Benson Hill, Inc.
Benson Hill, Inc. BHIL-WT Peers
See (BHIL-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHIL-WT | $0.00 | -86.04% | 49M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $69.73 | +0.00% | 60.9B | N/A | N/A | +6.36% |
| CTVA | $74.53 | +0.00% | 51.2B | 45.22 | $1.66 | +0.90% |
| NTR | $58.24 | +0.00% | 28.5B | 55.22 | $1.06 | +3.70% |
| CF | $92.00 | +0.00% | 15B | 12.23 | $7.56 | +2.16% |
| MOS | $36.48 | +0.00% | 11.7B | 31.70 | $1.16 | +2.33% |
| ICL | $6.88 | +0.00% | 9B | 22.60 | $0.31 | +2.64% |
| FMC | $41.75 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 14.00 | $3.07 | +5.37% |
| SMG | $65.96 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 115.70 | $0.58 | +3.92% |
| UAN | $88.84 | +0.00% | 934.6M | 12.40 | $7.13 | +7.93% |
Stock Comparison
BHIL-WT vs CTA-PB Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while CTA-PB trades at $69.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs CTVA Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while CTVA trades at $74.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs NTR Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while NTR trades at $58.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 55.22. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs CF Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while CF trades at $92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs MOS Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while MOS trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs ICL Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while ICL trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs FMC Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while FMC trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs SMG Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while SMG trades at $65.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 115.70. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs UAN Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 934.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while UAN trades at $88.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs IPI Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 480.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while IPI trades at $35.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs BIOX Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 287.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while BIOX trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -32.79. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs LVRO Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while LVRO trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs AVD Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while AVD trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs MULG Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs CGA Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs ENFY Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while ENFY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs SEED Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while SEED trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs NITO Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while NITO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs RKDA Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while RKDA trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs SVFD Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs FMTO Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while FMTO trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs BHIL Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs YTEN Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs CTA-PA Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while CTA-PA trades at $55.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.
BHIL-WT vs MBII Comparison
BHIL-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHIL-WT stands at 49M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHIL-WT is priced at $0.00, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHIL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, BHIL-WT's ROE is -1.78%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BHIL-WT is more volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHIL-WT.