Weatherford International plc
Weatherford International plc WFRD Peers
See (WFRD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFRD | $49.55 | +1.37% | 3.60B | 7.89 | $6.28 | +2.04% |
| SLB | $34.15 | +1.16% | 46.44B | 10.98 | $3.11 | +3.09% |
| BKR | $38.18 | +1.49% | 37.83B | 13.03 | $2.93 | +2.35% |
| TS | $34.79 | +0.17% | 18.65B | 10.61 | $3.28 | +3.86% |
| HAL | $21.30 | +0.24% | 18.31B | 8.91 | $2.39 | +3.21% |
| FTI | $31.27 | +1.69% | 13.11B | 16.54 | $1.89 | +0.65% |
| LB | $79.02 | +8.48% | 6.04B | -33.48 | -$2.36 | +0.27% |
| CHX | $26.26 | +0.77% | 5.03B | 17.39 | $1.51 | +1.46% |
| NOV | $13.06 | +0.89% | 4.91B | 8.76 | $1.49 | +2.32% |
| AROC | $25.46 | +0.53% | 4.50B | 21.39 | $1.19 | +2.82% |
Stock Comparison
WFRD vs SLB Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 46.44B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while SLB trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs BKR Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 37.83B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while BKR trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs TS Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 18.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while TS trades at $34.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs HAL Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 18.31B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while HAL trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs FTI Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 13.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while FTI trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs LB Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while LB trades at $79.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -33.48. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs CHX Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while CHX trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NOV Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.91B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NOV trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs AROC Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while AROC trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs KGS Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while KGS trades at $36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 64.99. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs WHD Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while WHD trades at $44.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs USAC Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while USAC trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs VAL Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while VAL trades at $38.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs TDW-WT Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs VAL-WT Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while VAL-WT trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NEX Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs TDW Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while TDW trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs LBRT Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while LBRT trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs OII Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while OII trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs FLOC Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while FLOC trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs AESI Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while AESI trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs DNOW Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while DNOW trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs SEI Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while SEI trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 45.32. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs SLCA Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs PFHC Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs MRC Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while MRC trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs RES Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while RES trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs INVX Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while INVX trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs HLX Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while HLX trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs XPRO Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 996.98M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while XPRO trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs ACDC Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 911.42M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while ACDC trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs WTTR Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 902.67M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while WTTR trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs EFXT Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 900.04M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while EFXT trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs VTOL Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 868.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while VTOL trades at $30.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NPKI Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 725.63M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NPKI trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NESR Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 639.67M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NESR trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs PUMP Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 631.77M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while PUMP trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NR Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.11M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs CLB Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 585.10M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while CLB trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NESRW Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 580.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NESRW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs DRQ Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.91M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DRQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs SOI Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.11M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NOA Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 487.49M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NOA trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs FTK Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 427.41M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while FTK trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 42.15. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs TTI Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 399.22M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while TTI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs CCLP Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.84M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NGS Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 320.10M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NGS trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs OIS Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 297.28M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while OIS trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 60.06. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs RNGR Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 271.10M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while RNGR trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs FET Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 202.61M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while FET trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs BOOM Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 145.38M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while BOOM trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs PFIE Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.35M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs DTI Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 97.88M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while DTI trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs SND Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 95.22M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while SND trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs LSE Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 91.08M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while LSE trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LSE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NCSM Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 81.65M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NCSM trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs GEOS Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 79.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while GEOS trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs RCON Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 53.18M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while RCON trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs KLXE Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 41.43M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while KLXE trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KLXE's ROE of -11.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs DWSN Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 39.97M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while DWSN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs SDPI Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs NINE Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 30.07M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while NINE trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.
WFRD vs ENSV Comparison
WFRD plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRD stands at 3.60B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 930925.00. Regarding current trading prices, WFRD is priced at $49.55, while ENSV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRD currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WFRD's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRD is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRD.