Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLFD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLFD | $37.63 | +1.81% | 511.4M | 209.06 | $0.18 | N/A |
| CSCO | $118.97 | -0.63% | 468.9B | 29.09 | $4.09 | +1.39% |
| NOK | $13.98 | +1.23% | 75.5B | 35.82 | $0.39 | +1.18% |
| CIEN | $484.69 | +4.57% | 68.6B | 106.08 | $4.57 | N/A |
| LITE | $861.97 | +2.31% | 67.1B | 143.18 | $6.02 | N/A |
| MSI | $397.01 | -0.90% | 65.9B | 25.47 | $15.59 | +1.18% |
| CRDO | $268.03 | -0.36% | 50B | 78.37 | $3.42 | N/A |
| ERIC | $11.06 | -0.90% | 36.6B | 15.80 | $0.70 | +2.82% |
| UI | $541.10 | -1.62% | 32.8B | 36.68 | $14.76 | +0.59% |
| SATS | $97.19 | -2.67% | 27.8B | -54.58 | -$1.77 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLFD vs CSCO Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 468.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CSCO trades at $118.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CSCO's competition here
CLFD vs NOK Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while NOK trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check NOK's competition here
CLFD vs CIEN Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CIEN trades at $484.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 106.08. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CIEN's competition here
CLFD vs LITE Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while LITE trades at $861.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 143.18. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check LITE's competition here
CLFD vs MSI Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while MSI trades at $397.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MSI's competition here
CLFD vs CRDO Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CRDO trades at $268.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 78.37. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CRDO's competition here
CLFD vs ERIC Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ERIC trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ERIC's competition here
CLFD vs UI Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while UI trades at $541.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check UI's competition here
CLFD vs SATS Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SATS trades at $97.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -54.58. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SATS's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SATS's competition here
CLFD vs ASTS Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ASTS trades at $65.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -36.87. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ASTS's competition here
CLFD vs JNPR Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check JNPR's competition here
CLFD vs VIAV Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while VIAV trades at $50.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 65.51. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VIAV's competition here
CLFD vs ZBRA Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ZBRA trades at $243.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ZBRA's competition here
CLFD vs VSAT Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while VSAT trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VSAT's competition here
CLFD vs BDC Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while BDC trades at $121.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BDC's competition here
CLFD vs EXTR Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while EXTR trades at $30.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check EXTR's competition here
CLFD vs MAXR Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MAXR's competition here
CLFD vs ONDS Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ONDS trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ONDS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ONDS's competition here
CLFD vs COMM Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while COMM trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COMM's ROE of +10.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check COMM's competition here
CLFD vs KN Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while KN trades at $40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 56.59. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check KN's competition here
CLFD vs YSS Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, YSS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while YSS trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas YSS's P/E ratio is -17.59. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to YSS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to YSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check YSS's competition here
CLFD vs VISN Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while VISN trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VISN's competition here
CLFD vs DGII Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while DGII trades at $69.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check DGII's competition here
CLFD vs HLIT Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while HLIT trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check HLIT's competition here
CLFD vs INFN Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check INFN's competition here
CLFD vs ITRN Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ITRN trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ITRN's competition here
CLFD vs SWIR Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SWIR's competition here
CLFD vs ADTN Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ADTN trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is 43.87. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ADTN's competition here
CLFD vs POLY Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check POLY's competition here
CLFD vs GILT Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 755.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while GILT trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check GILT's competition here
CLFD vs TSAT Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 617.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while TSAT trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check TSAT's competition here
CLFD vs FEIM Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 616M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while FEIM trades at $62.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 83.45. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check FEIM's competition here
CLFD vs NTGR Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 611.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while NTGR trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check NTGR's competition here
CLFD vs AIOT Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 497.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while AIOT trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is 123.67. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AIOT's competition here
CLFD vs PWFL Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check PWFL's competition here
CLFD vs ITI Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ITI's competition here
CLFD vs BKTI Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 304.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while BKTI trades at $81.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BKTI's competition here
CLFD vs AVNW Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while AVNW trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AVNW's competition here
CLFD vs SATX Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SATX's competition here
CLFD vs LTRX Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while LTRX trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is 40.92. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check LTRX's competition here
CLFD vs SILC Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 235.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SILC trades at $40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -31.70. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SILC's competition here
CLFD vs AUDC Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 229.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while AUDC trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AUDC's competition here
CLFD vs CRNT Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 213.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CRNT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CRNT's competition here
CLFD vs KVHI Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 181.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while KVHI trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -35.77. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check KVHI's competition here
CLFD vs INSG Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while INSG trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check INSG's competition here
CLFD vs OCC Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while OCC trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is 152.67. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check OCC's competition here
CLFD vs AMPG Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while AMPG trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -22.52. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AMPG's competition here
CLFD vs PCTI Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check PCTI's competition here
CLFD vs TESS Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check TESS's competition here
CLFD vs AIRG Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while AIRG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AIRG's competition here
CLFD vs JCS Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check JCS's competition here
CLFD vs CMTL Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CMTL trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CMTL's competition here
CLFD vs MOB Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while MOB trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MOB's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MOB's competition here
CLFD vs WTT Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check WTT's competition here
CLFD vs SYTA Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SYTA's competition here
CLFD vs BOSC Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while BOSC trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BOSC's competition here
CLFD vs FKWL Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while FKWL trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -28.11. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check FKWL's competition here
CLFD vs MOBBW Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while MOBBW trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MOBBW's competition here
CLFD vs UTSI Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while UTSI trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check UTSI's competition here
CLFD vs FIEE Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while FIEE trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 57.56. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check FIEE's competition here
CLFD vs MINM Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MINM's competition here
CLFD vs IOTR Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while IOTR trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check IOTR's competition here
CLFD vs SYNX Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SYNX trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SYNX's competition here
CLFD vs MITQ Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while MITQ trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -29.02. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MITQ's competition here
CLFD vs CLRO Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CLRO trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CLRO's competition here
CLFD vs SONM Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SONM trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SONM's ROE of +6.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SONM's competition here
CLFD vs CMBM Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CMBM trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CMBM's competition here
CLFD vs CASA Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CASA's competition here
CLFD vs MYNA Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MYNA's competition here
CLFD vs AMPGW Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AMPGW's competition here
CLFD vs ASNS Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 82K. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ASNS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ASNS's competition here
CLFD vs SYTAW Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SYTAW's competition here
CLFD vs CALL Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, CALL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while CALL trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas CALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CALL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to CALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CALL's competition here
CLFD vs SATX-WTA Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
CLFD vs EXFO Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check EXFO's competition here
CLFD vs NMRX Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while NMRX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check NMRX's competition here
CLFD vs GIMO Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check GIMO's competition here
CLFD vs VCRA Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VCRA's competition here
CLFD vs SSNI Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while SSNI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SSNI's competition here
CLFD vs BDR Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BDR's competition here
CLFD vs BRCD Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while BRCD trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BRCD's competition here
CLFD vs PLCM Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while PLCM trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check PLCM's competition here
CLFD vs OCLR Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while OCLR trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check OCLR's competition here
CLFD vs RKUS Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check RKUS's competition here
CLFD vs ORBC Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ORBC's competition here
CLFD vs MITL Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while MITL trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MITL's competition here
CLFD vs XXIA Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while XXIA trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check XXIA's competition here
CLFD vs ZXZZT Comparison June 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 511.4M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $37.63, while ZXZZT trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 209.06, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ZXZZT's competition here