Stantec Inc.
Stantec Inc. (STN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (STN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STN | $89.33 | +0.04% | 10.2B | 29.19 | $3.06 | +0.75% |
| PWR | $624.84 | -1.36% | 93.5B | 92.16 | $6.78 | +0.07% |
| FIX | $1,726.12 | -2.69% | 60.7B | 59.67 | $28.91 | +0.13% |
| FER | $69.09 | -1.14% | 49.8B | 48.65 | $1.42 | +1.46% |
| EME | $869.90 | -0.37% | 38.9B | 30.80 | $28.21 | +0.15% |
| MTZ | $376.12 | -1.77% | 29.7B | 74.04 | $5.08 | N/A |
| APG | $48.60 | -0.69% | 21B | -70.45 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| STRL | $497.18 | +0.30% | 15.2B | 53.00 | $9.37 | N/A |
| J | $126.70 | -0.69% | 15B | 33.42 | $3.79 | +1.04% |
| BLD | $453.71 | -2.48% | 12.8B | 24.78 | $18.30 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STN vs PWR Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while PWR trades at $624.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 92.16. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check PWR's competition here
STN vs FIX Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while FIX trades at $1,726.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 59.67. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check FIX's competition here
STN vs FER Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while FER trades at $69.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 48.65. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check FER's competition here
STN vs EME Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while EME trades at $869.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check EME's competition here
STN vs MTZ Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while MTZ trades at $376.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 74.04. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check MTZ's competition here
STN vs APG Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while APG trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas APG's P/E ratio is -70.45. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check APG's competition here
STN vs STRL Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while STRL trades at $497.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check STRL's competition here
STN vs J Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while J trades at $126.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas J's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to J's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check J's competition here
STN vs BLD Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while BLD trades at $453.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check BLD's competition here
STN vs DY Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while DY trades at $410.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check DY's competition here
STN vs IESC Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while IESC trades at $599.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check IESC's competition here
STN vs ACM Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while ACM trades at $80.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check ACM's competition here
STN vs PRIM Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while PRIM trades at $171.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check PRIM's competition here
STN vs AGX Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while AGX trades at $652.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 67.07. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check AGX's competition here
STN vs LGN Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while LGN trades at $80.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is -140.82. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check LGN's competition here
STN vs TTEK Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while TTEK trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check TTEK's competition here
STN vs FLR Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while FLR trades at $48.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is -155.61. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check FLR's competition here
STN vs ECG Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while ECG trades at $136.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check ECG's competition here
STN vs ROAD Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while ROAD trades at $120.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 54.38. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check ROAD's competition here
STN vs GVA Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while GVA trades at $123.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check GVA's competition here
STN vs MYRG Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while MYRG trades at $339.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 45.12. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check MYRG's competition here
STN vs TPC Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while TPC trades at $86.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check TPC's competition here
STN vs KBR Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while KBR trades at $35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check KBR's competition here
STN vs NVEE Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while NVEE trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check NVEE's competition here
STN vs AMRC Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while AMRC trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check AMRC's competition here
STN vs JUNE Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while JUNE trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check JUNE's competition here
STN vs WLDN Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while WLDN trades at $77.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check WLDN's competition here
STN vs GLDD Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while GLDD trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check GLDD's competition here
STN vs LMB Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while LMB trades at $96.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check LMB's competition here
STN vs BWMN Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 545.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while BWMN trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check BWMN's competition here
STN vs ORN Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 493.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while ORN trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 204.67. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check ORN's competition here
STN vs BBCP Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while BBCP trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 86.00. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check BBCP's competition here
STN vs MTRX Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 358.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while MTRX trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check MTRX's competition here
STN vs ESOA Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 288.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while ESOA trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 120.46. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check ESOA's competition here
STN vs MAGH Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while MAGH trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check MAGH's competition here
STN vs SHIM Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while SHIM trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check SHIM's competition here
STN vs JLHL Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, JLHL has a market cap of 198.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while JLHL trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas JLHL's P/E ratio is 51.21. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JLHL's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to JLHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check JLHL's competition here
STN vs AENZ Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check AENZ's competition here
STN vs VATE Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 177.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while VATE trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check VATE's competition here
STN vs CSLRW Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check CSLRW's competition here
STN vs OEG Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check OEG's competition here
STN vs SKBL Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while SKBL trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 180.00. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check SKBL's competition here
STN vs AGFY Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while AGFY trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check AGFY's competition here
STN vs BLNK Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while BLNK trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check BLNK's competition here
STN vs ONEG Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while ONEG trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -291.00. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check ONEG's competition here
STN vs SLND Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while SLND trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLND's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check SLND's competition here
STN vs DRTT Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check DRTT's competition here
STN vs RITR Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while RITR trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check RITR's competition here
STN vs PGHL Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check PGHL's competition here
STN vs MSW Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while MSW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check MSW's competition here
STN vs OFAL Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while OFAL trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OFAL's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check OFAL's competition here
STN vs WLMS Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check WLMS's competition here
STN vs FBGL Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while FBGL trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check FBGL's competition here
STN vs MIMI Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while MIMI trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check MIMI's competition here
STN vs ENG Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check ENG's competition here
STN vs SUNE Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while SUNE trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check SUNE's competition here
STN vs WXM Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while WXM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WXM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check WXM's competition here
STN vs MGN Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while MGN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check MGN's competition here
STN vs SKK Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while SKK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check SKK's competition here
STN vs BNC Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while BNC trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check BNC's competition here
STN vs OIG Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check OIG's competition here
STN vs WLGS Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while WLGS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check WLGS's competition here
STN vs FGL Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 339.5K. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while FGL trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check FGL's competition here
STN vs HIL Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check HIL's competition here
STN vs SCCI Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. STN has daily volatility of 1.15 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here
STN vs IEAWW Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check IEAWW's competition here
STN vs IEA Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check IEA's competition here
STN vs CBI Comparison April 2026
STN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STN stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STN is priced at $89.33, while CBI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, STN is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STN.Check CBI's competition here