Amazon.com, Inc.

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 287B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BABA trades at $120.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BABA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while PDD trades at $113.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check PDD's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 119.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while MELI trades at $2,317.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 57.60. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check MELI's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while ORLY trades at $104.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 36.90. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check ORLY's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while SE trades at $147.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 103.25. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check SE's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while CVNA trades at $354.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 86.06. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check CVNA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while AZO trades at $4,072.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check AZO's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while CPNG trades at $28.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 139.07. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check CPNG's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while JD trades at $31.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check JD's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while EBAY trades at $92.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check EBAY's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while TSCO trades at $60.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check TSCO's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while WSM trades at $200.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check WSM's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while ULTA trades at $516.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check ULTA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while CASY trades at $521.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check CASY's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while GPC trades at $133.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check GPC's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while DKS trades at $216.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check DKS's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while CHWY trades at $34.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check CHWY's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BBY trades at $67.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BBY's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while CART trades at $47.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check CART's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while GME trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check GME's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, W has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while W trades at $76.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas W's P/E ratio is -31.61. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check W's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while VIPS trades at $15.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check VIPS's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while FIVE trades at $135.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check FIVE's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while MUSA trades at $367.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check MUSA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while ETSY trades at $56.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check ETSY's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BBWI trades at $29.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BBWI's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while GLBE trades at $34.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -93.78. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check GLBE's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while RH trades at $213.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 50.95. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check RH's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while AAP trades at $60.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check AAP's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while ASO trades at $51.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check ASO's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check OZON's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while EYE trades at $23.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -113.20. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check EYE's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while SVV trades at $11.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 55.72. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check SVV's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while NEGG trades at $58.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -35.46. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check NEGG's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while MNSO trades at $19.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check MNSO's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while RVLV trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check RVLV's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while WINA trades at $392.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check WINA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check TA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while TDUP trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check TDUP's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while RERE trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check RERE's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while SBH trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check SBH's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while EVGOW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check EVGOW's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while EVGO trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check EVGO's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check TANNI's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 915.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while HEPS trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check HEPS's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 884.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while WOOF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check WOOF's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while OLPX trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check OLPX's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 851.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while YSG trades at $9.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check YSG's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check OSTK's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 748.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while LQDT trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check LQDT's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 653.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BBW trades at $51.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BBW's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 583.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while ODP trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check ODP's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 549.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while ARKO trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 60.88. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check ARKO's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check DADA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 500M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BWMX trades at $13.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -78.82. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BWMX's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 482.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while HZO trades at $23.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check HZO's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while ZKH trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check ZKH's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 455.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BYON trades at $8.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BYON's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while HNST trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -196.75. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HNST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check HNST's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 394.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while LE trades at $13.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 99.69. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check LE's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 355.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while JMIA trades at $4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check JMIA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 352.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while FLWS trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check FLWS's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BNED trades at $8.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BNED's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 259M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while CHPT trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check CHPT's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check FTCH's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check QRTEA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while LOGC trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check LOGC's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BZUN trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BZUN's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check VLTA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BARK-WT's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while SPWH trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check SPWH's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BARK trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BARK's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 132.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while AKA trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check AKA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check QRTEP's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check GOED's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check APRN's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while OCG trades at $4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -26.61. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check OCG's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while DIBS trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check DIBS's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while HOUR trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 181.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check HOUR's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while GRWG trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check GRWG's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while NHTC trades at $4.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 163.33. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check NHTC's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while PRTS trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN and PRTS have similar daily volatility (4.08).Check PRTS's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check QRTEB's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check CTIB's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while QVCGP trades at $5.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check QVCGP's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BBBY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BBBY's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while KIRK trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check KIRK's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check SSU's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while LGCB trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check LGCB's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while QVCGA trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check QVCGA's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check QVCGB's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while BGFV trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check BGFV's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while DTC trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DTC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check DTC's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while TLF trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check TLF's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while ZOOZ trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check ZOOZ's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while CGTL trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check CGTL's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while JBDI trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check JBDI's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while IPW trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check IPW's competition here

AMZN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMZN stands at 2.4T. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN is priced at $222.31, while MI trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMZN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.95, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, AMZN's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.Check MI's competition here