BARK, Inc.
BARK, Inc. BARK-WT Peers
See (BARK-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BARK-WT | $0.02 | -34.52% | 79.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMZN | $220.33 | +3.93% | 2.3T | 35.30 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $114.96 | +0.36% | 271.8B | 12.56 | $9.07 | +1.74% |
| PDD | $105.43 | -1.60% | 146.9B | 11.35 | $9.32 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,551.15 | +0.42% | 129.8B | 62.87 | $40.72 | N/A |
| SE | $158.12 | +1.48% | 93.8B | 110.84 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $88.76 | +1.05% | 75.4B | 32.68 | $2.70 | N/A |
| CVNA | $310.15 | -1.78% | 65.6B | 106.42 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,541.12 | +1.48% | 58.9B | 23.85 | $147.64 | N/A |
| CPNG | $30.35 | +5.25% | 54.1B | 213.00 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BARK-WT vs AMZN Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while AMZN trades at $220.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BABA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 271.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BABA trades at $114.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs PDD Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while PDD trades at $105.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs MELI Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while MELI trades at $2,551.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs SE Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while SE trades at $158.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 110.84. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs ORLY Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while ORLY trades at $88.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs CVNA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while CVNA trades at $310.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 106.42. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs AZO Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while AZO trades at $3,541.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs CPNG Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while CPNG trades at $30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 213.00. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs JD Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while JD trades at $33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs VIPS Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while VIPS trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs EBAY Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while EBAY trades at $74.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs TSCO Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while TSCO trades at $51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs ULTA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while ULTA trades at $458.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs WSM Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while WSM trades at $162.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs CASY Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while CASY trades at $501.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs CHWY Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while CHWY trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 47.76. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs GPC Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while GPC trades at $120.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs DKS Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while DKS trades at $205.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BBY Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BBY trades at $68.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs CART Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while CART trades at $44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs GME Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while GME trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs MUSA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while MUSA trades at $401.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs FIVE Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while FIVE trades at $132.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs W Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while W trades at $51.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas W's P/E ratio is -17.84. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BBWI Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BBWI trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs GLBE Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while GLBE trades at $32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -87.73. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs ETSY Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while ETSY trades at $50.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs RH Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while RH trades at $196.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 45.84. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs ASO Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while ASO trades at $46.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs AAP Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while AAP trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs OZON Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs EYE Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while EYE trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -72.06. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs SVV Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while SVV trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 74.14. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs RVLV Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while RVLV trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs MNSO Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while MNSO trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs WINA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while WINA trades at $382.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs TA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs EVGO Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while EVGO trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs EVGOW Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while EVGOW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs RERE Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while RERE trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs OLPX Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while OLPX trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 77.25. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs TANNI Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs YSG Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 950.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while YSG trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs TDUP Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 925.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while TDUP trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs SBH Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 903M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while SBH trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs HEPS Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 864.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while HEPS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.21. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs WOOF Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 778.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while WOOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs OSTK Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs LQDT Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while LQDT trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BBW Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BBW trades at $52.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs HZO Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while HZO trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs ODP Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 540.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while ODP trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs HNST Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 536.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while HNST trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -243.50. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs ARKO Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 501.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while ARKO trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 146.67. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs ZKH Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 500.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while ZKH trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BYON Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BYON trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BNED Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BNED trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs CHPT Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 346.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while CHPT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BWMX Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BWMX trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -42.17. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs FLWS Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 327.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while FLWS trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs LE Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while LE trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 80.92. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs NEGG Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 263.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while NEGG trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs FTCH Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs QRTEA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs JMIA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while JMIA trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs LOGC Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while LOGC trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BARK Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BARK trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BZUN Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BZUN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs VLTA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs QRTEP Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs GOED Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs DADA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs SPWH Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while SPWH trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs AKA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while AKA trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs OCG Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while OCG trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -34.88. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs DIBS Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while DIBS trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs APRN Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs GRWG Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while GRWG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs QVCGP Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while QVCGP trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs QRTEB Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs NHTC Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while NHTC trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 108.50. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs HOUR Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while HOUR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs CTIB Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs PRTS Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while PRTS trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BBBY Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs SSU Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs QVCGB Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while QVCGB trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BGFV Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BGFV trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs TLF Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while TLF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs CGTL Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while CGTL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs KIRK Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while KIRK trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs QVCGA Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while QVCGA trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs JBDI Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while JBDI trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs IPW Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while IPW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.34. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs BOXD Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs ZOOZ Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while ZOOZ trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs NVVEW Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, NVVEW has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while NVVEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NVVEW's ROE of -33.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to NVVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.
BARK-WT vs MI Comparison
BARK-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BARK-WT stands at 79.1M. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BARK-WT is priced at $0.02, while MI trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BARK-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, BARK-WT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BARK-WT is more volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BARK-WT.