Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FKWL's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FKWL and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FKWL | $2.36 | -0.80% | 27.8M | -26.22 | -$0.09 | +1.68% |
| CSCO | $110.06 | -1.85% | 433.8B | 26.91 | $4.09 | +1.49% |
| MSI | $474.13 | +1.71% | 78.7B | 28.86 | $16.43 | +1.01% |
| LITE | $835.03 | -9.92% | 65B | 138.71 | $6.02 | N/A |
| NOK | $9.65 | -13.30% | 52.1B | 24.76 | $0.39 | +1.47% |
| CIEN | $319.64 | -8.55% | 45.2B | 53.18 | $6.01 | N/A |
| UI | $552.91 | -1.99% | 33.5B | 34.71 | $15.95 | +0.61% |
| ERIC | $10.05 | -2.52% | 33B | 12.91 | $0.78 | +3.05% |
| ZBRA | $351.81 | +0.41% | 16.8B | 18.22 | $19.31 | N/A |
| JNPR | $39.95 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 38.05 | $1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO)
FKWL vs CSCO Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 433.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CSCO trades at $110.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CSCO's competition here
Motorola Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: MSI)
FKWL vs MSI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MSI trades at $474.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MSI's competition here
Lumentum Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LITE)
FKWL vs LITE Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while LITE trades at $835.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 138.71. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LITE's ROE of -3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check LITE's competition here
Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK)
FKWL vs NOK Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NOK trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to NOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check NOK's competition here
Ciena Corporation (NYSE: CIEN)
FKWL vs CIEN Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CIEN trades at $319.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 53.18. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CIEN's competition here
Ubiquiti Inc. (NYSE: UI)
FKWL vs UI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while UI trades at $552.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UI's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check UI's competition here
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (NASDAQ: ERIC)
FKWL vs ERIC Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ERIC trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ERIC's competition here
Zebra Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ZBRA)
FKWL vs ZBRA Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ZBRA trades at $351.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ZBRA's competition here
Juniper Networks, Inc. (NYSE: JNPR)
FKWL vs JNPR Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check JNPR's competition here
Viasat, Inc. (NASDAQ: VSAT)
FKWL vs VSAT Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while VSAT trades at $71.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -298.50. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check VSAT's competition here
Viavi Solutions Inc. (NASDAQ: VIAV)
FKWL vs VIAV Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while VIAV trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 34.51. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check VIAV's competition here
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAOI)
FKWL vs AAOI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AAOI trades at $95.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -290.18. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AAOI's competition here
Belden Inc. (NYSE: BDC)
FKWL vs BDC Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BDC trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BDC's competition here
Ondas Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ONDS)
FKWL vs ONDS Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ONDS trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ONDS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ONDS's competition here
Maxar Technologies Inc. (NYSE: MAXR)
FKWL vs MAXR Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MAXR's competition here
CommScope Holding Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: COMM)
FKWL vs COMM Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while COMM trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COMM's ROE of +4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check COMM's competition here
Extreme Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXTR)
FKWL vs EXTR Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while EXTR trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check EXTR's competition here
Digi International Inc. (NASDAQ: DGII)
FKWL vs DGII Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while DGII trades at $66.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check DGII's competition here
Calix, Inc. (NYSE: CALX)
FKWL vs CALX Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CALX trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CALX's competition here
Infinera Corporation (NASDAQ: INFN)
FKWL vs INFN Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check INFN's competition here
Arlo Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: ARLO)
FKWL vs ARLO Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ARLO trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ARLO's competition here
Vistance Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: VISN)
FKWL vs VISN Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while VISN trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to VISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check VISN's competition here
Harmonic Inc. (NASDAQ: HLIT)
FKWL vs HLIT Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while HLIT trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check HLIT's competition here
Sierra Wireless, Inc. (NASDAQ: SWIR)
FKWL vs SWIR Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SWIR's competition here
Frequency Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: FEIM)
FKWL vs FEIM Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 843.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while FEIM trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 342.00. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check FEIM's competition here
Plantronics, Inc. (NYSE: POLY)
FKWL vs POLY Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check POLY's competition here
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (NASDAQ: GILT)
FKWL vs GILT Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 732.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while GILT trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check GILT's competition here
NETGEAR, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTGR)
FKWL vs NTGR Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 575.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NTGR trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check NTGR's competition here
ADTRAN Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ADTN)
FKWL vs ADTN Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 570.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ADTN trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ADTN's competition here
PowerFleet, Inc. (NASDAQ: PWFL)
FKWL vs PWFL Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check PWFL's competition here
Clearfield, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLFD)
FKWL vs CLFD Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CLFD trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 99.07. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CLFD's competition here
Iteris, Inc. (NASDAQ: ITI)
FKWL vs ITI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ITI's competition here
BK Technologies Corporation (AMEX: BKTI)
FKWL vs BKTI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 269.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BKTI trades at $71.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BKTI's competition here
Satixfy Communications Ltd. (AMEX: SATX)
FKWL vs SATX Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SATX's competition here
Aviat Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVNW)
FKWL vs AVNW Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 255.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AVNW trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AVNW's competition here
AudioCodes Ltd. (NASDAQ: AUDC)
FKWL vs AUDC Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 246.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AUDC trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AUDC's competition here
Silicom Ltd. (NASDAQ: SILC)
FKWL vs SILC Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SILC trades at $41.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -31.55. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SILC's competition here
Lantronix, Inc. (NASDAQ: LTRX)
FKWL vs LTRX Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while LTRX trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check LTRX's competition here
Ceragon Networks Ltd. (NASDAQ: CRNT)
FKWL vs CRNT Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 184.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CRNT trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CRNT's competition here
