magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CALL's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CALL and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALL | $10.74 | +0.00% | 0 | 26.89 | $0.40 | +13.97% |
| CSCO | $115.99 | +2.14% | 457.2B | 28.36 | $4.09 | +1.43% |
| MSI | $435.75 | +1.14% | 72.4B | 27.96 | $15.59 | +1.08% |
| LITE | $713.94 | +2.99% | 55.5B | 118.59 | $6.02 | N/A |
| CIEN | $377.05 | +1.34% | 53.3B | 82.46 | $4.57 | N/A |
| NOK | $9.14 | +0.55% | 49.1B | 23.33 | $0.39 | +1.78% |
| UI | $556.52 | +4.37% | 33.7B | 37.74 | $14.76 | +0.58% |
| ERIC | $9.81 | +0.41% | 32.2B | 16.64 | $0.59 | +3.19% |
| ZBRA | $293.82 | +1.82% | 14B | 17.73 | $16.57 | N/A |
| JNPR | $39.95 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 38.05 | $1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO)
CALL vs CSCO Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 457.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CSCO trades at $115.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CSCO's competition here
Motorola Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: MSI)
CALL vs MSI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while MSI trades at $435.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check MSI's competition here
Lumentum Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LITE)
CALL vs LITE Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while LITE trades at $713.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 118.59. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check LITE's competition here
Ciena Corporation (NYSE: CIEN)
CALL vs CIEN Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CIEN trades at $377.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 82.46. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CIEN's competition here
Nokia Oyj (NYSE: NOK)
CALL vs NOK Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while NOK trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to NOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check NOK's competition here
Ubiquiti Inc. (NYSE: UI)
CALL vs UI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while UI trades at $556.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check UI's competition here
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (NASDAQ: ERIC)
CALL vs ERIC Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ERIC trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ERIC's competition here
Zebra Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ZBRA)
CALL vs ZBRA Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ZBRA trades at $293.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ZBRA's competition here
Juniper Networks, Inc. (NYSE: JNPR)
CALL vs JNPR Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check JNPR's competition here
Viasat, Inc. (NASDAQ: VSAT)
CALL vs VSAT Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while VSAT trades at $76.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is 427.39. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check VSAT's competition here
Viavi Solutions Inc. (NASDAQ: VIAV)
CALL vs VIAV Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while VIAV trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check VIAV's competition here
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAOI)
CALL vs AAOI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while AAOI trades at $94.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -285.82. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check AAOI's competition here
Resideo Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: REZI)
CALL vs REZI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while REZI trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to REZI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check REZI's competition here
Belden Inc. (NYSE: BDC)
CALL vs BDC Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while BDC trades at $124.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check BDC's competition here
Ondas Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ONDS)
CALL vs ONDS Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ONDS trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ONDS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ONDS's competition here
Maxar Technologies Inc. (NYSE: MAXR)
CALL vs MAXR Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check MAXR's competition here
CommScope Holding Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: COMM)
CALL vs COMM Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while COMM trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to COMM's ROE of +10.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check COMM's competition here
Extreme Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXTR)
CALL vs EXTR Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while EXTR trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check EXTR's competition here
Vistance Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: VISN)
CALL vs VISN Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while VISN trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check VISN's competition here
Digi International Inc. (NASDAQ: DGII)
CALL vs DGII Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while DGII trades at $69.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check DGII's competition here
Calix, Inc. (NYSE: CALX)
CALL vs CALX Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CALX trades at $35.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CALX's competition here
Infinera Corporation (NASDAQ: INFN)
CALL vs INFN Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check INFN's competition here
Arlo Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: ARLO)
CALL vs ARLO Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ARLO trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ARLO's competition here
Harmonic Inc. (NASDAQ: HLIT)
CALL vs HLIT Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while HLIT trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check HLIT's competition here
Sierra Wireless, Inc. (NASDAQ: SWIR)
CALL vs SWIR Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SWIR's competition here
Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (NASDAQ: ITRN)
CALL vs ITRN Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ITRN trades at $55.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ITRN's competition here
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (NASDAQ: GILT)
CALL vs GILT Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 834M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while GILT trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check GILT's competition here
Plantronics, Inc. (NYSE: POLY)
CALL vs POLY Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check POLY's competition here
ADTRAN Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ADTN)
CALL vs ADTN Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 689.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ADTN trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ADTN's competition here
NETGEAR, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTGR)
CALL vs NTGR Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 648.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while NTGR trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check NTGR's competition here
Frequency Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: FEIM)
CALL vs FEIM Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 572.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while FEIM trades at $57.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 77.29. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FEIM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check FEIM's competition here
PowerFleet, Inc. (NASDAQ: PWFL)
CALL vs PWFL Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check PWFL's competition here
Clearfield, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLFD)
CALL vs CLFD Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CLFD trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 168.11. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CLFD's competition here
Iteris, Inc. (NASDAQ: ITI)
CALL vs ITI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ITI's competition here
BK Technologies Corporation (AMEX: BKTI)
CALL vs BKTI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 299.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while BKTI trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check BKTI's competition here
Aviat Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVNW)
CALL vs AVNW Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while AVNW trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check AVNW's competition here
Satixfy Communications Ltd. (AMEX: SATX)
CALL vs SATX Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SATX's competition here
AudioCodes Ltd. (NASDAQ: AUDC)
CALL vs AUDC Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while AUDC trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check AUDC's competition here
Lantronix, Inc. (NASDAQ: LTRX)
CALL vs LTRX Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while LTRX trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check LTRX's competition here
Silicom Ltd. (NASDAQ: SILC)
CALL vs SILC Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SILC trades at $39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -30.64. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SILC's competition here
Ceragon Networks Ltd. (NASDAQ: CRNT)
CALL vs CRNT Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 197.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CRNT trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CRNT's competition here
