Williams Industrial Services Group Inc. (WLMS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WLMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLMS | $0.36 | -3.17% | 9.7M | -0.76 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| PWR | $668.31 | -3.34% | 100.3B | 57.37 | $11.65 | +0.06% |
| FIX | $1,741.30 | -6.64% | 61.3B | 50.24 | $34.66 | +0.15% |
| FER | $67.72 | +0.68% | 48.8B | 21.01 | $3.22 | +1.91% |
| EME | $774.66 | -3.69% | 34.5B | 28.36 | $27.32 | +0.17% |
| MTZ | $373.43 | -4.40% | 29.5B | 50.26 | $7.43 | N/A |
| STRL | $700.75 | -9.76% | 21.5B | 54.58 | $12.84 | N/A |
| APG | $41.98 | +0.48% | 18.2B | 26.91 | $1.56 | N/A |
| J | $127.89 | +2.62% | 15.1B | 19.23 | $6.65 | +1.06% |
| DY | $437.76 | -6.96% | 13.1B | 32.64 | $13.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLMS vs PWR Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while PWR trades at $668.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 57.37. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check PWR's competition here
WLMS vs FIX Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while FIX trades at $1,741.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 50.24. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check FIX's competition here
WLMS vs FER Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while FER trades at $67.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check FER's competition here
WLMS vs EME Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while EME trades at $774.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check EME's competition here
WLMS vs MTZ Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while MTZ trades at $373.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 50.26. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check MTZ's competition here
WLMS vs STRL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while STRL trades at $700.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check STRL's competition here
WLMS vs APG Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while APG trades at $41.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check APG's competition here
WLMS vs J Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while J trades at $127.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas J's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check J's competition here
WLMS vs DY Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while DY trades at $437.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check DY's competition here
WLMS vs IESC Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while IESC trades at $654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check IESC's competition here
WLMS vs BLD Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while BLD trades at $354.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check BLD's competition here
WLMS vs AGX Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while AGX trades at $706.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 62.05. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check AGX's competition here
WLMS vs LGN Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while LGN trades at $75.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is 361.10. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check LGN's competition here
WLMS vs ACM Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while ACM trades at $67.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check ACM's competition here
WLMS vs STN Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while STN trades at $70.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check STN's competition here
WLMS vs TTEK Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while TTEK trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check TTEK's competition here
WLMS vs ECG Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while ECG trades at $138.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check ECG's competition here
WLMS vs FLR Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while FLR trades at $49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check FLR's competition here
WLMS vs MYRG Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while MYRG trades at $433.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 47.74. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check MYRG's competition here
WLMS vs GVA Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while GVA trades at $145.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check GVA's competition here
WLMS vs ROAD Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while ROAD trades at $107.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check ROAD's competition here
WLMS vs PRIM Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while PRIM trades at $88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check PRIM's competition here
WLMS vs KBR Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while KBR trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check KBR's competition here
WLMS vs TPC Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while TPC trades at $76.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check TPC's competition here
WLMS vs NEXT Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while NEXT trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check NEXT's competition here
WLMS vs NVEE Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while NVEE trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check NVEE's competition here
WLMS vs AMRC Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while AMRC trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 37.35. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check AMRC's competition here
WLMS vs JUNE Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while JUNE trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check JUNE's competition here
WLMS vs WLDN Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while WLDN trades at $76.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check WLDN's competition here
WLMS vs CDNL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, CDNL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while CDNL trades at $74.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas CDNL's P/E ratio is 103.13. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CDNL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to CDNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check CDNL's competition here
WLMS vs GLDD Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while GLDD trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check GLDD's competition here
WLMS vs ORN Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 599.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while ORN trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 51.07. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check ORN's competition here
WLMS vs BBCP Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while BBCP trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 79.36. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check BBCP's competition here
WLMS vs BWMN Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 502.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while BWMN trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check BWMN's competition here
WLMS vs MTRX Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while MTRX trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -69.61. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check MTRX's competition here
WLMS vs ESOA Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 333.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while ESOA trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check ESOA's competition here
WLMS vs WXM Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 265.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while WXM trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WXM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check WXM's competition here
WLMS vs MAGH Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while MAGH trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check MAGH's competition here
WLMS vs VATE Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while VATE trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check VATE's competition here
WLMS vs AENZ Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check AENZ's competition here
WLMS vs SHIM Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while SHIM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check SHIM's competition here
WLMS vs JLHL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, JLHL has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while JLHL trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas JLHL's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to JLHL's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to JLHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check JLHL's competition here
WLMS vs CSLRW Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check CSLRW's competition here
WLMS vs OEG Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check OEG's competition here
WLMS vs AGFY Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while AGFY trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check AGFY's competition here
WLMS vs SKBL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while SKBL trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check SKBL's competition here
WLMS vs KAZR Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, KAZR has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while KAZR trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas KAZR's P/E ratio is 137.00. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KAZR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to KAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check KAZR's competition here
WLMS vs BLNK Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while BLNK trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check BLNK's competition here
WLMS vs SLND Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while SLND trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SLND's ROE of +15.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check SLND's competition here
WLMS vs DRTT Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check DRTT's competition here
WLMS vs RITR Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while RITR trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check RITR's competition here
WLMS vs PGHL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check PGHL's competition here
WLMS vs MSW Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while MSW trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check MSW's competition here
WLMS vs ONEG Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while ONEG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check ONEG's competition here
WLMS vs SKK Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while SKK trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check SKK's competition here
WLMS vs SUNE Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while SUNE trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check SUNE's competition here
WLMS vs MSGY Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while MSGY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check MSGY's competition here
WLMS vs FBGL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while FBGL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check FBGL's competition here
WLMS vs MIMI Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while MIMI trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check MIMI's competition here
WLMS vs ENG Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check ENG's competition here
WLMS vs OFAL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while OFAL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OFAL's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check OFAL's competition here
WLMS vs BNC Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while BNC trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check BNC's competition here
WLMS vs MGN Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while MGN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check MGN's competition here
WLMS vs OIG Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check OIG's competition here
WLMS vs FGL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while FGL trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check FGL's competition here
WLMS vs WLGS Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while WLGS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check WLGS's competition here
WLMS vs IEA Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check IEA's competition here
WLMS vs IEAWW Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check IEAWW's competition here
WLMS vs CBI Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while CBI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check CBI's competition here
WLMS vs HIL Comparison July 2026
WLMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLMS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLMS is priced at $0.36, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.76, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLMS's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLMS is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLMS.Check HIL's competition here