Aqua Metals, Inc.
Aqua Metals, Inc. AQMS Peers
See (AQMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQMS | $0.63 | -16.21% | 6M | -0.17 | -$3.81 | N/A |
| WM | $232.00 | -0.52% | 93.4B | 34.94 | $6.64 | +1.36% |
| RSG | $248.16 | -0.05% | 77.5B | 37.49 | $6.62 | +0.92% |
| WCN | $185.70 | -0.77% | 48B | 76.74 | $2.42 | +0.66% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| GFL | $49.40 | -0.78% | 17.5B | -32.08 | -$1.54 | +0.12% |
| CLH | $226.18 | -0.07% | 12.1B | 31.37 | $7.21 | N/A |
| CWST | $115.99 | -1.28% | 7.2B | 527.23 | $0.22 | N/A |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.1B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AQMS vs WM Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while WM trades at $232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs RSG Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while RSG trades at $248.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs WCN Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while WCN trades at $185.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 76.74. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs GFLU Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs GFL Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while GFL trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is -32.08. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs CLH Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while CLH trades at $226.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs CWST Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while CWST trades at $115.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 527.23. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs SRCL Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to SRCL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs HCCI Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs MEG Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 745.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while MEG trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs HSC Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs NVRI Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 671.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while NVRI trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs AMBI Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while AMBI trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to AMBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs PESI Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while PESI trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs LNZA Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while LNZA trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs QRHC Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while QRHC trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs LICY Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs JAN Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while JAN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs ENGS Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while ENGS trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs CHRA Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs DXST Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while DXST trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to DXST's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs GWAV Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while GWAV trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs CDTG Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while CDTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CDTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs AWX Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while AWX trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs CHNR Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while CHNR trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs SMED Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs ECOL Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs ECOLW Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs CVA Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.
AQMS vs NES Comparison
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 6M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $0.63, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.51%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.