Ambipar Emergency Response

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while WM trades at $235.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check WM's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while RSG trades at $246.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check RSG's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while WCN trades at $191.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 77.02. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check WCN's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check GFLU's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while GFL trades at $48.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is -31.64. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check GFL's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while CLH trades at $238.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check CLH's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while CWST trades at $111.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 505.27. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check CWST's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SRCL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check SRCL's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check HCCI's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 766.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while MEG trades at $22.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check MEG's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 752.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while NVRI trades at $9.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check NVRI's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check HSC's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 222.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while PESI trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check PESI's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while LNZA trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check LNZA's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while QRHC trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check QRHC's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while ENGS trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check ENGS's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check LICY's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while JAN trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check JAN's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check CHRA's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while DXST trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DXST's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check DXST's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while GWAV trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check GWAV's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while AWX trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check AWX's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while CDTG trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CDTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check CDTG's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while CHNR trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check CHNR's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while AQMS trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check AQMS's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check NES's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check ECOLW's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check SMED's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check ECOL's competition here

AMBI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBI stands at 264.4M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBI is priced at $4.77, while CVA trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBI currently has a P/E ratio of -68.14, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBI's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBI is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBI.Check CVA's competition here