Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while EFX trades at $148.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check EFX's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while BAH trades at $71.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check BAH's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while FCN trades at $139.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check FCN's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while HURN trades at $175.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check HURN's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while ICFI trades at $86.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check ICFI's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while CRAI trades at $178.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check CRAI's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 547.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while SBC trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check SBC's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 518.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while ROMA trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -120.33. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check ROMA's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 266.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while PPHC trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check PPHC's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while FORR trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check FORR's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while EGG trades at $4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 224.00. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check EGG's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while RGP trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check RGP's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while SDH trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check SDH's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while AERT trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AERT's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check AERT's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while RYOJ trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 289.00. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check RYOJ's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while AERTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check AERTW's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, FOFO has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while FOFO trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas FOFO's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOFO's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to FOFO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check FOFO's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while GRNQ trades at $6.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check GRNQ's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while ZTG trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check ZTG's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 210.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while VCIG trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VCIG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check VCIG's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while FGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is not fully comparable compared to FGO. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check FGO's competition here

Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACCL stands at 37.7M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACCL is priced at $2.69 on the NASDAQ, while NLSN trades at $27.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACCL currently has a P/E ratio of 67.50, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, ACCL's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACCL is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACCL.Check NLSN's competition here