Amazon.com, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc. AMZN Peers
See (AMZN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $220.33 | +3.93% | 2.3T | 35.30 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $114.96 | +0.36% | 271.8B | 12.56 | $9.07 | +1.74% |
| PDD | $105.43 | -1.60% | 146.9B | 11.35 | $9.32 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,551.15 | +0.42% | 129.8B | 62.87 | $40.72 | N/A |
| SE | $158.12 | +1.48% | 93.8B | 110.84 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $88.76 | +1.05% | 75.4B | 32.68 | $2.70 | N/A |
| CVNA | $310.15 | -1.78% | 65.6B | 106.42 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,541.12 | +1.48% | 58.9B | 23.85 | $147.64 | N/A |
| CPNG | $30.35 | +5.25% | 54.1B | 213.00 | $0.14 | N/A |
| JD | $33.12 | +0.55% | 47.9B | 8.09 | $4.11 | +2.95% |
Stock Comparison
AMZN vs BABA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 271.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BABA trades at $114.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs PDD Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while PDD trades at $105.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs MELI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while MELI trades at $2,551.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while SE trades at $158.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 110.84. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ORLY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while ORLY trades at $88.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CVNA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while CVNA trades at $310.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 106.42. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs AZO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while AZO trades at $3,541.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CPNG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while CPNG trades at $30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 213.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs JD Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while JD trades at $33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs VIPS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while VIPS trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs EBAY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while EBAY trades at $74.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TSCO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while TSCO trades at $51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ULTA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while ULTA trades at $458.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs WSM Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while WSM trades at $162.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CASY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while CASY trades at $501.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CHWY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while CHWY trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 47.76. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GPC Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while GPC trades at $120.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs DKS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while DKS trades at $205.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BBY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BBY trades at $68.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CART Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while CART trades at $44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GME Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while GME trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs MUSA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while MUSA trades at $401.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs FIVE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while FIVE trades at $132.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs W Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, W has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while W trades at $51.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas W's P/E ratio is -17.84. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BBWI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BBWI trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GLBE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while GLBE trades at $32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -87.73. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ETSY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while ETSY trades at $50.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs RH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while RH trades at $196.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 45.84. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ASO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while ASO trades at $46.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs AAP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while AAP trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs OZON Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs EYE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while EYE trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -72.06. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SVV Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while SVV trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 74.14. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs RVLV Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while RVLV trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs MNSO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while MNSO trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs WINA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while WINA trades at $382.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs EVGO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while EVGO trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs EVGOW Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while EVGOW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs RERE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while RERE trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs OLPX Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while OLPX trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 77.25. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TANNI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs YSG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 950.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while YSG trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TDUP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 925.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while TDUP trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SBH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 903M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while SBH trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs HEPS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 864.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while HEPS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.21. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs WOOF Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 778.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while WOOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs OSTK Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs LQDT Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while LQDT trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BBW Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BBW trades at $52.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs HZO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while HZO trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ODP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 540.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while ODP trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs HNST Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 536.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while HNST trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -243.50. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ARKO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 501.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while ARKO trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 146.67. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ZKH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 500.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while ZKH trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BYON Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BYON trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BNED Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BNED trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CHPT Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 346.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while CHPT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BWMX Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BWMX trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -42.17. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs FLWS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 327.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while FLWS trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs LE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while LE trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 80.92. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs NEGG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 263.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while NEGG trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs FTCH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QRTEA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs JMIA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while JMIA trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs LOGC Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while LOGC trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BARK Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BARK trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BZUN Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BZUN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs VLTA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QRTEP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GOED Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs DADA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SPWH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while SPWH trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs AKA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while AKA trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs OCG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while OCG trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -34.88. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs DIBS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while DIBS trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs APRN Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BARK-WT Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GRWG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while GRWG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QVCGP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while QVCGP trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QRTEB Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs NHTC Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while NHTC trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 108.50. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs HOUR Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while HOUR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CTIB Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs PRTS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while PRTS trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BBBY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SSU Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QVCGB Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while QVCGB trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BGFV Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BGFV trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TLF Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while TLF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CGTL Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while CGTL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs KIRK Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while KIRK trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QVCGA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while QVCGA trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs JBDI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while JBDI trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs IPW Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while IPW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.34. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BOXD Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ZOOZ Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while ZOOZ trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs NVVEW Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, NVVEW has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while NVVEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas NVVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVVEW's ROE of -33.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to NVVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs MI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.3T. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $220.33, while MI trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.30, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.