Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ONDS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONDS | $7.41 | -6.44% | 3.9B | -11.40 | -$0.65 | N/A |
| CSCO | $112.69 | -3.69% | 444.2B | 27.55 | $4.09 | +1.46% |
| MSI | $422.66 | +0.89% | 70.2B | 27.11 | $15.59 | +1.12% |
| NOK | $12.06 | -6.58% | 65.1B | 30.92 | $0.39 | +1.36% |
| CIEN | $422.46 | -8.65% | 59.8B | 92.44 | $4.57 | N/A |
| LITE | $728.32 | -9.09% | 56.7B | 120.98 | $6.02 | N/A |
| CRDO | $241.91 | -6.63% | 45.1B | 70.73 | $3.42 | N/A |
| ERIC | $10.79 | -0.74% | 35.7B | 15.41 | $0.70 | +2.90% |
| UI | $525.38 | -2.05% | 31.8B | 35.59 | $14.76 | +0.61% |
| JNPR | $39.95 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 38.05 | $1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ONDS vs CSCO Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 444.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CSCO trades at $112.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CSCO's competition here
ONDS vs MSI Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MSI trades at $422.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MSI's competition here
ONDS vs NOK Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while NOK trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check NOK's competition here
ONDS vs CIEN Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CIEN trades at $422.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 92.44. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CIEN's competition here
ONDS vs LITE Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while LITE trades at $728.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 120.98. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check LITE's competition here
ONDS vs CRDO Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CRDO trades at $241.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 70.73. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CRDO's competition here
ONDS vs ERIC Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ERIC trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ERIC's competition here
ONDS vs UI Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while UI trades at $525.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check UI's competition here
ONDS vs JNPR Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check JNPR's competition here
ONDS vs ZBRA Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ZBRA trades at $267.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ZBRA's competition here
ONDS vs VSAT Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while VSAT trades at $83.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is 461.44. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check VSAT's competition here
ONDS vs VIAV Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while VIAV trades at $41.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 54.10. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check VIAV's competition here
ONDS vs REZI Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while REZI trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to REZI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check REZI's competition here
ONDS vs BDC Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while BDC trades at $115.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check BDC's competition here
ONDS vs EVLVW Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while EVLVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check EVLVW's competition here
ONDS vs MAXR Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MAXR's competition here
ONDS vs COMM Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while COMM trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to COMM's ROE of +10.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check COMM's competition here
ONDS vs EXTR Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while EXTR trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check EXTR's competition here
ONDS vs KN Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while KN trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check KN's competition here
ONDS vs VISN Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while VISN trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check VISN's competition here
ONDS vs DGII Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while DGII trades at $72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check DGII's competition here
ONDS vs INFN Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check INFN's competition here
ONDS vs HLIT Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while HLIT trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check HLIT's competition here
ONDS vs ARLO Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ARLO trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ARLO's competition here
ONDS vs SWIR Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SWIR's competition here
ONDS vs ITRN Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ITRN trades at $57.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ITRN's competition here
ONDS vs ADTN Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ADTN trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is 39.72. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ADTN's competition here
ONDS vs GILT Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 821.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while GILT trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check GILT's competition here
ONDS vs POLY Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check POLY's competition here
ONDS vs FEIM Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 635.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while FEIM trades at $64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 86.12. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check FEIM's competition here
ONDS vs AIOT Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 586.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while AIOT trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is 145.67. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check AIOT's competition here
ONDS vs NTGR Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while NTGR trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check NTGR's competition here
ONDS vs PWFL Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check PWFL's competition here
ONDS vs CLFD Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CLFD trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 188.72. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CLFD's competition here
ONDS vs BKTI Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 316.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while BKTI trades at $84.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check BKTI's competition here
ONDS vs ITI Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ITI's competition here
ONDS vs AVNW Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while AVNW trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check AVNW's competition here
ONDS vs SATX Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SATX's competition here
ONDS vs AUDC Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while AUDC trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check AUDC's competition here
ONDS vs LTRX Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 244.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while LTRX trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is 42.23. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check LTRX's competition here
ONDS vs SILC Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SILC trades at $42.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -32.76. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SILC's competition here
ONDS vs CRNT Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 217.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CRNT trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CRNT's competition here
ONDS vs INSG Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while INSG trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check INSG's competition here
ONDS vs OCC Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while OCC trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to OCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check OCC's competition here
ONDS vs PCTI Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check PCTI's competition here
ONDS vs AMPG Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while AMPG trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check AMPG's competition here
ONDS vs MOBBW Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MOBBW trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MOBBW's competition here
ONDS vs TESS Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check TESS's competition here
ONDS vs GNSS Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while GNSS trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check GNSS's competition here
ONDS vs AIRG Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while AIRG trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check AIRG's competition here
ONDS vs JCS Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check JCS's competition here
ONDS vs MOB Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MOB trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MOB's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MOB's competition here
ONDS vs CMTL Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CMTL trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CMTL's competition here
ONDS vs WTT Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check WTT's competition here
ONDS vs SYTA Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SYTA's competition here
ONDS vs BOSC Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while BOSC trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check BOSC's competition here
ONDS vs FKWL Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while FKWL trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -28.22. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check FKWL's competition here
ONDS vs ACCL Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ACCL has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ACCL trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ACCL's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ACCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to ACCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ACCL's competition here
ONDS vs UTSI Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while UTSI trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check UTSI's competition here
ONDS vs FIEE Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while FIEE trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 54.43. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check FIEE's competition here
ONDS vs MINM Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MINM's competition here
ONDS vs CLRO Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CLRO trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CLRO's competition here
ONDS vs MTEK Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MTEK trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MTEK's competition here
ONDS vs SYNX Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SYNX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SYNX's competition here
ONDS vs IOTR Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while IOTR trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check IOTR's competition here
ONDS vs MITQ Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MITQ trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -28.49. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MITQ's competition here
ONDS vs SONM Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SONM trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SONM's ROE of +6.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SONM's competition here
ONDS vs CMBM Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CMBM trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CMBM's competition here
ONDS vs CASA Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CASA's competition here
ONDS vs MYNA Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MYNA's competition here
ONDS vs AMPGW Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check AMPGW's competition here
ONDS vs ASNS Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 82K. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ASNS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ASNS's competition here
ONDS vs SYTAW Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SYTAW's competition here
ONDS vs SSNI Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SSNI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SSNI's competition here
ONDS vs MITL Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while MITL trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is -96.60. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check MITL's competition here
ONDS vs EXFO Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check EXFO's competition here
ONDS vs PLCM Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while PLCM trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is 76.91. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check PLCM's competition here
ONDS vs VCRA Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check VCRA's competition here
ONDS vs BDR Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check BDR's competition here
ONDS vs XXIA Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while XXIA trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is -47.10. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check XXIA's competition here
ONDS vs CALL Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CALL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while CALL trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas CALL's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CALL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to CALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check CALL's competition here
ONDS vs BRCD Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while BRCD trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check BRCD's competition here
ONDS vs ZXZZT Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ZXZZT trades at $32.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ZXZZT's competition here
ONDS vs SATX-WTA Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
ONDS vs NMRX Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while NMRX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check NMRX's competition here
ONDS vs ORBC Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check ORBC's competition here
ONDS vs OCLR Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while OCLR trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check OCLR's competition here
ONDS vs RKUS Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is 287.47. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check RKUS's competition here
ONDS vs GIMO Comparison July 2026
ONDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONDS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONDS is priced at $7.41, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONDS currently has a P/E ratio of -11.40, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is -1229.25. In terms of profitability, ONDS's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ONDS is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONDS.Check GIMO's competition here