Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 457.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CSCO trades at $115.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CSCO's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while MSI trades at $435.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check MSI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while LITE trades at $713.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 118.59. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check LITE's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CIEN trades at $377.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 82.46. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CIEN's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while UI trades at $556.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check UI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ERIC trades at $9.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ERIC's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ZBRA trades at $293.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ZBRA's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while JNPR trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check JNPR's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while VSAT trades at $76.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is 427.39. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check VSAT's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while VIAV trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check VIAV's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while AAOI trades at $94.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -285.82. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check AAOI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while REZI trades at $34.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to REZI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check REZI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while BDC trades at $124.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check BDC's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ONDS trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ONDS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ONDS's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while MAXR trades at $52.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check MAXR's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while COMM trades at $17.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COMM's ROE of +10.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check COMM's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while EXTR trades at $30.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check EXTR's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while VISN trades at $11.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check VISN's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while DGII trades at $69.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check DGII's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CALX trades at $35.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CALX's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while INFN trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check INFN's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ARLO trades at $14.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ARLO's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while HLIT trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check HLIT's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SWIR trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SWIR's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ITRN trades at $55.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ITRN's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 834M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while GILT trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check GILT's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while POLY trades at $39.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check POLY's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 689.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ADTN trades at $8.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ADTN's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 648.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while NTGR trades at $24.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check NTGR's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 572.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while FEIM trades at $57.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 77.29. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FEIM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check FEIM's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while PWFL trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check PWFL's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CLFD trades at $30.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 168.11. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CLFD's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ITI trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ITI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 299.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while BKTI trades at $80.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check BKTI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while AVNW trades at $20.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check AVNW's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SATX trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SATX's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while AUDC trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check AUDC's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while LTRX trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check LTRX's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SILC trades at $39.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -30.64. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SILC's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 197.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CRNT trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CRNT's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while KVHI trades at $9.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -35.62. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check KVHI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while PCTI trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check PCTI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while OCC trades at $14.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is 123.83. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check OCC's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 117.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while AMPG trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check AMPG's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while INSG trades at $7.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to INSG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check INSG's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while TESS trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check TESS's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while JCS trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check JCS's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while GNSS trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check GNSS's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while AIRG trades at $5.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check AIRG's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CMTL trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CMTL's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while MOBBW trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check MOBBW's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while WTT trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check WTT's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SYTA trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SYTA's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while BOSC trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check BOSC's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while FKWL trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check FKWL's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while UTSI trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check UTSI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while MINM trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check MINM's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while FIEE trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check FIEE's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while MTEK trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check MTEK's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while IOTR trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check IOTR's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CLRO trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CLRO's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SYNX trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SYNX's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while MITQ trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -26.57. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check MITQ's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SONM trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SONM's ROE of +6.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SONM's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CMBM trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CMBM's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CASA trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CASA's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, FXHO has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while FXHO trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas FXHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FXHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to FXHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check FXHO's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while MYNA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check MYNA's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check AMPGW's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 983.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ASNS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ASNS's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 724.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while EVLVW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check EVLVW's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SYTAW's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while BRCD trades at $12.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check BRCD's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while RKUS trades at $12.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is 256.37. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check RKUS's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, CALL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while CALL trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas CALL's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CALL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to CALL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check CALL's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ZXZZT trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ZXZZT's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while MITL trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is -96.60. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check MITL's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while ORBC trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check ORBC's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SSNI trades at $16.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is -21.97. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SSNI's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while VCRA trades at $79.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check VCRA's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check SATX-WTA's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while BDR trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check BDR's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while NMRX trades at $3.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check NMRX's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while OCLR trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check OCLR's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while EXFO trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check EXFO's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while PLCM trades at $12.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is 73.01. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check PLCM's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while GIMO trades at $38.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is -1734.23. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check GIMO's competition here

Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOK stands at 49.1B. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOK is priced at $9.14 on the NYSE, while XXIA trades at $19.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.33, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is -54.24. In terms of profitability, NOK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOK is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOK.Check XXIA's competition here