Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CDNL's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CDNL and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNL | $35.54 | -2.44% | 584.5M | 53.08 | $0.72 | N/A |
| PWR | $627.88 | +0.55% | 96.1B | 54.86 | $11.65 | +0.07% |
| FIX | $1,612.85 | +0.16% | 58.1B | 40.57 | $40.66 | +0.18% |
| FER | $56.48 | -2.71% | 42.1B | 17.99 | $3.22 | +2.23% |
| EME | $757.11 | +0.39% | 34.1B | 26.07 | $29.66 | +0.19% |
| MTZ | $240.77 | +1.51% | 19.8B | 33.14 | $7.43 | N/A |
| APG | $36.03 | -10.01% | 17.4B | 25.78 | $1.56 | N/A |
| J | $142.38 | -2.63% | 17B | 21.00 | $6.87 | +0.97% |
| STRL | $496.67 | +2.09% | 15.4B | 31.49 | $15.95 | N/A |
| IESC | $324.67 | +0.65% | 13.7B | 21.99 | $15.59 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE: PWR)
CDNL vs PWR Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while PWR trades at $627.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to PWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check PWR's competition here
Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (NYSE: FIX)
CDNL vs FIX Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while FIX trades at $1,612.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to FIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check FIX's competition here
Ferrovial SE (NASDAQ: FER)
CDNL vs FER Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while FER trades at $56.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check FER's competition here
EMCOR Group, Inc. (NYSE: EME)
CDNL vs EME Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while EME trades at $757.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check EME's competition here
MasTec, Inc. (NYSE: MTZ)
CDNL vs MTZ Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while MTZ trades at $240.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check MTZ's competition here
APi Group Corporation (NYSE: APG)
CDNL vs APG Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while APG trades at $36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to APG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check APG's competition here
Jacobs Solutions Inc. (NYSE: J)
CDNL vs J Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, J has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while J trades at $142.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas J's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to J. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check J's competition here
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRL)
CDNL vs STRL Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while STRL trades at $496.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to STRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check STRL's competition here
IES Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: IESC)
CDNL vs IESC Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while IESC trades at $324.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to IESC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check IESC's competition here
TopBuild Corp. (NYSE: BLD)
CDNL vs BLD Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while BLD trades at $354.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check BLD's competition here
Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK)
CDNL vs TTEK Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while TTEK trades at $35.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check TTEK's competition here
Dycom Industries, Inc. (NYSE: DY)
CDNL vs DY Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while DY trades at $293.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check DY's competition here
Aecom (NYSE: ACM)
CDNL vs ACM Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while ACM trades at $64.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check ACM's competition here
Stantec Inc. (NYSE: STN)
CDNL vs STN Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while STN trades at $70.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check STN's competition here
Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR)
CDNL vs FLR Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while FLR trades at $55.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check FLR's competition here
Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (NASDAQ: LGN)
CDNL vs LGN Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while LGN trades at $55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is 271.62. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to LGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check LGN's competition here
Argan, Inc. (NYSE: AGX)
CDNL vs AGX Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while AGX trades at $401.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check AGX's competition here
Everus Construction Group, Inc. (NYSE: ECG)
CDNL vs ECG Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while ECG trades at $116.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to ECG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check ECG's competition here
Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD)
CDNL vs ROAD Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while ROAD trades at $97.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check ROAD's competition here
Granite Construction Incorporated (NYSE: GVA)
CDNL vs GVA Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while GVA trades at $116.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GVA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check GVA's competition here
Tutor Perini Corporation (NYSE: TPC)
CDNL vs TPC Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while TPC trades at $88.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to TPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check TPC's competition here
KBR, Inc. (NYSE: KBR)
CDNL vs KBR Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while KBR trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check KBR's competition here
MYR Group Inc. (NASDAQ: MYRG)
CDNL vs MYRG Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while MYRG trades at $286.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check MYRG's competition here
Primoris Services Corporation (NYSE: PRIM)
CDNL vs PRIM Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while PRIM trades at $74.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check PRIM's competition here
Exponent, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPO)
CDNL vs EXPO Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while EXPO trades at $67.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check EXPO's competition here
Cadeler A/S (NYSE: CDLR)
CDNL vs CDLR Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while CDLR trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check CDLR's competition here
ITG Inc. (NASDAQ: ITG)
CDNL vs ITG Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, ITG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while ITG trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas ITG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to ITG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check ITG's competition here
NV5 Global, Inc. (NASDAQ: NVEE)
CDNL vs NVEE Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while NVEE trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check NVEE's competition here
Willdan Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: WLDN)
CDNL vs WLDN Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while WLDN trades at $81.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check WLDN's competition here
Ameresco, Inc. (NYSE: AMRC)
CDNL vs AMRC Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while AMRC trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check AMRC's competition here
Junee Limited (NASDAQ: JUNE)
CDNL vs JUNE Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while JUNE trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check JUNE's competition here
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (NASDAQ: GLDD)
CDNL vs GLDD Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while GLDD trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check GLDD's competition here
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWMN)
CDNL vs BWMN Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 745.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while BWMN trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check BWMN's competition here
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBCP)
CDNL vs BBCP Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 523.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while BBCP trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 64.88. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check BBCP's competition here
Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: PHOE)
CDNL vs PHOE Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 424.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while PHOE trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 655.67. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PHOE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check PHOE's competition here
Orion Group Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ORN)
CDNL vs ORN Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while ORN trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to ORN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check ORN's competition here
