ProFrac Holding Corp.
ProFrac Holding Corp. ACDC Peers
See (ACDC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACDC | $6.14 | +7.91% | 983.50M | -4.09 | -$1.50 | N/A |
| SLB | $34.15 | +1.16% | 46.44B | 10.98 | $3.11 | +3.07% |
| BKR | $37.84 | -0.89% | 37.49B | 12.91 | $2.93 | +2.32% |
| TS | $34.71 | -0.23% | 18.60B | 10.58 | $3.28 | +3.86% |
| HAL | $21.23 | -0.38% | 18.25B | 8.88 | $2.39 | +3.19% |
| FTI | $31.47 | +0.61% | 13.19B | 16.65 | $1.89 | +0.64% |
| LB | $78.43 | -0.66% | 6.00B | -27.04 | -$2.90 | +0.25% |
| CHX | $26.19 | -0.27% | 5.01B | 17.34 | $1.51 | +1.45% |
| NOV | $13.09 | +0.15% | 4.92B | 8.79 | $1.49 | +2.30% |
| AROC | $25.79 | +1.30% | 4.56B | 21.67 | $1.19 | +2.80% |
Stock Comparison
ACDC vs SLB Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 46.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while SLB trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs BKR Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 37.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while BKR trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs TS Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 18.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while TS trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs HAL Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 18.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while HAL trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs FTI Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 13.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while FTI trades at $31.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs LB Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while LB trades at $78.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -27.04. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs CHX Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while CHX trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NOV Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NOV trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs AROC Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while AROC trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs WFRD Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while WFRD trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs KGS Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while KGS trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 72.35. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs WHD Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while WHD trades at $44.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs VAL-WT Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while VAL-WT trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs USAC Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while USAC trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs VAL Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while VAL trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs TDW-WT Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NEX Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs TDW Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while TDW trades at $42.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs OII Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while OII trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs LBRT Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while LBRT trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs DNOW Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while DNOW trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs AESI Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while AESI trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs SEI Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while SEI trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 46.49. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs SLCA Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs PFHC Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs MRC Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while MRC trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs RES Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while RES trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs INVX Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while INVX trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs HLX Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while HLX trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs XPRO Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 985.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while XPRO trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs WTTR Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 898.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while WTTR trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs EFXT Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 891.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while EFXT trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs VTOL Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 863.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while VTOL trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NPKI Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 714.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NPKI trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs PUMP Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 629.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while PUMP trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NR Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NESR Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 626.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NESR trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs CLB Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 571.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while CLB trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs DRQ Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs FLOC Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 525.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while FLOC trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NESRW Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 524.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NESRW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NOA Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 501.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NOA trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs SOI Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs FTK Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 437.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while FTK trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs TTI Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 399.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while TTI trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs CCLP Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NGS Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 314.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NGS trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs OIS Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 295.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while OIS trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 59.75. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs RNGR Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 272.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while RNGR trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs FET Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 202.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while FET trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs BOOM Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 144.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while BOOM trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs PFIE Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs LSE Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 89.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while LSE trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LSE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs DTI Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 88.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while DTI trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs SND Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 87.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while SND trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NCSM Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 78.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NCSM trades at $31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs GEOS Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 78.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while GEOS trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs RCON Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 49.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while RCON trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs KLXE Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 39.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while KLXE trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs DWSN Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 38.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while DWSN trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs SDPI Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs NINE Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 29.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while NINE trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.
ACDC vs ENSV Comparison
ACDC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACDC stands at 983.50M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 901833.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACDC is priced at $6.14, while ENSV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACDC currently has a P/E ratio of -4.09, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ACDC's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ACDC is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACDC.