Amazon.com, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc. AMZN Peers
See (AMZN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $208.64 | +8.07% | 2.22T | 34.04 | $6.13 | N/A |
| BABA | $132.57 | +5.78% | 321.27B | 15.17 | $8.74 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,504.61 | +2.23% | 126.98B | 66.29 | $37.78 | N/A |
| SE | $142.54 | +2.42% | 84.38B | 192.61 | $0.74 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,339.61 | -1.45% | 76.68B | 32.84 | $40.79 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,662.11 | -0.04% | 61.26B | 24.57 | $149.07 | N/A |
| CVNA | $279.58 | +4.27% | 59.87B | 176.95 | $1.58 | N/A |
| JD | $36.05 | +6.47% | 52.20B | 9.77 | $3.69 | +2.71% |
| CPNG | $26.13 | +0.50% | 47.44B | 186.64 | $0.14 | N/A |
| PDD | $116.38 | +6.14% | 41.30B | 11.14 | $10.45 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMZN vs BABA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 321.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BABA trades at $132.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs MELI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 126.98B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while MELI trades at $2,504.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 66.29. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 84.38B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while SE trades at $142.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 192.61. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ORLY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 76.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while ORLY trades at $1,339.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs AZO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 61.26B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while AZO trades at $3,662.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CVNA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 59.87B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while CVNA trades at $279.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 176.95. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs JD Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 52.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while JD trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CPNG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 47.44B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while CPNG trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 186.64. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN and CPNG have similar daily volatility (2.83).
AMZN vs PDD Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 41.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while PDD trades at $116.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs VIPS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while VIPS trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs EBAY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 31.87B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while EBAY trades at $69.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TSCO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while TSCO trades at $52.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs FIVE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 22.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while FIVE trades at $103.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs WSM Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.37B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while WSM trades at $173.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ULTA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 18.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while ULTA trades at $412.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs DKS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 17.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while DKS trades at $212.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GPC Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.93B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while GPC trades at $121.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CHWY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 16.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while CHWY trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 43.41. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CASY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while CASY trades at $436.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BBY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BBY trades at $73.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GME Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 12.53B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while GME trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 84.91. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CART Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while CART trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs MUSA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.69B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while MUSA trades at $439.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BBWI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 7.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BBWI trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GLBE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while GLBE trades at $41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -92.03. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QVCGP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while QVCGP trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs W Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while W trades at $39.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas W's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ETSY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while ETSY trades at $47.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs RH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while RH trades at $226.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 62.31. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ASO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while ASO trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs OZON Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs AAP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while AAP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SVV Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while SVV trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 80.86. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs MNSO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while MNSO trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs EYE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while EYE trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -56.85. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs WINA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while WINA trades at $409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs RVLV Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while RVLV trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs EVGO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while EVGO trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs EVGOW Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while EVGOW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SBH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while SBH trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TANNI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs HEPS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 903.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while HEPS trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -21.31. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs OLPX Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 889.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while OLPX trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs WOOF Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 881.93M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while WOOF trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs RERE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 864.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while RERE trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is -51.90. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs OSTK Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs LQDT Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 751.17M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while LQDT trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TDUP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 729.59M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while TDUP trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -21.28. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ARKO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 590.29M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while ARKO trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 39.85. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ODP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 573.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while ODP trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs HNST Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 558.90M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while HNST trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -84.50. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BBW Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 545.67M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BBW trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs HZO Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 516.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while HZO trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BNED Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 366.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BNED trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BWMX Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 357.49M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BWMX trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -47.90. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs FLWS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 330.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while FLWS trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -47.18. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CHPT Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 305.25M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while CHPT trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BYON Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 289.26M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BYON trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs LE Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 284.11M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while LE trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs FTCH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.21M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BARK-WT Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 226.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BARK-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BARK Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 218.64M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BARK trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs JMIA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 217.07M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while JMIA trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QRTEA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.51M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -9.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BZUN Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 209.38M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BZUN trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs WBUY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 199.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while WBUY trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -98.33. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs LOGC Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 197.88M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while LOGC trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs VLTA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 149.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QRTEP Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130.03M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs OCG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 129.99M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while OCG trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -11.29. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GOED Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs DADA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 128.93M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while DADA trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QVCGB Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 117.29M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while QVCGB trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs APRN Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 99.98M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APRN's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs DIBS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 96.37M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while DIBS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs NEGG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 95.10M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while NEGG trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs AKA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 93.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while AKA trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SPWH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 76.57M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while SPWH trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs GRWG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 66.64M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while GRWG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs NHTC Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 59.29M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while NHTC trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 128.75. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QVCGA Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 54.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while QVCGA trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs QRTEB Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CTIB Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs PRTS Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 48.03M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while PRTS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs HOUR Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 46.40M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while HOUR trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BBBY Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 41.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs SSU Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs KIRK Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while KIRK trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs JBDI Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 25.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while JBDI trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -25.60. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs TLF Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 24.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while TLF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BGFV Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 23.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BGFV trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs CGTL Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 21.12M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while CGTL trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs YSG Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 20.60M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while YSG trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs IPW Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 17.93M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while IPW trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ZOOZ Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 17.19M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while ZOOZ trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs BOXD Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs ZKH Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.58M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while ZKH trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -12.38. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.
AMZN vs LITB Comparison
AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.22T. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 11.74M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $208.64, while LITB trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.04, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LITB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.