Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. AAP Peers
See (AAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAP | $34.16 | -0.64% | 2.04B | -3.47 | -$9.84 | +2.91% |
| AMZN | $204.07 | -1.01% | 2.17T | 33.18 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $125.16 | +1.79% | 305.80B | 13.80 | $9.07 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,579.21 | +0.03% | 130.76B | 63.56 | $40.58 | N/A |
| SE | $162.38 | -0.21% | 96.13B | 113.55 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,386.22 | -0.55% | 79.00B | 33.94 | $40.84 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,880.15 | +0.00% | 64.91B | 26.04 | $148.99 | N/A |
| CVNA | $302.29 | -0.96% | 64.73B | 104.96 | $2.88 | N/A |
| CPNG | $27.12 | -0.15% | 49.24B | 193.71 | $0.14 | N/A |
| JD | $33.95 | +0.77% | 48.94B | 8.30 | $4.09 | +2.89% |
Stock Comparison
AAP vs AMZN Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.17T. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while AMZN trades at $204.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BABA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 305.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BABA trades at $125.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs MELI Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 130.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while MELI trades at $2,579.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 63.56. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs SE Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 96.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while SE trades at $162.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 113.55. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs ORLY Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 79.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while ORLY trades at $1,386.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs AZO Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 64.91B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while AZO trades at $3,880.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs CVNA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 64.73B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while CVNA trades at $302.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 104.96. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs CPNG Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 49.24B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while CPNG trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 193.71. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs JD Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 48.94B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while JD trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs PDD Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 41.66B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while PDD trades at $117.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs VIPS Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 36.94B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while VIPS trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs EBAY Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 33.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while EBAY trades at $72.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs TSCO Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.36B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while TSCO trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs FIVE Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 24.65B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while FIVE trades at $111.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs WSM Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while WSM trades at $172.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs ULTA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 18.71B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while ULTA trades at $414.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs CHWY Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 18.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while CHWY trades at $44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 48.48. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs GPC Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.77B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while GPC trades at $128.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs CASY Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 17.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while CASY trades at $458.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BBY Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BBY trades at $71.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs DKS Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.66B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while DKS trades at $183.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs GME Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 12.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while GME trades at $28.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 86.39. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs CART Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.28B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while CART trades at $47.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs MUSA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while MUSA trades at $456.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BBWI Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 7.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BBWI trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs QVCGP Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while QVCGP trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs GLBE Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while GLBE trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -88.35. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs ETSY Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while ETSY trades at $47.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs W Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while W trades at $38.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas W's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs RH Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while RH trades at $207.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 57.17. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs ASO Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while ASO trades at $44.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs OZON Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs MNSO Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while MNSO trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs SVV Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while SVV trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 70.79. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs EYE Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while EYE trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -60.56. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs WINA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while WINA trades at $426.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs RVLV Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while RVLV trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs TA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs EVGOW Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while EVGOW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs EVGO Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while EVGO trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs WOOF Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while WOOF trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs TANNI Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs SBH Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 936.80M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while SBH trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs HEPS Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 896.49M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while HEPS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.64. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs RERE Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 889.30M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while RERE trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is -53.40. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs OLPX Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 852.38M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while OLPX trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs TDUP Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 849.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while TDUP trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -24.76. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs LQDT Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 775.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while LQDT trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs OSTK Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs HNST Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 593.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while HNST trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -269.00. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs ARKO Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 570.91M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while ARKO trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 167.00. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BBW Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 549.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BBW trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs ODP Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 521.93M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while ODP trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs HZO Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 497.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while HZO trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BYON Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 382.99M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BYON trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BNED Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 374.59M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BNED trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BWMX Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 349.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BWMX trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -46.85. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs CHPT Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 321.58M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while CHPT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs FLWS Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 295.57M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while FLWS trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs LE Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 276.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while LE trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 44.70. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs FTCH Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.21M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BARK Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 225.64M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BARK trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BARK-WT Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 222.38M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BARK-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs QRTEA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.51M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs LOGC Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 212.90M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while LOGC trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs JMIA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 186.76M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while JMIA trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BZUN Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 182.89M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BZUN trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs VLTA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 149.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs AKA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 149.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while AKA trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs WBUY Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 133.77M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while WBUY trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs DADA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 132.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while DADA trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs QRTEP Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130.03M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs GOED Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs NEGG Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 120.26M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while NEGG trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs OCG Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 102.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while OCG trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -30.61. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs APRN Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 99.98M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to APRN's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs DIBS Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 87.78M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while DIBS trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs QVCGB Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 84.56M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while QVCGB trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs SPWH Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 77.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while SPWH trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs GRWG Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 67.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while GRWG trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs NHTC Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 51.46M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while NHTC trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 111.75. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs QRTEB Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs PRTS Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 50.75M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while PRTS trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs CTIB Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs HOUR Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 44.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while HOUR trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 127.50. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BBBY Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 41.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs QVCGA Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 40.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while QVCGA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs SSU Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BGFV Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 27.65M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BGFV trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs KIRK Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while KIRK trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs TLF Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 24.99M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while TLF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs YSG Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 22.69M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while YSG trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs CGTL Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 22.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while CGTL trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs JBDI Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 21.77M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while JBDI trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs ZOOZ Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 15.86M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while ZOOZ trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs IPW Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 15.62M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while IPW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs BOXD Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14.01M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs ZKH Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.67M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while ZKH trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.
AAP vs FTEL Comparison
AAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAP stands at 2.04B. In comparison, FTEL has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AAP is priced at $34.16, while FTEL trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas FTEL's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, AAP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FTEL's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAP is less volatile compared to FTEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAP.