LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZ | $5.99 | +0.11% | 1B | 100.00 | $0.06 | N/A |
| CTAS | $173.90 | -0.48% | 70.7B | 37.28 | $4.74 | +1.02% |
| RELX | $32.65 | -0.59% | 57.7B | 22.02 | $1.49 | +2.81% |
| TRI | $81.67 | +1.49% | 35.4B | 23.32 | $3.48 | +4.85% |
| CPRT | $30.17 | -0.43% | 28.5B | 19.09 | $1.61 | N/A |
| RBA | $110.64 | +0.21% | 20.7B | 51.58 | $2.15 | +1.12% |
| ULS | $96.49 | -0.52% | 19.2B | 55.44 | $1.72 | +0.58% |
| RTO | $29.66 | -1.76% | 15.3B | 53.18 | $0.57 | +2.04% |
| ARMK | $54.07 | -0.25% | 14.3B | 40.57 | $1.34 | +0.85% |
| BIPI | $16.37 | +0.18% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +7.85% |
Stock Comparison
LZ vs CTAS Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while CTAS trades at $173.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CTAS's competition here
LZ vs RELX Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while RELX trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RELX's competition here
LZ vs TRI Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while TRI trades at $81.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TRI's competition here
LZ vs CPRT Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while CPRT trades at $30.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CPRT's competition here
LZ vs RBA Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while RBA trades at $110.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RBA's competition here
LZ vs ULS Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ULS trades at $96.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ULS's competition here
LZ vs RTO Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while RTO trades at $29.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 53.18. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RTO's competition here
LZ vs ARMK Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ARMK trades at $54.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ARMK's competition here
LZ vs BIPI Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while BIPI trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BIPI's competition here
LZ vs WSE Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while WSE trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to WSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check WSE's competition here
LZ vs IAA Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check IAA's competition here
LZ vs UNF Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while UNF trades at $263.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check UNF's competition here
LZ vs MMS Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while MMS trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check MMS's competition here
LZ vs FA Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while FA trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas FA's P/E ratio is 334.20. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check FA's competition here
LZ vs ABM Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ABM trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ABM's competition here
LZ vs TH Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while TH trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -44.23. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TH's competition here
LZ vs TIC Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while TIC trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TIC's competition here
LZ vs CBZ Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while CBZ trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CBZ's competition here
LZ vs PRSU Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while PRSU trades at $49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PRSU's competition here
LZ vs BV Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while BV trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 425.67. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BV's competition here
LZ vs VVI Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check VVI's competition here
LZ vs SP Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SP's competition here
LZ vs TDCX Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TDCX's competition here
LZ vs RHLD Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while RHLD trades at $128.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +6.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RHLD's competition here
LZ vs CASS Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 619.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while CASS trades at $48.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CASS's competition here
LZ vs SPIR Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while SPIR trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SPIR's competition here
LZ vs ACTG Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 452M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ACTG trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -24.63. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ACTG's competition here
LZ vs QUAD Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 387.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while QUAD trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check QUAD's competition here
LZ vs CVEO Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while CVEO trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -27.60. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CVEO's competition here
LZ vs SPIR-WT Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
LZ vs PPHC Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 291.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while PPHC trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PPHC's competition here
LZ vs PFMT Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PFMT's competition here
LZ vs RHLDV Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RHLDV's competition here
LZ vs BUUU Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while BUUU trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is -1850.00. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BUUU's competition here
LZ vs PFSW Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PFSW's competition here
LZ vs ARC Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ARC's competition here
LZ vs YOOV Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while YOOV trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check YOOV's competition here
LZ vs DLHC Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while DLHC trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -17.09. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check DLHC's competition here
LZ vs TISI Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while TISI trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TISI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TISI's competition here
LZ vs ANPA Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ANPA trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 506.58. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ANPA's competition here
LZ vs SST-WT Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SST-WT's competition here
LZ vs NTIP Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while NTIP trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check NTIP's competition here
LZ vs SST Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while SST trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SST's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SST's competition here
LZ vs OMEX Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while OMEX trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check OMEX's competition here
LZ vs YSXT Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while YSXT trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check YSXT's competition here
LZ vs PMEC Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while PMEC trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PMEC's competition here
LZ vs SGRP Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while SGRP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SGRP's competition here
LZ vs ZGM Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ZGM trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ZGM's competition here
LZ vs THH Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while THH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check THH's competition here
LZ vs MSGY Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while MSGY trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check MSGY's competition here
LZ vs ATTO Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ATTO's competition here
LZ vs CRE Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while CRE trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 0.78. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CRE's competition here
LZ vs VSA Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while VSA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VSA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check VSA's competition here
LZ vs LICN Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while LICN trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check LICN's competition here
LZ vs SFHG Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while SFHG trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SFHG's competition here
LZ vs SMX Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 902.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while SMX trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SMX's competition here
LZ vs PMAX Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 306.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while PMAX trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PMAX's competition here
LZ vs THWWW Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check THWWW's competition here
LZ vs BLMZ Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BLMZ's competition here
LZ vs CRN Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CRN's competition here
LZ vs INTX Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check INTX's competition here
LZ vs EPIQ Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check EPIQ's competition here
LZ vs ALJJ Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ALJJ's competition here
LZ vs RRD Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RRD's competition here
LZ vs PAE Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PAE's competition here
LZ vs PAEWW Comparison June 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.99, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 100.00, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PAEWW's competition here