Quanta Services, Inc.
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | $768.76 | -0.64% | 117.1B | 107.36 | $7.27 | +0.05% |
| FIX | $1,965.15 | -3.41% | 71.9B | 58.93 | $34.68 | +0.11% |
| FER | $67.21 | -1.02% | 49B | 47.93 | $1.42 | +1.48% |
| EME | $909.09 | -1.51% | 41.4B | 31.19 | $29.81 | +0.14% |
| MTZ | $420.38 | -0.81% | 34.4B | 75.87 | $5.73 | N/A |
| STRL | $842.61 | -1.37% | 27.3B | 79.38 | $11.20 | N/A |
| APG | $43.53 | +0.61% | 19.1B | -68.97 | -$0.64 | N/A |
| IESC | $680.28 | +0.37% | 13.9B | 37.24 | $18.72 | N/A |
| DY | $438.12 | -1.50% | 13.6B | 47.25 | $9.56 | N/A |
| J | $113.00 | +5.34% | 13.3B | 33.27 | $3.39 | +1.18% |
Stock Comparison
PWR vs FIX Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while FIX trades at $1,965.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 58.93. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FIX's competition here
PWR vs FER Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while FER trades at $67.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FER's competition here
PWR vs EME Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while EME trades at $909.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check EME's competition here
PWR vs MTZ Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while MTZ trades at $420.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 75.87. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MTZ's competition here
PWR vs STRL Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while STRL trades at $842.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 79.38. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check STRL's competition here
PWR vs APG Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while APG trades at $43.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas APG's P/E ratio is -68.97. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check APG's competition here
PWR vs IESC Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while IESC trades at $680.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IESC's competition here
PWR vs DY Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while DY trades at $438.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 47.25. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check DY's competition here
PWR vs J Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while J trades at $113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas J's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check J's competition here
PWR vs BLD Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while BLD trades at $404.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BLD's competition here
PWR vs AGX Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while AGX trades at $712.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 76.23. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AGX's competition here
PWR vs LGN Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while LGN trades at $83.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is -156.14. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check LGN's competition here
PWR vs ACM Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while ACM trades at $72.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ACM's competition here
PWR vs STN Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while STN trades at $77.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check STN's competition here
PWR vs ECG Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while ECG trades at $155.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ECG's competition here
PWR vs MYRG Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while MYRG trades at $460.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 52.10. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MYRG's competition here
PWR vs ROAD Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while ROAD trades at $119.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 54.28. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ROAD's competition here
PWR vs TTEK Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while TTEK trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check TTEK's competition here
PWR vs FLR Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while FLR trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FLR's competition here
PWR vs PRIM Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while PRIM trades at $112.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check PRIM's competition here
PWR vs GVA Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while GVA trades at $138.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check GVA's competition here
PWR vs TPC Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while TPC trades at $79.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 56.84. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check TPC's competition here
PWR vs KBR Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while KBR trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check KBR's competition here
PWR vs AMRC Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while AMRC trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 57.37. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AMRC's competition here
PWR vs NVEE Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while NVEE trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check NVEE's competition here
PWR vs WLDN Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while WLDN trades at $90.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLDN's competition here
PWR vs JUNE Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while JUNE trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check JUNE's competition here
PWR vs GLDD Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while GLDD trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check GLDD's competition here
PWR vs LMB Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 892.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while LMB trades at $75.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check LMB's competition here
PWR vs ORN Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 626.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while ORN trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 70.36. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ORN's competition here
PWR vs BWMN Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 575.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while BWMN trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 53.03. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BWMN's competition here
PWR vs JLHL Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, JLHL has a market cap of 403.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while JLHL trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas JLHL's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JLHL's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to JLHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check JLHL's competition here
PWR vs BBCP Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while BBCP trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 80.78. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BBCP's competition here
PWR vs MTRX Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 344.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while MTRX trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -23.11. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MTRX's competition here
PWR vs ESOA Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while ESOA trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ESOA's competition here
PWR vs MAGH Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while MAGH trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MAGH's competition here
PWR vs SHIM Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while SHIM trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SHIM's competition here
PWR vs AENZ Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AENZ's competition here
PWR vs VATE Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 161.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while VATE trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check VATE's competition here
PWR vs CSLRW Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check CSLRW's competition here
PWR vs OEG Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OEG's competition here
PWR vs BLNK Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while BLNK trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BLNK's competition here
PWR vs SKBL Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while SKBL trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 179.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SKBL's competition here
PWR vs AGFY Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while AGFY trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AGFY's competition here
PWR vs SLND Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while SLND trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLND's ROE of +15.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SLND's competition here
PWR vs DRTT Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check DRTT's competition here
PWR vs RITR Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while RITR trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check RITR's competition here
PWR vs MSW Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while MSW trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MSW's competition here
PWR vs PGHL Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check PGHL's competition here
PWR vs ONEG Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while ONEG trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ONEG's competition here
PWR vs WLMS Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLMS's competition here
PWR vs OFAL Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while OFAL trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OFAL's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OFAL's competition here
PWR vs MIMI Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while MIMI trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MIMI's competition here
PWR vs FBGL Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while FBGL trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FBGL's competition here
PWR vs SUNE Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while SUNE trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SUNE's competition here
PWR vs SKK Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while SKK trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -21.19. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SKK's competition here
PWR vs ENG Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ENG's competition here
PWR vs WXM Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while WXM trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WXM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WXM's competition here
PWR vs BNC Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while BNC trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BNC's competition here
PWR vs MGN Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while MGN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MGN's competition here
PWR vs OIG Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OIG's competition here
PWR vs WLGS Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while WLGS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLGS's competition here
PWR vs FGL Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 381.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while FGL trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FGL's competition here
PWR vs CBI Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while CBI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check CBI's competition here
PWR vs SCCI Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PWR has daily volatility of 3.98 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here
PWR vs HIL Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check HIL's competition here
PWR vs IEAWW Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IEAWW's competition here
PWR vs IEA Comparison May 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 117.1B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $768.76, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 107.36, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IEA's competition here