a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. AKA Peers
See (AKA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKA | $13.84 | -0.61% | 148.24M | -5.79 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| AMZN | $201.12 | -1.45% | 2.14T | 32.76 | $6.14 | N/A |
| BABA | $123.56 | -1.28% | 295.84B | 13.62 | $9.07 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,601.97 | +0.88% | 131.91B | 63.85 | $40.75 | N/A |
| SE | $163.20 | +0.49% | 96.62B | 114.13 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,370.49 | -1.13% | 78.10B | 33.63 | $40.75 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,870.87 | -0.24% | 64.75B | 25.98 | $149.00 | N/A |
| CVNA | $292.02 | -3.40% | 62.53B | 101.75 | $2.87 | N/A |
| CPNG | $27.38 | +0.96% | 49.71B | 195.57 | $0.14 | N/A |
| JD | $33.65 | -0.88% | 48.51B | 8.23 | $4.09 | +2.91% |
Stock Comparison
AKA vs AMZN Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.14T. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while AMZN trades at $201.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 32.76. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BABA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 295.84B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BABA trades at $123.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs MELI Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 131.91B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while MELI trades at $2,601.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 63.85. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs SE Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 96.62B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while SE trades at $163.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 114.13. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs ORLY Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while ORLY trades at $1,370.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs AZO Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 64.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while AZO trades at $3,870.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs CVNA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 62.53B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while CVNA trades at $292.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 101.75. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs CPNG Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 49.71B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while CPNG trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 195.57. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs JD Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 48.51B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while JD trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs PDD Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 41.24B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while PDD trades at $116.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs VIPS Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 37.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while VIPS trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs EBAY Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 32.99B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while EBAY trades at $71.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs TSCO Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 26.53B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while TSCO trades at $50.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs FIVE Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 24.03B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while FIVE trades at $109.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs WSM Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 20.61B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while WSM trades at $167.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs ULTA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 18.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while ULTA trades at $404.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs CHWY Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 18.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while CHWY trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 47.87. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs GPC Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.36B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while GPC trades at $125.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs CASY Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while CASY trades at $450.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BBY Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BBY trades at $70.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs DKS Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while DKS trades at $175.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs GME Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 12.55B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while GME trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 85.03. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs CART Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while CART trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs MUSA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while MUSA trades at $442.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BBWI Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BBWI trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs QVCGP Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while QVCGP trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs GLBE Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while GLBE trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -84.70. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs ETSY Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while ETSY trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs W Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while W trades at $36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas W's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs RH Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while RH trades at $195.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 53.95. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs ASO Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while ASO trades at $42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs OZON Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs AAP Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while AAP trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs MNSO Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while MNSO trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs SVV Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while SVV trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 68.86. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs EYE Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while EYE trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -58.28. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs WINA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while WINA trades at $415.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs RVLV Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while RVLV trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs TA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs EVGOW Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while EVGOW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs EVGO Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while EVGO trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs WOOF Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while WOOF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs TANNI Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs HEPS Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 899.87M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while HEPS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs RERE Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 879.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while RERE trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs SBH Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 878.79M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while SBH trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs TDUP Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 833.64M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while TDUP trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs OLPX Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 812.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while OLPX trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs LQDT Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 778.64M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while LQDT trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs OSTK Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs HNST Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 546.78M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while HNST trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -248.00. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs ARKO Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 539.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while ARKO trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 157.67. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BBW Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 534.64M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BBW trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs ODP Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 496.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while ODP trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs HZO Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 459.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while HZO trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BNED Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 357.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BNED trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BYON Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 354.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BYON trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BWMX Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 344.80M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BWMX trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -46.20. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs CHPT Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 321.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while CHPT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs FLWS Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 285.40M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while FLWS trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs LE Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 266.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while LE trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs FTCH Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.21M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BARK-WT Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 219.12M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BARK-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs LOGC Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 214.23M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while LOGC trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs QRTEA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.51M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BARK Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 213.40M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BARK trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BZUN Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 187.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BZUN trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs JMIA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 178.49M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while JMIA trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs VLTA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 149.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs DADA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 134.77M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while DADA trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs QRTEP Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130.03M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs GOED Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs WBUY Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 128.71M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while WBUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs NEGG Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 110.75M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while NEGG trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs OCG Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 109.47M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while OCG trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs APRN Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 99.98M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to APRN's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs DIBS Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 86.00M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while DIBS trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs QVCGB Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 78.68M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while QVCGB trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs SPWH Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 75.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while SPWH trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs GRWG Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 64.26M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while GRWG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs NHTC Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 51.46M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while NHTC trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 111.75. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs QRTEB Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs PRTS Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 49.06M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while PRTS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs CTIB Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs HOUR Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 44.48M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while HOUR trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BBBY Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 41.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs QVCGA Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 39.20M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while QVCGA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs SSU Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BGFV Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 26.74M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BGFV trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs KIRK Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 25.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while KIRK trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs TLF Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 25.16M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while TLF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs YSG Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 22.41M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while YSG trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs JBDI Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 21.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while JBDI trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs CGTL Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 20.80M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while CGTL trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs IPW Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 15.68M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while IPW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs ZOOZ Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 14.41M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while ZOOZ trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs BOXD Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs ZKH Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while ZKH trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.
AKA vs FTEL Comparison
AKA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 148.24M. In comparison, FTEL has a market cap of 11.11M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $13.84, while FTEL trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.79, whereas FTEL's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FTEL's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to FTEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.