Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See PMA's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for PMA and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMA | $1.25 | -1.57% | 16.2M | -1.51 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| PWR | $625.84 | -4.28% | 93.9B | 53.73 | $11.65 | +0.07% |
| FIX | $1,733.60 | -5.33% | 61B | 49.96 | $34.66 | +0.15% |
| FER | $63.25 | -0.08% | 45.6B | 19.62 | $3.22 | +2.04% |
| EME | $744.85 | -3.15% | 33.1B | 27.24 | $27.32 | +0.19% |
| MTZ | $337.84 | -5.86% | 26.7B | 45.45 | $7.43 | N/A |
| STRL | $660.94 | -7.86% | 20.3B | 51.47 | $12.84 | N/A |
| APG | $39.57 | +0.03% | 17.1B | 25.37 | $1.56 | N/A |
| J | $134.56 | +1.94% | 15.9B | 20.23 | $6.65 | +1.01% |
| DY | $429.81 | -2.40% | 12.9B | 32.05 | $13.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE: PWR)
PMA vs PWR Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while PWR trades at $625.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 53.73. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check PWR's competition here
Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (NYSE: FIX)
PMA vs FIX Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while FIX trades at $1,733.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 49.96. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check FIX's competition here
Ferrovial SE (NASDAQ: FER)
PMA vs FER Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while FER trades at $63.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check FER's competition here
EMCOR Group, Inc. (NYSE: EME)
PMA vs EME Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while EME trades at $744.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check EME's competition here
MasTec, Inc. (NYSE: MTZ)
PMA vs MTZ Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while MTZ trades at $337.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check MTZ's competition here
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRL)
PMA vs STRL Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while STRL trades at $660.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check STRL's competition here
APi Group Corporation (NYSE: APG)
PMA vs APG Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while APG trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check APG's competition here
Jacobs Solutions Inc. (NYSE: J)
PMA vs J Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while J trades at $134.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas J's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to J. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check J's competition here
Dycom Industries, Inc. (NYSE: DY)
PMA vs DY Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while DY trades at $429.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check DY's competition here
IES Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: IESC)
PMA vs IESC Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while IESC trades at $626.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check IESC's competition here
TopBuild Corp. (NYSE: BLD)
PMA vs BLD Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while BLD trades at $354.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check BLD's competition here
Aecom (NYSE: ACM)
PMA vs ACM Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while ACM trades at $70.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check ACM's competition here
Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (NASDAQ: LGN)
PMA vs LGN Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while LGN trades at $70.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is 337.14. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check LGN's competition here
Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK)
PMA vs TTEK Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while TTEK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check TTEK's competition here
Argan, Inc. (NYSE: AGX)
PMA vs AGX Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGX trades at $568.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 49.99. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check AGX's competition here
Stantec Inc. (NYSE: STN)
PMA vs STN Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while STN trades at $67.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check STN's competition here
Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR)
PMA vs FLR Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while FLR trades at $52.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check FLR's competition here
Everus Construction Group, Inc. (NYSE: ECG)
PMA vs ECG Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while ECG trades at $129.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check ECG's competition here
MYR Group Inc. (NASDAQ: MYRG)
PMA vs MYRG Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while MYRG trades at $379.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 41.80. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check MYRG's competition here
Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD)
PMA vs ROAD Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while ROAD trades at $103.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 40.83. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check ROAD's competition here
Granite Construction Incorporated (NYSE: GVA)
PMA vs GVA Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while GVA trades at $124.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check GVA's competition here
Primoris Services Corporation (NYSE: PRIM)
PMA vs PRIM Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while PRIM trades at $86.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check PRIM's competition here
KBR, Inc. (NYSE: KBR)
PMA vs KBR Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while KBR trades at $36.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check KBR's competition here
Tutor Perini Corporation (NYSE: TPC)
PMA vs TPC Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while TPC trades at $86.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check TPC's competition here
Exponent, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPO)
PMA vs EXPO Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while EXPO trades at $61.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check EXPO's competition here
ITG Inc. (NASDAQ: ITG)
PMA vs ITG Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ITG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while ITG trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ITG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to ITG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to ITG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check ITG's competition here
NV5 Global, Inc. (NASDAQ: NVEE)
PMA vs NVEE Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while NVEE trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check NVEE's competition here
Junee Limited (NASDAQ: JUNE)
PMA vs JUNE Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while JUNE trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check JUNE's competition here
Ameresco, Inc. (NYSE: AMRC)
PMA vs AMRC Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while AMRC trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check AMRC's competition here
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (NASDAQ: GLDD)
PMA vs GLDD Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while GLDD trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check GLDD's competition here
Willdan Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: WLDN)
PMA vs WLDN Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while WLDN trades at $72.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check WLDN's competition here
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL)
PMA vs CDNL Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, CDNL has a market cap of 968M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while CDNL trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas CDNL's P/E ratio is 87.92. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to CDNL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to CDNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check CDNL's competition here
Limbach Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LMB)
PMA vs LMB Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 867.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while LMB trades at $72.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check LMB's competition here
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBCP)
