AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTS | $80.64 | -5.27% | 32.8B | -45.30 | -$1.78 | N/A |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 6.29 | $4.06 | N/A |
| TMUS | $181.79 | +2.41% | 196.7B | 18.96 | $9.59 | +2.17% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| VZ | $42.07 | -1.15% | 175.7B | 8.77 | $4.80 | +6.59% |
| SPCK | $22.13 | -0.02% | 165.7B | -17.43 | -$1.27 | +16.28% |
| TBB | $20.80 | +0.92% | 144.3B | 7.00 | $2.97 | +5.38% |
| T-PA | $19.11 | +0.56% | 144B | 6.38 | $3.00 | +5.38% |
| T-PC | $18.00 | +0.56% | 143.7B | 5.99 | $3.00 | +5.38% |
| T | $20.58 | +0.00% | 143.2B | 9.50 | $2.17 | +5.38% |
Stock Comparison
ASTS vs VZA Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check VZA's competition here
ASTS vs TMUS Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 196.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TMUS trades at $181.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TMUS's competition here
ASTS vs TBC Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TBC's competition here
ASTS vs VZ Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 175.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while VZ trades at $42.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check VZ's competition here
ASTS vs SPCK Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, SPCK has a market cap of 165.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while SPCK trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas SPCK's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SPCK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to SPCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check SPCK's competition here
ASTS vs TBB Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TBB trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TBB's competition here
ASTS vs T-PA Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 144B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while T-PA trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check T-PA's competition here
ASTS vs T-PC Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while T-PC trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check T-PC's competition here
ASTS vs T Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 143.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while T trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas T's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check T's competition here
ASTS vs CMCSV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CMCSV has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CMCSV trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CMCSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMCSV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CMCSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CMCSV's competition here
ASTS vs CMCSA Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CMCSA trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CMCSA's competition here
ASTS vs AMX Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while AMX trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check AMX's competition here
ASTS vs AMOV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check AMOV's competition here
ASTS vs CHT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CHT trades at $44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CHT's competition here
ASTS vs VOD Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while VOD trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -15.49. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check VOD's competition here
ASTS vs ORAN Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check ORAN's competition here
ASTS vs SATS Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while SATS trades at $98.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -55.54. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SATS's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check SATS's competition here
ASTS vs VIV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while VIV trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check VIV's competition here
ASTS vs TEF Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TEF trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TEF's competition here
ASTS vs BCE Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while BCE trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check BCE's competition here
ASTS vs CHTR Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CHTR trades at $135.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CHTR's competition here
ASTS vs RCI Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while RCI trades at $31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check RCI's competition here
ASTS vs TU Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TU trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TU's competition here
ASTS vs TIGO Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TIGO trades at $94.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TIGO's competition here
ASTS vs ECHO Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while ECHO trades at $98.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is -192.73. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check ECHO's competition here
ASTS vs SJR Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check SJR's competition here
ASTS vs TLK Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TLK trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TLK's competition here
ASTS vs LBDAV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBDAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBDAV trades at $91.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LBDAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBDAV's competition here
ASTS vs LBDKV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBDKV's competition here
ASTS vs SKM Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while SKM trades at $31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 214.63. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check SKM's competition here
ASTS vs TIMB Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TIMB trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TIMB's competition here
ASTS vs GSAT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while GSAT trades at $80.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -729.09. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check GSAT's competition here
ASTS vs FYBR Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while FYBR trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check FYBR's competition here
ASTS vs MBT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check MBT's competition here
ASTS vs CTDD Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CTDD trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CTDD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CTDD's competition here
ASTS vs KT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while KT trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check KT's competition here
ASTS vs LUMN Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LUMN trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LUMN's competition here
ASTS vs USM Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while USM trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to USM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check USM's competition here
ASTS vs TEO Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TEO trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TEO's competition here
ASTS vs IRDM Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while IRDM trades at $52.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 53.12. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check IRDM's competition here
ASTS vs TKC Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TKC trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TKC's competition here
ASTS vs LBRDK Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBRDK trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBRDK's competition here
ASTS vs LBRDA Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBRDA trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBRDA's competition here
ASTS vs LBYKV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBYKV's competition here
ASTS vs TDS-PV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TDS-PV trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TDS-PV's competition here
ASTS vs TDS-PU Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TDS-PU trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TDS-PU's competition here
ASTS vs SNRE Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while SNRE trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -54.59. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check SNRE's competition here
ASTS vs CTBB Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CTBB trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CTBB's competition here
ASTS vs PHI Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while PHI trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check PHI's competition here
ASTS vs TDS Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TDS trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TDS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TDS's competition here
ASTS vs KYIV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while KYIV trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check KYIV's competition here
ASTS vs VEON Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while VEON trades at $53.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check VEON's competition here
ASTS vs LBTYK Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBTYK trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBTYK's competition here
