Arko Corp.
Arko Corp. ARKOW Peers
See (ARKOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARKOW | $0.01 | -3.36% | 1.3M | 0.02 | $0.55 | +2.64% |
| AMZN | $225.02 | +1.24% | 2.4T | 36.64 | $6.14 | N/A |
| BABA | $106.72 | +0.08% | 254.6B | 11.77 | $9.07 | +3.41% |
| PDD | $104.91 | -0.06% | 145.7B | 11.22 | $9.35 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,387.45 | -0.61% | 120.9B | 58.73 | $40.62 | N/A |
| SE | $148.26 | -0.76% | 87.8B | 103.66 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $91.62 | -0.82% | 78.3B | 33.67 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CVNA | $343.67 | -0.54% | 73.5B | 123.99 | $2.77 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,705.64 | -0.61% | 61.9B | 25.11 | $147.44 | N/A |
| CPNG | $30.08 | -1.22% | 54.6B | 214.82 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ARKOW vs AMZN Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while AMZN trades at $225.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BABA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 254.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BABA trades at $106.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs PDD Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 145.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while PDD trades at $104.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs MELI Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 120.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while MELI trades at $2,387.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 58.73. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs SE Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while SE trades at $148.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 103.66. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs ORLY Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while ORLY trades at $91.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs CVNA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while CVNA trades at $343.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 123.99. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs AZO Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while AZO trades at $3,705.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs CPNG Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while CPNG trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 214.82. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs JD Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while JD trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs VIPS Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while VIPS trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs EBAY Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while EBAY trades at $77.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs TSCO Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while TSCO trades at $56.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs WSM Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while WSM trades at $174.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs ULTA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while ULTA trades at $476.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs CASY Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while CASY trades at $516.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs GPC Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while GPC trades at $124.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs DKS Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while DKS trades at $209.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs CHWY Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while CHWY trades at $37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BBY Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BBY trades at $71.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs CART Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while CART trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs GME Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while GME trades at $23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 44.08. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs MUSA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while MUSA trades at $424.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs W Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while W trades at $57.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas W's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs FIVE Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while FIVE trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BBWI Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BBWI trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs ETSY Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while ETSY trades at $57.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs GLBE Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while GLBE trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -89.22. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs RH Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while RH trades at $207.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 49.20. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs AAP Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while AAP trades at $62.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs ASO Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while ASO trades at $50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs OZON Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs EYE Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while EYE trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -76.42. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs SVV Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while SVV trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 73.39. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs RVLV Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while RVLV trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs MNSO Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while MNSO trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs WINA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while WINA trades at $369.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs TA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs EVGO Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while EVGO trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs EVGOW Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while EVGOW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs TANNI Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs SBH Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 991.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while SBH trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs OLPX Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 962.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while OLPX trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 72.25. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs NEGG Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 956.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while NEGG trades at $49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -21.92. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs HEPS Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while HEPS trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs YSG Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 886.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while YSG trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs TDUP Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 837.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while TDUP trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -24.41. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs WOOF Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while WOOF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs RERE Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 789.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while RERE trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs OSTK Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs LQDT Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 747.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while LQDT trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BBW Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 657.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BBW trades at $49.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs HZO Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 579.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while HZO trades at $26.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs ODP Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 546M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while ODP trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs ARKO Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 516.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while ARKO trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 151.17. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs HNST Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 510.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while HNST trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -231.75. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs DADA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs ZKH Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 497.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while ZKH trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BYON Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 449M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BYON trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BNED Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BNED trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs FLWS Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 356.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while FLWS trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BWMX Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BWMX trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -47.10. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs LE Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 325M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while LE trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 82.04. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs CHPT Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while CHPT trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs JMIA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while JMIA trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs FTCH Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs QRTEA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs LOGC Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 193.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while LOGC trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BARK-WT Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 176.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BARK Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BARK trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BZUN Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 153.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BZUN trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs VLTA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs SPWH Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while SPWH trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs QRTEP Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs OCG Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while OCG trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -34.77. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs GOED Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs AKA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while AKA trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs APRN Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs DIBS Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while DIBS trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs GRWG Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while GRWG trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs HOUR Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while HOUR trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 163.50. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs NHTC Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while NHTC trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 113.50. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs QRTEB Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs QVCGP Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while QVCGP trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs CTIB Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs PRTS Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while PRTS trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BBBY Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs SSU Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BGFV Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BGFV trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs QVCGB Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs TLF Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while TLF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs KIRK Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while KIRK trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs CGTL Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while CGTL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs QVCGA Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while QVCGA trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs IPW Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while IPW trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.93. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs JBDI Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while JBDI trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs LGCB Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while LGCB trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs FTEL Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FTEL has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while FTEL trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas FTEL's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTEL's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to FTEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.
ARKOW vs BOXD Comparison
ARKOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARKOW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, ARKOW is priced at $0.01, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARKOW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.02, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ARKOW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ARKOW is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARKOW.