Ferrovial SE

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while PWR trades at $765.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 105.39. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check PWR's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while FIX trades at $2,016.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check FIX's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while EME trades at $924.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 31.10. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check EME's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while MTZ trades at $420.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 73.51. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check MTZ's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while STRL trades at $851.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 76.01. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check STRL's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while APG trades at $43.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas APG's P/E ratio is -67.45. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check APG's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while IESC trades at $685.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check IESC's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while J trades at $114.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas J's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check J's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while DY trades at $429.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check DY's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while BLD trades at $416.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check BLD's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while LGN trades at $97.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is -171.33. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check LGN's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while AGX trades at $681.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 70.16. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check AGX's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while STN trades at $83.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check STN's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while ACM trades at $69.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check ACM's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while ECG trades at $159.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 36.49. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check ECG's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while TTEK trades at $28.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check TTEK's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while ROAD trades at $126.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 55.40. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check ROAD's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while MYRG trades at $455.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 50.14. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check MYRG's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while FLR trades at $44.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is -144.45. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check FLR's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while PRIM trades at $113.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check PRIM's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while GVA trades at $140.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check GVA's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while TPC trades at $82.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 56.66. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check TPC's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while KBR trades at $32.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check KBR's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while AMRC trades at $29.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 50.45. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check AMRC's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while NVEE trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check NVEE's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while WLDN trades at $92.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check WLDN's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while JUNE trades at $59.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check JUNE's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while GLDD trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check GLDD's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 862.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while LMB trades at $72.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check LMB's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 599.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while ORN trades at $14.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 67.27. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check ORN's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 584.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while BWMN trades at $33.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 53.81. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check BWMN's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 367.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while BBCP trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 80.89. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check BBCP's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, JLHL has a market cap of 367M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while JLHL trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas JLHL's P/E ratio is 94.74. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to JLHL's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to JLHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check JLHL's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 351.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while ESOA trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 146.77. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check ESOA's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 342.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while MTRX trades at $12.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check MTRX's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while MAGH trades at $6.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check MAGH's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while AENZ trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check AENZ's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while SHIM trades at $4.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check SHIM's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while VATE trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check VATE's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check CSLRW's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while OEG trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check OEG's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while BLNK trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check BLNK's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while SKBL trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 175.00. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check SKBL's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while AGFY trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check AGFY's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while SLND trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLND's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check SLND's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while DRTT trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check DRTT's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while RITR trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check RITR's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while PGHL trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check PGHL's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while MSW trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check MSW's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while ONEG trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check ONEG's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while OFAL trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OFAL's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check OFAL's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while WLMS trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check WLMS's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while FBGL trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check FBGL's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while SKK trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -28.94. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check SKK's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while MIMI trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check MIMI's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while ENG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check ENG's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while SUNE trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check SUNE's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while WXM trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WXM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check WXM's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while BNC trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check BNC's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while MGN trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check MGN's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while OIG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check OIG's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while WLGS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check WLGS's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 355.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while FGL trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check FGL's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while HIL trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check HIL's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check IEAWW's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while IEA trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check IEA's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while SCCI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FER has daily volatility of 1.44 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here

FER plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FER stands at 49.7B. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FER is priced at $68.91, while CBI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FER currently has a P/E ratio of 48.53, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FER's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FER is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FER.Check CBI's competition here