KVH Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: KVHI)
CALL vs KVHI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while KVHI trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -35.62. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check KVHI's competition here
PCTEL, Inc. (NASDAQ: PCTI)
CALL vs PCTI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check PCTI's competition here
Optical Cable Corporation (NASDAQ: OCC)
CALL vs OCC Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while OCC trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is 123.83. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to OCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check OCC's competition here
AmpliTech Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMPG)
CALL vs AMPG Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 117.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while AMPG trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check AMPG's competition here
Inseego Corp. (NASDAQ: INSG)
CALL vs INSG Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while INSG trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check INSG's competition here
TESSCO Technologies Incorporated (NASDAQ: TESS)
CALL vs TESS Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check TESS's competition here
Communications Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: JCS)
CALL vs JCS Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check JCS's competition here
Genasys Inc. (NASDAQ: GNSS)
CALL vs GNSS Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while GNSS trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check GNSS's competition here
Airgain, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIRG)
CALL vs AIRG Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while AIRG trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check AIRG's competition here
Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (NASDAQ: CMTL)
CALL vs CMTL Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CMTL trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CMTL's competition here
Mobilicom Limited (NASDAQ: MOBBW)
CALL vs MOBBW Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while MOBBW trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check MOBBW's competition here
Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (AMEX: WTT)
CALL vs WTT Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check WTT's competition here
Siyata Mobile Inc. (NASDAQ: SYTA)
CALL vs SYTA Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SYTA's competition here
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (NASDAQ: BOSC)
CALL vs BOSC Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while BOSC trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check BOSC's competition here
Franklin Wireless Corp. (NASDAQ: FKWL)
CALL vs FKWL Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while FKWL trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check FKWL's competition here
UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: UTSI)
CALL vs UTSI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while UTSI trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check UTSI's competition here
Minim, Inc. (NASDAQ: MINM)
CALL vs MINM Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check MINM's competition here
FiEE, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIEE)
CALL vs FIEE Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while FIEE trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check FIEE's competition here
Maris-Tech Ltd. (NASDAQ: MTEK)
CALL vs MTEK Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while MTEK trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check MTEK's competition here
iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: IOTR)
CALL vs IOTR Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while IOTR trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check IOTR's competition here
ClearOne, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLRO)
CALL vs CLRO Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CLRO trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CLRO's competition here
Silynxcom Ltd. (AMEX: SYNX)
CALL vs SYNX Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SYNX trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SYNX's competition here
Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. (AMEX: MITQ)
CALL vs MITQ Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while MITQ trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -26.57. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check MITQ's competition here
DNA X, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONM)
CALL vs SONM Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SONM trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SONM's ROE of +6.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SONM's competition here
Cambium Networks Corporation (NASDAQ: CMBM)
CALL vs CMBM Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CMBM trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CMBM's competition here
Casa Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CASA)
CALL vs CASA Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check CASA's competition here
UTime Limited (NASDAQ: FXHO)
CALL vs FXHO Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, FXHO has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while FXHO trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FXHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FXHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to FXHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check FXHO's competition here
Mynaric AG (NASDAQ: MYNA)
CALL vs MYNA Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check MYNA's competition here
AmpliTech Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMPGW)
CALL vs AMPGW Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check AMPGW's competition here
Actelis Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASNS)
CALL vs ASNS Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 983.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ASNS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ASNS's competition here
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EVLVW)
CALL vs EVLVW Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 724.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while EVLVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check EVLVW's competition here
Siyata Mobile Inc. (NASDAQ: SYTAW)
CALL vs SYTAW Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SYTAW's competition here
Ixia (NASDAQ: XXIA)
CALL vs XXIA Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while XXIA trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is -54.24. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check XXIA's competition here
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRCD)
CALL vs BRCD Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while BRCD trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check BRCD's competition here
Ruckus Wireless, Inc. (NYSE: RKUS)
CALL vs RKUS Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is 256.37. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check RKUS's competition here
Oclaro, Inc. (NASDAQ: OCLR)
CALL vs OCLR Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while OCLR trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check OCLR's competition here
SuperMontage TEST (NASDAQ: ZXZZT)
CALL vs ZXZZT Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ZXZZT trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ZXZZT's competition here
Gigamon Inc. (NYSE: GIMO)
CALL vs GIMO Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is -1734.23. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check GIMO's competition here
Mitel Networks Corporation (NASDAQ: MITL)
CALL vs MITL Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while MITL trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is -96.60. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check MITL's competition here
ORBCOMM Inc. (NASDAQ: ORBC)
CALL vs ORBC Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check ORBC's competition here
Silver Spring Networks, Inc. (NYSE: SSNI)
CALL vs SSNI Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SSNI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is -21.97. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SSNI's competition here
Vocera Communications, Inc. (NYSE: VCRA)
CALL vs VCRA Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check VCRA's competition here
Satixfy Communications Ltd. (NYSE: SATX-WTA)
CALL vs SATX-WTA Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
EXFO Inc. (NASDAQ: EXFO)
CALL vs EXFO Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check EXFO's competition here
Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. (AMEX: BDR)
CALL vs BDR Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check BDR's competition here
Numerex Corp (NASDAQ: NMRX)
CALL vs NMRX Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while NMRX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is less volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check NMRX's competition here
Polycom, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLCM)
CALL vs PLCM Comparison August 2026
magicJack VocalTec Ltd. (NASDAQ: CALL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CALL stands at 0. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CALL is priced at $10.74 on the NASDAQ, while PLCM trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CALL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is 73.01. In terms of profitability, CALL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CALL is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CALL.Check PLCM's competition here