Wilhelmina International, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for WHLM
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for WHLM
Wilhelmina International, Inc. (WHLM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WHLM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHLM | $3.55 | +0.00% | 17.5M | 35.50 | $0.10 | N/A |
| CTAS | $174.59 | +0.00% | 69.7B | 36.82 | $4.73 | +1.00% |
| TRI | $86.11 | +0.00% | 37.7B | 25.80 | $3.29 | +2.83% |
| CPRT | $33.17 | +0.00% | 31.9B | 20.75 | $1.59 | N/A |
| RBA | $99.81 | +0.00% | 18.6B | 48.98 | $2.04 | +1.22% |
| RTO | $33.70 | +0.00% | 17B | 59.43 | $0.57 | +1.66% |
| ULS | $85.23 | +0.00% | 17B | 54.15 | $1.56 | +0.63% |
| GPN | $65.07 | +0.00% | 15.6B | 14.87 | $4.43 | +1.54% |
| BIPI | $16.49 | -0.01% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +7.76% |
| ARMK | $43.31 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 36.52 | $1.19 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
WHLM vs CTAS Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while CTAS trades at $174.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check CTAS's competition here
WHLM vs TRI Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while TRI trades at $86.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check TRI's competition here
WHLM vs CPRT Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while CPRT trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check CPRT's competition here
WHLM vs RBA Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while RBA trades at $99.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 48.98. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check RBA's competition here
WHLM vs RTO Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while RTO trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 59.43. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check RTO's competition here
WHLM vs ULS Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ULS trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 54.15. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check ULS's competition here
WHLM vs GPN Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while GPN trades at $65.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check GPN's competition here
WHLM vs BIPI Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while BIPI trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check BIPI's competition here
WHLM vs ARMK Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ARMK trades at $43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check ARMK's competition here
WHLM vs IAA Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check IAA's competition here
WHLM vs UNF Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while UNF trades at $258.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check UNF's competition here
WHLM vs MMS Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while MMS trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check MMS's competition here
WHLM vs ABM Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ABM trades at $39.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check ABM's competition here
WHLM vs FA Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while FA trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check FA's competition here
WHLM vs TIC Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while TIC trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check TIC's competition here
WHLM vs CBZ Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while CBZ trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check CBZ's competition here
WHLM vs TH Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while TH trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -40.27. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check TH's competition here
WHLM vs RHLD Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while RHLD trades at $156.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -238.13. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check RHLD's competition here
WHLM vs PRSU Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while PRSU trades at $41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check PRSU's competition here
WHLM vs KODK Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while KODK trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check KODK's competition here
WHLM vs VVI Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check VVI's competition here
WHLM vs BV Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while BV trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 168.57. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check BV's competition here
WHLM vs SP Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check SP's competition here
WHLM vs TDCX Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check TDCX's competition here
WHLM vs LZ Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while LZ trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 70.75. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check LZ's competition here
WHLM vs CASS Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 617.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while CASS trades at $45.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check CASS's competition here
WHLM vs SPIR Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 600.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while SPIR trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check SPIR's competition here
WHLM vs ACTG Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ACTG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check ACTG's competition here
WHLM vs PPHC Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 399.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while PPHC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check PPHC's competition here
WHLM vs QUAD Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 378.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while QUAD trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check QUAD's competition here
WHLM vs CVEO Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 346.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while CVEO trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check CVEO's competition here
WHLM vs SPIR-WT Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
WHLM vs PFMT Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check PFMT's competition here
WHLM vs RHLDV Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check RHLDV's competition here
WHLM vs BUUU Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while BUUU trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 214.43. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check BUUU's competition here
WHLM vs PFSW Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check PFSW's competition here
WHLM vs ARC Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM and ARC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARC's competition here
WHLM vs ANPA Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ANPA trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 886.00. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check ANPA's competition here
WHLM vs DLHC Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while DLHC trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -75.75. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check DLHC's competition here
WHLM vs TISI Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while TISI trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TISI's ROE of -18.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check TISI's competition here
WHLM vs SST-WT Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM and SST-WT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SST-WT's competition here
WHLM vs NTIP Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while NTIP trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check NTIP's competition here
WHLM vs OMEX Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while OMEX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check OMEX's competition here
WHLM vs PMEC Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while PMEC trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check PMEC's competition here
WHLM vs YSXT Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while YSXT trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check YSXT's competition here
WHLM vs SST Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while SST trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check SST's competition here
WHLM vs THH Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while THH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check THH's competition here
WHLM vs SMX Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while SMX trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check SMX's competition here
WHLM vs ZGM Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ZGM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check ZGM's competition here
WHLM vs SGRP Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while SGRP trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check SGRP's competition here
WHLM vs MSGY Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while MSGY trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check MSGY's competition here
WHLM vs ATTO Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check ATTO's competition here
WHLM vs CRE Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while CRE trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check CRE's competition here
WHLM vs LICN Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while LICN trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check LICN's competition here
WHLM vs VSA Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while VSA trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check VSA's competition here
WHLM vs SFHG Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while SFHG trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check SFHG's competition here
WHLM vs PMAX Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 658.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while PMAX trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check PMAX's competition here
WHLM vs THWWW Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check THWWW's competition here
WHLM vs BLMZ Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check BLMZ's competition here
WHLM vs GPAK Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 20.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM and GPAK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPAK's competition here
WHLM vs CRN Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check CRN's competition here
WHLM vs EPIQ Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check EPIQ's competition here
WHLM vs INTX Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM and INTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTX's competition here
WHLM vs PAEWW Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check PAEWW's competition here
WHLM vs ALJJ Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM and ALJJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALJJ's competition here
WHLM vs RRD Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check RRD's competition here
WHLM vs PAE Comparison April 2026
WHLM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHLM stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHLM is priced at $3.55, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHLM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.50, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, WHLM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHLM is less volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHLM.Check PAE's competition here