Wireless Telecom Group, Inc.
Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. WTT Peers
See (WTT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTT | $2.13 | -0.23% | 45.3M | -19.32 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| CSCO | $66.06 | +2.23% | 261.6B | 26.96 | $2.45 | +2.44% |
| MSI | $417.83 | +0.41% | 69.7B | 34.85 | $11.99 | +0.99% |
| NOK | $5.41 | +0.28% | 29.1B | 21.62 | $0.25 | +2.66% |
| ERIC | $8.53 | +0.24% | 28.6B | 170.60 | $0.05 | +2.92% |
| UI | $407.90 | +1.36% | 24.7B | 44.97 | $9.07 | +0.59% |
| HPE | $18.10 | +1.91% | 23.8B | 17.40 | $1.04 | +2.88% |
| ZBRA | $295.36 | +1.41% | 15B | 27.94 | $10.57 | N/A |
| CRDO | $72.96 | -0.05% | 12.4B | 235.35 | $0.31 | N/A |
| JNPR | $35.90 | +0.25% | 12B | 34.19 | $1.05 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
WTT vs CSCO Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 261.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CSCO trades at $66.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs MSI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while MSI trades at $417.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs NOK Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while NOK trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ERIC Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ERIC trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 170.60. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs UI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while UI trades at $407.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs HPE Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while HPE trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ZBRA Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ZBRA trades at $295.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs CRDO Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CRDO trades at $72.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 235.35. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs JNPR Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while JNPR trades at $35.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs CIEN Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CIEN trades at $72.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 99.60. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ASTS Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ASTS trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -15.75. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs LITE Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while LITE trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LITE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SATS Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SATS trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -23.31. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs BDC Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while BDC trades at $110.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs MAXR Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs PI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while PI trades at $113.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -1890.83. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs EXTR Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while EXTR trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -40.56. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs VIAV Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while VIAV trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 472.00. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs INFN Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs KN Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while KN trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 63.70. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs COMM Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while COMM trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs DGII Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while DGII trades at $34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SWIR Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs VSAT Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while VSAT trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs HLIT Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while HLIT trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs NTGR Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 869.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while NTGR trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs POLY Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ITRN Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 748.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ITRN trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ADTN Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 642.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ADTN trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs AIOT Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 622.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while AIOT trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs CLFD Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 539.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CLFD trades at $39.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is -278.79. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs PWFL Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs GILT Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 341M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while GILT trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ITI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs AUDC Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while AUDC trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs AVNW Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while AVNW trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -116.11. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SATX Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 250.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SATX trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs TSAT Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 235.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while TSAT trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ONDS Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 233.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ONDS trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs CRNT Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 216.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CRNT trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs FEIM Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while FEIM trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs BKTI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while BKTI trades at $45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs PCTI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs INSG Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while INSG trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs KVHI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while KVHI trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs LTRX Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while LTRX trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs TESS Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SILC Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SILC trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs JCS Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs CMTL Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CMTL trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs AMPGW Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while AMPGW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs FKWL Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while FKWL trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -30.07. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs AMPG Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while AMPG trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs AIRG Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while AIRG trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs BOSC Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while BOSC trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs UTSI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while UTSI trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs OCC Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while OCC trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SYTA Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SYTA trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs MOB Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while MOB trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SYTAW Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SYTAW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs MINM Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while MINM trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SYNX Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SYNX trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SONM Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SONM trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SONM's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs IOTR Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while IOTR trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -41.10. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs CLRO Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CLRO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs CMBM Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CMBM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ASNS Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ASNS trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs VISL Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while VISL trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs AKTS Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while AKTS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +23.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs MITQ Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while MITQ trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs BOXL Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while BOXL trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs CASA Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs MOBBW Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while MOBBW trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs MYNA Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs DZSI Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs EXFO Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs BDR Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs VCRA Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ORBC Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs ZXZZT Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while ZXZZT trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.
WTT vs SATX-WTA Comparison
WTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTT stands at 45.3M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTT is priced at $2.13, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTT currently has a P/E ratio of -19.32, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WTT is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTT.