Woodside Energy Group Ltd
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WDS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDS | $23.28 | +4.28% | 43.5B | 16.18 | $1.42 | +4.88% |
| COP | $124.79 | +4.89% | 149.1B | 20.71 | $5.91 | +2.70% |
| CNQ | $48.84 | +2.66% | 100B | 11.99 | $4.00 | +3.64% |
| EOG | $143.60 | +5.60% | 74.7B | 13.79 | $10.17 | +2.88% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $60.15 | +5.82% | 59.3B | 80.57 | $0.74 | +1.66% |
| FANG | $205.97 | +2.85% | 57.3B | 207.71 | $0.98 | +2.04% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| OXY-WT | $38.03 | +9.28% | 37.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.66% |
| EQT | $57.71 | +2.02% | 35.2B | 10.67 | $5.27 | +1.15% |
Stock Comparison
WDS vs COP Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 149.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while COP trades at $124.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check COP's competition here
WDS vs CNQ Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CNQ trades at $48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CNQ's competition here
WDS vs EOG Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while EOG trades at $143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check EOG's competition here
WDS vs PXD Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check PXD's competition here
WDS vs OXY Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while OXY trades at $60.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 80.57. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check OXY's competition here
WDS vs FANG Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while FANG trades at $205.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 207.71. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check FANG's competition here
WDS vs HES Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check HES's competition here
WDS vs OXY-WT Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while OXY-WT trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check OXY-WT's competition here
WDS vs EQT Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while EQT trades at $57.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check EQT's competition here
WDS vs DVN Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while DVN trades at $50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check DVN's competition here
WDS vs TPL Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while TPL trades at $385.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 52.69. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check TPL's competition here
WDS vs CTRA Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CTRA's competition here
WDS vs EXE Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while EXE trades at $98.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check EXE's competition here
WDS vs COG Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check COG's competition here
WDS vs OVV Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while OVV trades at $60.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check OVV's competition here
WDS vs MRO Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check MRO's competition here
WDS vs PR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while PR trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check PR's competition here
WDS vs APA Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while APA trades at $40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check APA's competition here
WDS vs AR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while AR trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check AR's competition here
WDS vs CHK Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CHK's competition here
WDS vs RRC Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while RRC trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check RRC's competition here
WDS vs CHKEW Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CHKEW's competition here
WDS vs CHKEZ Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CHKEZ's competition here
WDS vs CHRD Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CHRD trades at $151.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -144.07. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CHRD's competition here
WDS vs CHKEL Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CHKEL's competition here
WDS vs SWN Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check SWN's competition here
WDS vs VIST Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while VIST trades at $75.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check VIST's competition here
WDS vs MTDR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while MTDR trades at $61.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check MTDR's competition here
WDS vs CEO Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CEO's competition here
WDS vs MUR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while MUR trades at $40.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 68.88. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check MUR's competition here
WDS vs MGY Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while MGY trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check MGY's competition here
WDS vs CRC Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CRC trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CRC's competition here
WDS vs CPG Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CPG's competition here
WDS vs CNX Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CNX trades at $36.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CNX's competition here
WDS vs OAS Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check OAS's competition here
WDS vs DEN Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check DEN's competition here
WDS vs BCEI Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check BCEI's competition here
WDS vs CRK Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CRK trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CRK's competition here
WDS vs CRGY Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CRGY trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -17.85. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CRGY's competition here
WDS vs CDEV Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CDEV's competition here
WDS vs ERF Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check ERF's competition here
WDS vs BTE Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while BTE trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check BTE's competition here
WDS vs SM Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while SM trades at $33.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check SM's competition here
WDS vs VRN Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check VRN's competition here
WDS vs GPOR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while GPOR trades at $187.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check GPOR's competition here
WDS vs BKV Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while BKV trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check BKV's competition here
WDS vs BSM Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while BSM trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check BSM's competition here
WDS vs ESTE Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check ESTE's competition here
WDS vs CLMT Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CLMT trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CLMT's competition here
WDS vs TALO Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while TALO trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check TALO's competition here
WDS vs NOG Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while NOG trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check NOG's competition here
WDS vs MNR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while MNR trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check MNR's competition here
WDS vs NEXT Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while NEXT trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check NEXT's competition here
WDS vs CPE Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CPE's competition here
WDS vs CIVI Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check CIVI's competition here
WDS vs VET Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while VET trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check VET's competition here
WDS vs STRDW Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check STRDW's competition here
WDS vs KOS Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while KOS trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check KOS's competition here
WDS vs HHRS Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check HHRS's competition here
WDS vs KRP Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while KRP trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check KRP's competition here
WDS vs DMLP Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while DMLP trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check DMLP's competition here
WDS vs FLMN Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check FLMN's competition here
WDS vs DEC Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while DEC trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check DEC's competition here
WDS vs SBR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while SBR trades at $77.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check SBR's competition here
WDS vs TBN Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while TBN trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -19.89. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check TBN's competition here
WDS vs SBOW Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check SBOW's competition here
WDS vs OBE Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 904.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while OBE trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1344.00. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check OBE's competition here
WDS vs HPK Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while HPK trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check HPK's competition here
WDS vs TELL Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check TELL's competition here
WDS vs IMPPP Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 892.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while IMPPP trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -66.01. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check IMPPP's competition here
WDS vs REPX Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 802.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while REPX trades at $37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check REPX's competition here
WDS vs VTS Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 772.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while VTS trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -37.78. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check VTS's competition here
WDS vs GRNT Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 726.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while GRNT trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -22.02. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check GRNT's competition here
WDS vs TXO Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 722M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while TXO trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check TXO's competition here
WDS vs ROCC Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check ROCC's competition here
WDS vs WTI Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 705.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while WTI trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check WTI's competition here
WDS vs VTLE Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check VTLE's competition here
WDS vs EGY Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 621.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while EGY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check EGY's competition here
WDS vs PVAC Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check PVAC's competition here
WDS vs SD Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 563.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while SD trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check SD's competition here
WDS vs GPRK Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while GPRK trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check GPRK's competition here
WDS vs GFR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 446.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while GFR trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -56.09. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check GFR's competition here
WDS vs PNRG Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 433.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while PNRG trades at $269.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check PNRG's competition here
WDS vs GTE Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 324.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while GTE trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check GTE's competition here
WDS vs REI Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 283.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while REI trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check REI's competition here
WDS vs BRY Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check BRY's competition here
WDS vs INR Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while INR trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check INR's competition here
WDS vs KGEI Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 216.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while KGEI trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check KGEI's competition here
WDS vs AMPY Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while AMPY trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check AMPY's competition here
WDS vs SJT Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while SJT trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -414.00. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check SJT's competition here
WDS vs IMPP Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while IMPP trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check IMPP's competition here
WDS vs EPM Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while EPM trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -38.75. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check EPM's competition here
WDS vs PHX Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check PHX's competition here
WDS vs EPSN Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while EPSN trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check EPSN's competition here
WDS vs ANNA Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while ANNA trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 85.75. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check ANNA's competition here
WDS vs RISE Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, RISE has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while RISE trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas RISE's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RISE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is more volatile compared to RISE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check RISE's competition here
WDS vs SAFX Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while SAFX trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check SAFX's competition here
WDS vs EP Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while EP trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check EP's competition here
WDS vs GLND Comparison May 2026
WDS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WDS stands at 43.5B. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WDS is priced at $23.28, while GLND trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDS is less volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDS.Check GLND's competition here