Matrix Service Company (NASDAQ: MTRX)
CDNL vs MTRX Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 304.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while MTRX trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -135.12. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check MTRX's competition here
Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MAGH)
CDNL vs MAGH Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while MAGH trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check MAGH's competition here
Energy Services of America Corporation (NASDAQ: ESOA)
CDNL vs ESOA Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 223.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while ESOA trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check ESOA's competition here
Aenza S.A.A. (NYSE: AENZ)
CDNL vs AENZ Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check AENZ's competition here
Shimmick Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIM)
CDNL vs SHIM Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while SHIM trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check SHIM's competition here
Complete Solaria, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSLRW)
CDNL vs CSLRW Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check CSLRW's competition here
Orbital Energy Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: OEG)
CDNL vs OEG Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check OEG's competition here
INNOVATE Corp. (NYSE: VATE)
CDNL vs VATE Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 96.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while VATE trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to VATE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check VATE's competition here
Agrify Corporation (NASDAQ: AGFY)
CDNL vs AGFY Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while AGFY trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check AGFY's competition here
Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited (NASDAQ: SKBL)
CDNL vs SKBL Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while SKBL trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check SKBL's competition here
Blink Charging Co. (NASDAQ: BLNK)
CDNL vs BLNK Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while BLNK trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check BLNK's competition here
Skyline Builders Group Holding Ltd. Class A (NASDAQ: KAZR)
CDNL vs KAZR Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, KAZR has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while KAZR trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas KAZR's P/E ratio is 108.50. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KAZR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to KAZR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check KAZR's competition here
OPAL Fuels Inc. (NASDAQ: OPAL)
CDNL vs OPAL Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while OPAL trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check OPAL's competition here
DIRTT Environmental Solutions Ltd. (NASDAQ: DRTT)
CDNL vs DRTT Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check DRTT's competition here
Southland Holdings, Inc. (AMEX: SLND)
CDNL vs SLND Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while SLND trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLND's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to SLND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check SLND's competition here
SunScout Holding Limited Class A (AMEX: SNSC)
CDNL vs SNSC Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, SNSC has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while SNSC trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas SNSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNSC's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to SNSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check SNSC's competition here
Primega Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PGHL)
CDNL vs PGHL Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check PGHL's competition here
OneConstruction Group Limited (NASDAQ: ONEG)
CDNL vs ONEG Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while ONEG trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check ONEG's competition here
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: MSW)
CDNL vs MSW Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while MSW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to MSW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check MSW's competition here
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA)
CDNL vs PMA Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, PMA has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while PMA trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas PMA's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to PMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check PMA's competition here
Williams Industrial Services Group Inc. (AMEX: WLMS)
CDNL vs WLMS Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check WLMS's competition here
SUNation Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: SUNE)
CDNL vs SUNE Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while SUNE trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check SUNE's competition here
SKK Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: SKK)
CDNL vs SKK Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while SKK trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -34.38. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to SKK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check SKK's competition here
ENGlobal Corporation (NASDAQ: ENG)
CDNL vs ENG Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check ENG's competition here
Reitar Logtech Holdings Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: RITR)
CDNL vs RITR Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while RITR trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RITR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to RITR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check RITR's competition here
FBS Global Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FBGL)
CDNL vs FBGL Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while FBGL trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check FBGL's competition here
Masonglory Ltd (NASDAQ: MSGY)
CDNL vs MSGY Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while MSGY trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSGY's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check MSGY's competition here
Mint Incorporation Limited (NASDAQ: MIMI)
CDNL vs MIMI Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while MIMI trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check MIMI's competition here
Orbital Infrastructure Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: OIG)
CDNL vs OIG Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check OIG's competition here
BrenX Ltd. (NASDAQ: BRNX)
CDNL vs BRNX Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, BRNX has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while BRNX trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas BRNX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRNX's ROE of -5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to BRNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check BRNX's competition here
Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MGN)
CDNL vs MGN Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while MGN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check MGN's competition here
WANG & LEE GROUP, Inc. (NASDAQ: WLGS)
CDNL vs WLGS Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while WLGS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check WLGS's competition here
OFA Group (NASDAQ: OFAL)
CDNL vs OFAL Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 958.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while OFAL trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OFAL's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check OFAL's competition here
Founder Group Limited (NASDAQ: FGL)
CDNL vs FGL Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 86.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while FGL trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check FGL's competition here
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. N.V. ADR (NYSE: CBI)
CDNL vs CBI Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while CBI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check CBI's competition here
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, Inc. (NASDAQ: IEA)
CDNL vs IEA Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check IEA's competition here
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives Inc (NASDAQ: IEAWW)
CDNL vs IEAWW Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check IEAWW's competition here
Hill International, Inc. (NYSE: HIL)
CDNL vs HIL Comparison September 2026
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNL stands at 584.5M. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDNL is priced at $35.54 on the NASDAQ, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNL currently has a P/E ratio of 53.08, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNL's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNL is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNL.Check HIL's competition here