KVH Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: KVHI)
FKWL vs KVHI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while KVHI trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -27.12. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check KVHI's competition here
PCTEL, Inc. (NASDAQ: PCTI)
FKWL vs PCTI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check PCTI's competition here
Optical Cable Corporation (NASDAQ: OCC)
FKWL vs OCC Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while OCC trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is 45.52. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check OCC's competition here
AmpliTech Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMPG)
FKWL vs AMPG Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AMPG trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -9.94. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AMPG's competition here
TESSCO Technologies Incorporated (NASDAQ: TESS)
FKWL vs TESS Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check TESS's competition here
Communications Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: JCS)
FKWL vs JCS Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check JCS's competition here
Inseego Corp. (NASDAQ: INSG)
FKWL vs INSG Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while INSG trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check INSG's competition here
Genasys Inc. (NASDAQ: GNSS)
FKWL vs GNSS Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while GNSS trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check GNSS's competition here
Airgain, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIRG)
FKWL vs AIRG Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AIRG trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -64.87. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AIRG's competition here
Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (AMEX: WTT)
FKWL vs WTT Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check WTT's competition here
Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (NASDAQ: CMTL)
FKWL vs CMTL Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CMTL trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CMTL's competition here
Siyata Mobile Inc. (NASDAQ: SYTA)
FKWL vs SYTA Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SYTA's competition here
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (NASDAQ: BOSC)
FKWL vs BOSC Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BOSC trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BOSC's competition here
FiEE, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIEE)
FKWL vs FIEE Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while FIEE trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check FIEE's competition here
UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: UTSI)
FKWL vs UTSI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while UTSI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check UTSI's competition here
Nuran Wireless Inc (NASDAQ: NUR)
FKWL vs NUR Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, NUR has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NUR trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas NUR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NUR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to NUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check NUR's competition here
Minim, Inc. (NASDAQ: MINM)
FKWL vs MINM Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MINM's competition here
ClearOne, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLRO)
FKWL vs CLRO Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CLRO trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -27.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CLRO's competition here
Universal Safety Products, Inc. (AMEX: UUU)
FKWL vs UUU Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while UUU trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UUU's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check UUU's competition here
Maris-Tech Ltd. (NASDAQ: MTEKW)
FKWL vs MTEKW Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MTEKW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MTEKW's competition here
Maris-Tech Ltd. (NASDAQ: MTEK)
FKWL vs MTEK Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MTEK trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MTEK's competition here
Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. (AMEX: MITQ)
FKWL vs MITQ Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MITQ trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -32.38. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MITQ's competition here
Silynxcom Ltd. (AMEX: SYNX)
FKWL vs SYNX Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SYNX trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SYNX's competition here
DNA X, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONM)
FKWL vs SONM Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SONM trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SONM's ROE of +3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SONM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SONM's competition here
Cambium Networks Corporation (NASDAQ: CMBM)
FKWL vs CMBM Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CMBM trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CMBM's competition here
Casa Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CASA)
FKWL vs CASA Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CASA's competition here
Mynaric AG (NASDAQ: MYNA)
FKWL vs MYNA Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MYNA's competition here
AmpliTech Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMPGW)
FKWL vs AMPGW Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AMPGW's competition here
Actelis Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASNS)
FKWL vs ASNS Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ASNS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ASNS's competition here
Siyata Mobile Inc. (NASDAQ: SYTAW)
FKWL vs SYTAW Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SYTAW's competition here
Oclaro, Inc. (NASDAQ: OCLR)
FKWL vs OCLR Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while OCLR trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check OCLR's competition here
Gigamon Inc. (NYSE: GIMO)
FKWL vs GIMO Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is -1734.23. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check GIMO's competition here
Ixia (NASDAQ: XXIA)
FKWL vs XXIA Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while XXIA trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is -54.24. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check XXIA's competition here
EXFO Inc. (NASDAQ: EXFO)
FKWL vs EXFO Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check EXFO's competition here
Satixfy Communications Ltd. (NYSE: SATX-WTA)
FKWL vs SATX-WTA Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
SuperMontage TEST (NASDAQ: ZXZZT)
FKWL vs ZXZZT Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ZXZZT trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ZXZZT's competition here
Polycom, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLCM)
FKWL vs PLCM Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PLCM trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is 73.01. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check PLCM's competition here
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRCD)
FKWL vs BRCD Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BRCD trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BRCD's competition here
Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. (AMEX: BDR)
FKWL vs BDR Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BDR's competition here
Mitel Networks Corporation (NASDAQ: MITL)
FKWL vs MITL Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MITL trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is -96.60. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MITL's competition here
ORBCOMM Inc. (NASDAQ: ORBC)
FKWL vs ORBC Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ORBC's competition here
Silver Spring Networks, Inc. (NYSE: SSNI)
FKWL vs SSNI Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SSNI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is -21.97. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SSNI's competition here
Vocera Communications, Inc. (NYSE: VCRA)
FKWL vs VCRA Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check VCRA's competition here
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL)
FKWL vs CALL Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, CALL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CALL trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas CALL's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CALL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CALL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CALL's competition here
Numerex Corp (NASDAQ: NMRX)
FKWL vs NMRX Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NMRX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check NMRX's competition here
Ruckus Wireless, Inc. (NYSE: RKUS)
FKWL vs RKUS Comparison September 2026
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 27.8M. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -26.22, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is 256.37. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check RKUS's competition here