.47% | 138.2B | 35.61 | $9.92 | +1.12% |
| PH | $697.94 | +0.90% | 89.6B | 26.99 | $25.97 | +0.96% |
| EMR | $133.22 | +0.37% | 74.9B | 38.49 | $3.46 | +1.59% |
| HWM | $186.27 | +5.33% | 74.6B | 60.42 | $3.06 | +0.20% |
| ITW | $245.62 | -0.46% | 72.7B | 21.83 | $11.36 | +2.39% |
| ROP | $562.54 | -0.49% | 60.6B | 40.57 | $13.89 | +0.56% |
| CMI | $327.13 | +0.90% | 44.9B | 16.05 | $20.30 | +2.24% |
| AME | $179.94 | +0.06% | 41.7B | 29.48 | $6.12 | +0.66% |
| OTIS | $98.50 | +1.00% | 38.5B | 25.55 | $3.82 | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
BURU vs ETN Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while ETN trades at $356.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs PH Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while PH trades at $697.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs EMR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while EMR trades at $133.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 38.49. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs HWM Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while HWM trades at $186.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 60.42. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs ITW Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while ITW trades at $245.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs ROP Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while ROP trades at $562.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CMI Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CMI trades at $327.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs AME Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while AME trades at $179.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs OTIS Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while OTIS trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs ROK Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while ROK trades at $331.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs B Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while B trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas B's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs IR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while IR trades at $83.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs XYL Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while XYL trades at $128.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs HWM-P Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while HWM-P trades at $70.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 98.53. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs DOV Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while DOV trades at $182.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs PNR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while PNR trades at $102.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs GGG Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while GGG trades at $85.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs IEX Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while IEX trades at $175.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs ITT Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while ITT trades at $156.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs NDSN Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while NDSN trades at $214.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CR trades at $187.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 38.28. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs RRX Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while RRX trades at $145.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs AOS Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while AOS trades at $65.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs GNRC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while GNRC trades at $143.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs WTS Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while WTS trades at $245.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs DCI Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while DCI trades at $69.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs SPXC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while SPXC trades at $166.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs MIDD Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while MIDD trades at $142.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs GTLS Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while GTLS trades at $164.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs PSN Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while PSN trades at $71.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs FLS Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while FLS trades at $52.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs JBTM Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while JBTM trades at $120.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -85.68. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs GTES Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while GTES trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CSWI Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs MIR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while MIR trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -434.30. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs FELE Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while FELE trades at $89.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs AIMC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs NPO Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while NPO trades at $189.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs JBT Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs MWA Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while MWA trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs KAI Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while KAI trades at $313.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs ATS Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while ATS trades at $31.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -150.67. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CXT Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CXT trades at $53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs GTLS-PB Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while GTLS-PB trades at $61.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs EPAC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while EPAC trades at $40.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CFX Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs SXI Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while SXI trades at $155.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs ENOV Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while ENOV trades at $31.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs XMTR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while XMTR trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -33.97. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs AMSC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while AMSC trades at $36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 227.75. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs PSIX Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while PSIX trades at $67.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs TNC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while TNC trades at $77.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs HI Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while HI trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs NNE Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while NNE trades at $34.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -35.27. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CIR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs HLIO Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while HLIO trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs BW-PA Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 993.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while BW-PA trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs GRC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 977.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while GRC trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs THR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 938.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while THR trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs KRNT Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 900.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while KRNT trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -110.33. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CYD Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 857.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CYD trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs SERV Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 653.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while SERV trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs GHM Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 555.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while GHM trades at $49.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 45.74. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs BLDP Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while BLDP trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs OFLX Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while OFLX trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs BGRY Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs LXFR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 332.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while LXFR trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs PKOH Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 254.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while PKOH trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs RR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while RR trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs NPWR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while NPWR trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NPWR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs TAYD Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while TAYD trades at $43.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs TWIN Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while TWIN trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs HURC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while HURC trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs SHMD Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while SHMD trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs HUHU Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while HUHU trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -47.80. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs WFF Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 100.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while WFF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 199.50. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs BW Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while BW trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs XCH Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while XCH trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs SIMA Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while SIMA trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs PYR Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs TPIC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while TPIC trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs BWEN Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while BWEN trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -46.25. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs GTEC Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while GTEC trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs LASE Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while LASE trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs LBGJ Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while LBGJ trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -26.17. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs HCAI Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while HCAI trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs INLF Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while INLF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CVV Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CVV trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -286.00. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CETY Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CETY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs SHMDW Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while SHMDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CGRN Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs JCSE Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while JCSE trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs SHPW Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs NMHI Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 469K. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while NMHI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs NMHIW Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is less volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs BGRYW Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs WBT Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs RAVN Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.
BURU vs CFXA Comparison
BURU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURU stands at 20.9M. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BURU is priced at $0.36, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURU currently has a P/E ratio of 4.80, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, BURU's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BURU is more volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURU.