LegalZoom.com, Inc.
LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZ | $6.36 | -1.40% | 1.1B | 106.00 | $0.06 | N/A |
| CTAS | $172.93 | +0.33% | 69.2B | 36.48 | $4.74 | +1.04% |
| RELX | $33.01 | -0.99% | 58.4B | 21.86 | $1.51 | +2.79% |
| TRI | $85.86 | +0.35% | 37.5B | 24.74 | $3.47 | +4.60% |
| CPRT | $33.79 | -1.77% | 32.6B | 21.25 | $1.59 | N/A |
| ULS | $102.85 | +0.50% | 20.7B | 59.80 | $1.72 | +0.52% |
| RBA | $104.72 | +1.97% | 19.5B | 48.71 | $2.15 | +1.17% |
| RTO | $31.34 | -0.70% | 15.8B | 54.98 | $0.57 | +1.98% |
| ARMK | $51.26 | -0.72% | 13.5B | 38.25 | $1.34 | +0.91% |
| BIPI | $16.34 | +0.40% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +7.84% |
Stock Comparison
LZ vs CTAS Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while CTAS trades at $172.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 36.48. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CTAS's competition here
LZ vs RELX Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while RELX trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RELX's competition here
LZ vs TRI Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while TRI trades at $85.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TRI's competition here
LZ vs CPRT Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while CPRT trades at $33.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CPRT's competition here
LZ vs ULS Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ULS trades at $102.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 59.80. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ULS's competition here
LZ vs RBA Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while RBA trades at $104.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RBA's competition here
LZ vs RTO Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while RTO trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 54.98. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RTO's competition here
LZ vs ARMK Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ARMK trades at $51.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ARMK's competition here
LZ vs BIPI Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while BIPI trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BIPI's competition here
LZ vs IAA Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check IAA's competition here
LZ vs UNF Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while UNF trades at $265.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check UNF's competition here
LZ vs MMS Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while MMS trades at $61.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check MMS's competition here
LZ vs FA Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while FA trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas FA's P/E ratio is 308.40. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check FA's competition here
LZ vs ABM Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ABM trades at $40.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ABM's competition here
LZ vs TIC Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while TIC trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TIC's competition here
LZ vs TH Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while TH trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -41.63. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TH's competition here
LZ vs CBZ Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while CBZ trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CBZ's competition here
LZ vs PRSU Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while PRSU trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 41.04. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ and PRSU have similar daily volatility (2.27).Check PRSU's competition here
LZ vs VVI Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check VVI's competition here
LZ vs BV Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while BV trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 419.67. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BV's competition here
LZ vs SP Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SP's competition here
LZ vs TDCX Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TDCX's competition here
LZ vs RHLD Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 930.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while RHLD trades at $112.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -10.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RHLD's competition here
LZ vs SPIR Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 709.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while SPIR trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SPIR's competition here
LZ vs CASS Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 587.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while CASS trades at $45.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CASS's competition here
LZ vs ACTG Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 450.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ACTG trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ACTG's competition here
LZ vs QUAD Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while QUAD trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check QUAD's competition here
LZ vs CVEO Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 367.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while CVEO trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -27.77. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CVEO's competition here
LZ vs SPIR-WT Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
LZ vs PPHC Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while PPHC trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PPHC's competition here
LZ vs PFMT Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PFMT's competition here
LZ vs RHLDV Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RHLDV's competition here
LZ vs BUUU Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while BUUU trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 226.43. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BUUU's competition here
LZ vs PFSW Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PFSW's competition here
LZ vs YOOV Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while YOOV trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check YOOV's competition here
LZ vs ARC Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ARC's competition here
LZ vs ANPA Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ANPA trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 646.00. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ANPA's competition here
LZ vs DLHC Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while DLHC trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -17.34. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check DLHC's competition here
LZ vs TISI Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while TISI trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TISI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TISI's competition here
LZ vs SST-WT Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SST-WT's competition here
LZ vs ZGM Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ZGM trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ZGM's competition here
LZ vs NTIP Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while NTIP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.64. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check NTIP's competition here
LZ vs OMEX Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while OMEX trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check OMEX's competition here
LZ vs PMEC Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while PMEC trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PMEC's competition here
LZ vs SST Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while SST trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SST's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SST's competition here
LZ vs YSXT Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while YSXT trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check YSXT's competition here
LZ vs THH Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while THH trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check THH's competition here
LZ vs SGRP Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while SGRP trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SGRP's competition here
LZ vs WHLM Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while WHLM trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check WHLM's competition here
LZ vs ATTO Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ATTO's competition here
LZ vs MSGY Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while MSGY trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check MSGY's competition here
LZ vs CRE Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while CRE trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CRE's competition here
LZ vs SFHG Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while SFHG trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SFHG's competition here
LZ vs SMX Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 942K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while SMX trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SMX's competition here
LZ vs VSA Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 809.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while VSA trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VSA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check VSA's competition here
LZ vs LICN Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 640.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while LICN trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check LICN's competition here
LZ vs PMAX Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 439.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while PMAX trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PMAX's competition here
LZ vs THWWW Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check THWWW's competition here
LZ vs BLMZ Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BLMZ's competition here
LZ vs GPAK Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 10.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check GPAK's competition here
LZ vs INTX Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check INTX's competition here
LZ vs PAE Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PAE's competition here
LZ vs ALJJ Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ALJJ's competition here
LZ vs CRN Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CRN's competition here
LZ vs EPIQ Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check EPIQ's competition here
LZ vs PAEWW Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PAEWW's competition here
LZ vs RRD Comparison May 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $6.36, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 106.00, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RRD's competition here