Afya Limited
Afya Limited AFYA Peers
See (AFYA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFYA | $19.22 | -1.08% | 1.74B | 15.75 | $1.22 | +1.22% |
| TAL | $10.01 | -2.39% | 18.14B | 71.46 | $0.14 | N/A |
| LRN | $153.55 | +2.85% | 6.68B | 24.07 | $6.38 | N/A |
| LOPE | $195.09 | -0.33% | 5.54B | 24.54 | $7.95 | N/A |
| ATGE | $127.67 | -3.20% | 4.59B | 24.27 | $5.26 | N/A |
| GHC | $984.78 | -0.32% | 4.29B | 6.98 | $141.16 | +0.71% |
| LAUR | $22.47 | -0.18% | 3.34B | 12.08 | $1.86 | N/A |
| STRA | $89.26 | +0.27% | 2.16B | 19.07 | $4.68 | +2.70% |
| PRDO | $31.31 | +0.74% | 2.05B | 13.92 | $2.25 | +1.62% |
| UTI | $31.68 | -7.21% | 1.72B | 32.33 | $0.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AFYA vs TAL Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 18.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while TAL trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 71.46. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs LRN Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 6.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while LRN trades at $153.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs LOPE Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while LOPE trades at $195.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs ATGE Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while ATGE trades at $127.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs GHC Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while GHC trades at $984.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs LAUR Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while LAUR trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs STRA Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while STRA trades at $89.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs PRDO Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while PRDO trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs UTI Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while UTI trades at $31.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs KLC Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while KLC trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs COUR Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while COUR trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -21.65. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs GOTU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while GOTU trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs DAO Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while DAO trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 91.70. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs UDMY Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while UDMY trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs ARCE Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs EDU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 799.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while EDU trades at $48.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs REDU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.29M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs LINC Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 652.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while LINC trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs APEI Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 497.26M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while APEI trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 50.13. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs RYET Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 488.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while RYET trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -482.00. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RYET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs QSG Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 361.88M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while QSG trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs VSTA Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 327.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while VSTA trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs VTRU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.24M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs SKIL Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 177.93M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while SKIL trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs LGCY Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 92.98M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while LGCY trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs CHGG Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 83.90M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while CHGG trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs STG Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 70.34M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while STG trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs KIDZ Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 53.91M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while KIDZ trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -107.33. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs ONE Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ONE's ROE of +37.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs GNS Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 28.14M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while GNS trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs BTCT Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 26.70M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while BTCT trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs AIU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.78M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIU's ROE of +37.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs GEHI Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.25M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs EDTK Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 15.67M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while EDTK trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs AACG Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 15.34M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while AACG trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs BEDU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 12.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while BEDU trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs TEDU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.16M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs IH Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 10.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while IH trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs VEDU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs EEIQ Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 8.23M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while EEIQ trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs GV Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 8.05M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while GV trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs GSUN Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 7.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while GSUN trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs VSA Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while VSA trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs WAFU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while WAFU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs TCTM Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.92M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs CLEU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 4.78M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while CLEU trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs TWOU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs MYND Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 3.86M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while MYND trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs ASPU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 3.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while ASPU trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs METX Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.10M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs JZ Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while JZ trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JZ's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs COE Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while COE trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs FEDU Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while FEDU trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 79.79. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs KIDZW Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 1.23M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while KIDZW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs RYB Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs AMBO Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 457021.00. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while AMBO trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs YQ Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 248828.00. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while YQ trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs LXEH Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 25432.00. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while LXEH trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.
AFYA vs BTCTW Comparison
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.74B. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13555.00. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $19.22, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.