PMA vs BBCP Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 530.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while BBCP trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 75.21. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check BBCP's competition here
Orion Group Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ORN)
PMA vs ORN Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 514.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while ORN trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 43.79. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check ORN's competition here
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWMN)
PMA vs BWMN Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while BWMN trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check BWMN's competition here
Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: PHOE)
PMA vs PHOE Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 432M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while PHOE trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 666.67. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check PHOE's competition here
Matrix Service Company (NASDAQ: MTRX)
PMA vs MTRX Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 347.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while MTRX trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -44.07. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check MTRX's competition here
Energy Services of America Corporation (NASDAQ: ESOA)
PMA vs ESOA Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while ESOA trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check ESOA's competition here
Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MAGH)
PMA vs MAGH Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while MAGH trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check MAGH's competition here
Aenza S.A.A. (NYSE: AENZ)
PMA vs AENZ Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check AENZ's competition here
Shimmick Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIM)
PMA vs SHIM Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while SHIM trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check SHIM's competition here
Complete Solaria, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSLRW)
PMA vs CSLRW Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check CSLRW's competition here
CEA Industries Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: BNC)
PMA vs BNC Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while BNC trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check BNC's competition here
INNOVATE Corp. (NYSE: VATE)
PMA vs VATE Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 114.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while VATE trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check VATE's competition here
Orbital Energy Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: OEG)
PMA vs OEG Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check OEG's competition here
Agrify Corporation (NASDAQ: AGFY)
PMA vs AGFY Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGFY trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check AGFY's competition here
Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited (NASDAQ: SKBL)
PMA vs SKBL Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while SKBL trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check SKBL's competition here
Blink Charging Co. (NASDAQ: BLNK)
PMA vs BLNK Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while BLNK trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check BLNK's competition here
Skyline Builders Group Holding Ltd. Class A (NASDAQ: KAZR)
PMA vs KAZR Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, KAZR has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while KAZR trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas KAZR's P/E ratio is 97.50. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to KAZR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to KAZR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check KAZR's competition here
Southland Holdings, Inc. (AMEX: SLND)
PMA vs SLND Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while SLND trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to SLND's ROE of +15.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check SLND's competition here
DIRTT Environmental Solutions Ltd. (NASDAQ: DRTT)
PMA vs DRTT Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check DRTT's competition here
Primega Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PGHL)
PMA vs PGHL Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check PGHL's competition here
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: MSW)
PMA vs MSW Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while MSW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is similarly volatile compared to MSW. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check MSW's competition here
OneConstruction Group Limited (NASDAQ: ONEG)
PMA vs ONEG Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while ONEG trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check ONEG's competition here
Williams Industrial Services Group Inc. (AMEX: WLMS)
PMA vs WLMS Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check WLMS's competition here
SKK Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: SKK)
PMA vs SKK Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while SKK trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check SKK's competition here
SUNation Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: SUNE)
PMA vs SUNE Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while SUNE trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check SUNE's competition here
FBS Global Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FBGL)
PMA vs FBGL Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while FBGL trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check FBGL's competition here
Reitar Logtech Holdings Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: RITR)
PMA vs RITR Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while RITR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check RITR's competition here
ENGlobal Corporation (NASDAQ: ENG)
PMA vs ENG Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check ENG's competition here
Masonglory Ltd (NASDAQ: MSGY)
PMA vs MSGY Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while MSGY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check MSGY's competition here
Mint Incorporation Limited (NASDAQ: MIMI)
PMA vs MIMI Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while MIMI trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check MIMI's competition here
Orbital Infrastructure Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: OIG)
PMA vs OIG Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check OIG's competition here
WANG & LEE GROUP, Inc. (NASDAQ: WLGS)
PMA vs WLGS Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while WLGS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check WLGS's competition here
OFA Group (NASDAQ: OFAL)
PMA vs OFAL Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while OFAL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to OFAL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check OFAL's competition here
Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MGN)
PMA vs MGN Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while MGN trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check MGN's competition here
Founder Group Limited (NASDAQ: FGL)
PMA vs FGL Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while FGL trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check FGL's competition here
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, Inc. (NASDAQ: IEA)
PMA vs IEA Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check IEA's competition here
Hill International, Inc. (NYSE: HIL)
PMA vs HIL Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check HIL's competition here
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives Inc (NASDAQ: IEAWW)
PMA vs IEAWW Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check IEAWW's competition here
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. N.V. ADR (NYSE: CBI)
PMA vs CBI Comparison July 2026
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: PMA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMA stands at 16.2M. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PMA is priced at $1.25 on the NASDAQ, while CBI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PMA's ROE is -5.78%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PMA is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMA.Check CBI's competition here