ProFrac Holding Corp.
ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDCW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACDCW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACDCW | $0.00 | -6.67% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SLB | $33.22 | +0.00% | 49.5B | 11.30 | $2.92 | +3.39% |
| BKR | $43.25 | +0.00% | 42.2B | 13.99 | $3.06 | +2.10% |
| TS | $36.05 | +0.00% | 19.4B | 9.62 | $3.70 | +4.67% |
| HAL | $21.35 | +0.00% | 18B | 9.92 | $2.13 | +3.21% |
| FTI | $35.60 | +0.00% | 14.4B | 16.66 | $2.10 | +0.57% |
| CHX | $25.81 | -2.97% | 4.9B | 17.09 | $1.51 | +1.47% |
| NOV | $12.33 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 10.07 | $1.21 | +4.19% |
| AROC | $23.93 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 17.94 | $1.33 | +3.23% |
| WFRD | $56.48 | +0.00% | 4B | 8.52 | $6.49 | +1.80% |
Stock Comparison
ACDCW vs SLB Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while SLB trades at $33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check SLB's competition here
ACDCW vs BKR Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while BKR trades at $43.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check BKR's competition here
ACDCW vs TS Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while TS trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check TS's competition here
ACDCW vs HAL Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while HAL trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check HAL's competition here
ACDCW vs FTI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while FTI trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check FTI's competition here
ACDCW vs CHX Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check CHX's competition here
ACDCW vs NOV Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NOV trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NOV's competition here
ACDCW vs AROC Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while AROC trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check AROC's competition here
ACDCW vs WFRD Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while WFRD trades at $56.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check WFRD's competition here
ACDCW vs LB Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while LB trades at $53.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check LB's competition here
ACDCW vs VAL-WT Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while VAL-WT trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check VAL-WT's competition here
ACDCW vs VAL Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while VAL trades at $46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check VAL's competition here
ACDCW vs KGS Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while KGS trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check KGS's competition here
ACDCW vs USAC Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while USAC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to USAC's ROE of +12.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check USAC's competition here
ACDCW vs TDW Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while TDW trades at $55.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check TDW's competition here
ACDCW vs WHD Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while WHD trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check WHD's competition here
ACDCW vs TDW-WT Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check TDW-WT's competition here
ACDCW vs NEX Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NEX's competition here
ACDCW vs OII Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while OII trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check OII's competition here
ACDCW vs SEI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while SEI trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 46.97. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check SEI's competition here
ACDCW vs LBRT Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while LBRT trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check LBRT's competition here
ACDCW vs DNOW Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while DNOW trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check DNOW's competition here
ACDCW vs FLOC Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while FLOC trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check FLOC's competition here
ACDCW vs AESI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while AESI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check AESI's competition here
ACDCW vs XPRO Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while XPRO trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check XPRO's competition here
ACDCW vs SLCA Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check SLCA's competition here
ACDCW vs PFHC Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check PFHC's competition here
ACDCW vs EFXT Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while EFXT trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check EFXT's competition here
ACDCW vs MRC Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while MRC trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.83. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check MRC's competition here
ACDCW vs INVX Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while INVX trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check INVX's competition here
ACDCW vs VTOL Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while VTOL trades at $37.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check VTOL's competition here
ACDCW vs RES Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 966.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while RES trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check RES's competition here
ACDCW vs HLX Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 840M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while HLX trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check HLX's competition here
ACDCW vs NPKI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 832.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NPKI trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NPKI's competition here
ACDCW vs WTTR Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 825.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while WTTR trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check WTTR's competition here
ACDCW vs NESRW Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NESRW's competition here
ACDCW vs NESR Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NESR trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NESR's competition here
ACDCW vs NR Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NR's competition here
ACDCW vs ACDC Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 567.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while ACDC trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check ACDC's competition here
ACDCW vs DRQ Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check DRQ's competition here
ACDCW vs TTI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 524.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while TTI trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check TTI's competition here
ACDCW vs SOI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check SOI's competition here
ACDCW vs PUMP Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 497.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while PUMP trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check PUMP's competition here
ACDCW vs CLB Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 489.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while CLB trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check CLB's competition here
ACDCW vs NOA Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 362.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NOA trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NOA's competition here
ACDCW vs FTK Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while FTK trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check FTK's competition here
ACDCW vs CCLP Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check CCLP's competition here
ACDCW vs NGS Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 306.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NGS trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NGS's competition here
ACDCW vs OIS Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 301.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while OIS trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check OIS's competition here
ACDCW vs FET Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while FET trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check FET's competition here
ACDCW vs RNGR Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 275.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while RNGR trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check RNGR's competition here
ACDCW vs GEOS Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 208.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while GEOS trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -15.93. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check GEOS's competition here
ACDCW vs BOOM Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while BOOM trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check BOOM's competition here
ACDCW vs PFIE Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check PFIE's competition here
ACDCW vs LSE Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while LSE trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check LSE's competition here
ACDCW vs NCSM Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NCSM trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NCSM's competition here
ACDCW vs SND Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while SND trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check SND's competition here
ACDCW vs RCON Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while RCON trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check RCON's competition here
ACDCW vs DTI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while DTI trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check DTI's competition here
ACDCW vs DWSN Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while DWSN trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check DWSN's competition here
ACDCW vs KLXE Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while KLXE trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check KLXE's competition here
ACDCW vs SDPI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check SDPI's competition here
ACDCW vs NINE Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while NINE trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check NINE's competition here
ACDCW vs ENSV Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 189.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check ENSV's competition here
ACDCW vs IO Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check IO's competition here
ACDCW vs CELP Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check CELP's competition here
ACDCW vs FTSI Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check FTSI's competition here
ACDCW vs EXTN Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check EXTN's competition here
ACDCW vs USWS Comparison August 2025
ACDCW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDCW stands at 0. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACDCW is priced at $0.00, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, ACDCW's ROE is -0.27%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDCW is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDCW.Check USWS's competition here