Fluor Corporation

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 117.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while PWR trades at $772.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 107.36. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PWR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while FIX trades at $1,972.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 58.93. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FIX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while FER trades at $67.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FER's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while EME trades at $913.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check EME's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while MTZ trades at $421.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 75.87. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MTZ's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while STRL trades at $843.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 79.38. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check STRL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while APG trades at $43.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas APG's P/E ratio is -68.97. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check APG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while IESC trades at $683.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check IESC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while DY trades at $439.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 47.25. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check DY's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while J trades at $112.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas J's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check J's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while BLD trades at $403.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BLD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while AGX trades at $710.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 76.23. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AGX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while LGN trades at $85.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is -156.14. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check LGN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while ACM trades at $72.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ACM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while STN trades at $76.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check STN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while ECG trades at $157.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ECG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while MYRG trades at $463.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 52.10. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MYRG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while ROAD trades at $120.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 54.28. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ROAD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while TTEK trades at $25.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check TTEK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while PRIM trades at $113.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PRIM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while GVA trades at $138.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check GVA's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while TPC trades at $80.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 56.84. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check TPC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while KBR trades at $30.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check KBR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while AMRC trades at $33.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 57.37. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AMRC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while NVEE trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check NVEE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while WLDN trades at $90.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLDN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while JUNE trades at $59.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check JUNE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while GLDD trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check GLDD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 892.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while LMB trades at $73.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check LMB's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 626.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while ORN trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 70.36. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ORN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 575.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while BWMN trades at $31.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 53.03. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BWMN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JLHL has a market cap of 403.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while JLHL trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas JLHL's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JLHL's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to JLHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check JLHL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while BBCP trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 80.78. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BBCP's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 344.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while MTRX trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -23.11. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MTRX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while ESOA trades at $17.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ESOA's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while MAGH trades at $6.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MAGH's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while SHIM trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SHIM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while AENZ trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AENZ's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 161.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while VATE trades at $11.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check VATE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check CSLRW's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while OEG trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check OEG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while BLNK trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BLNK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while SKBL trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 179.00. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SKBL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while AGFY trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AGFY's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while SLND trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLND's ROE of +15.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SLND's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while DRTT trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check DRTT's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while RITR trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check RITR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while MSW trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MSW's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while PGHL trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PGHL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while ONEG trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ONEG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while WLMS trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLMS's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while OFAL trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OFAL's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check OFAL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while MIMI trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MIMI's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while FBGL trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FBGL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while SUNE trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SUNE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while SKK trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -21.19. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SKK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while ENG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ENG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while WXM trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WXM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WXM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while BNC trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BNC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while MGN trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MGN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while OIG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check OIG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while WLGS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLGS's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 381.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while FGL trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FGL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while SCCI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FLR has daily volatility of 2.96 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check IEAWW's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while CBI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check CBI's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while HIL trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check HIL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.4B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $45.16, while IEA trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check IEA's competition here