ASTS vs LBTYA Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBTYA trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBTYA's competition here
ASTS vs SNREV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, SNREV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while SNREV trades at $50.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas SNREV's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SNREV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to SNREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check SNREV's competition here
ASTS vs LBTYB Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBTYB trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBTYB's competition here
ASTS vs LILAP Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LILAP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LILAP trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LILAP's P/E ratio is -261.04. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LILAP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LILAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LILAP's competition here
ASTS vs UZF Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while UZF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check UZF's competition here
ASTS vs LBRDP Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LBRDP trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LBRDP's competition here
ASTS vs UZE Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while UZE trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check UZE's competition here
ASTS vs UZD Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while UZD trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check UZD's competition here
ASTS vs DISH Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DISH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check DISH's competition here
ASTS vs AD Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while AD trades at $34.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to AD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check AD's competition here
ASTS vs IHS Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while IHS trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IHS's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check IHS's competition here
ASTS vs UNIT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while UNIT trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check UNIT's competition here
ASTS vs LILKV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LILKV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LILKV trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LILKV's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LILKV's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LILKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LILKV's competition here
ASTS vs LILA Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LILA trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LILA's competition here
ASTS vs LILAK Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LILAK trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LILAK's competition here
ASTS vs ATEX Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while ATEX trades at $106.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -76.84. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check ATEX's competition here
ASTS vs ASTSW Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check ASTSW's competition here
ASTS vs IDT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while IDT trades at $60.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check IDT's competition here
ASTS vs RADI Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check RADI's competition here
ASTS vs TV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TV trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TV's competition here
ASTS vs SIFY Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while SIFY trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check SIFY's competition here
ASTS vs LILAV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, LILAV has a market cap of 863.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while LILAV trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas LILAV's P/E ratio is -47.41. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LILAV's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to LILAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check LILAV's competition here
ASTS vs ATUS Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while ATUS trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check ATUS's competition here
ASTS vs GLIBA Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 760.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while GLIBA trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check GLIBA's competition here
ASTS vs GLIBK Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while GLIBK trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check GLIBK's competition here
ASTS vs SHEN Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 725.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while SHEN trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check SHEN's competition here
ASTS vs TSAT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 685.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while TSAT trades at $46.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check TSAT's competition here
ASTS vs CCOI Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 610.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CCOI trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CCOI's ROE of +4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CCOI's competition here
ASTS vs OPTU Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 580.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while OPTU trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is less volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check OPTU's competition here
ASTS vs CNSL Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CNSL's competition here
ASTS vs OOMA Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 543.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while OOMA trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OOMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check OOMA's competition here
ASTS vs GOGO Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while GOGO trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check GOGO's competition here
ASTS vs WOW Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while WOW trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check WOW's competition here
ASTS vs RBBN Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while RBBN trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RBBN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check RBBN's competition here
ASTS vs ATNI Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while ATNI trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -117.76. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check ATNI's competition here
ASTS vs HCHC Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check HCHC's competition here
ASTS vs CABO Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 266.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CABO trades at $46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CABO's competition here
ASTS vs CXDO Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while CXDO trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check CXDO's competition here
ASTS vs RDCM Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 237M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while RDCM trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check RDCM's competition here
ASTS vs KVHI Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 177.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while KVHI trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -35.04. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check KVHI's competition here
ASTS vs GLBKV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check GLBKV's competition here
ASTS vs GLBAV Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check GLBAV's competition here
ASTS vs MTSL Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check MTSL's competition here
ASTS vs KYIVW Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, KYIVW has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while KYIVW trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas KYIVW's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KYIVW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to KYIVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check KYIVW's competition here
ASTS vs KORE-WT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, KORE-WT has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while KORE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas KORE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KORE-WT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is more volatile compared to KORE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check KORE-WT's competition here
ASTS vs ELWT Comparison July 2026
ASTS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASTS stands at 32.8B. In comparison, ELWT has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASTS is priced at $80.64, while ELWT trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASTS currently has a P/E ratio of -45.30, whereas ELWT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, ASTS's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ELWT's ROE of +7.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ASTS is less volatile compared to ELWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASTS.Check ELWT's competition here