Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 167.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while COP trades at $137.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check COP's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CNQ trades at $50.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CNQ's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while EOG trades at $147.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check EOG's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while OXY-WT trades at $39.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check OXY-WT's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check PXD's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while OXY trades at $61.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check OXY's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while FANG trades at $204.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check FANG's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while DVN trades at $50.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check DVN's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check HES's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while WDS trades at $23.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check WDS's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while EQT trades at $54.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check EQT's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CTRA trades at $32.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CTRA's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while EXE trades at $94.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check EXE's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while PR trades at $23.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check PR's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while OVV trades at $63.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check OVV's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check COG's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check MRO's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while APA trades at $44.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check APA's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while AR trades at $38.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check AR's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CHK's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while RRC trades at $41.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check RRC's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CHKEW's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while SM trades at $38.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to SM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check SM's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CHRD trades at $152.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CHRD's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CHKEZ's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CHKEL's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while VIST trades at $76.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check VIST's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check SWN's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while MTDR trades at $61.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check MTDR's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while LB trades at $86.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 76.73. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check LB's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while MGY trades at $27.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check MGY's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CEO's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while MUR trades at $38.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check MUR's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CNX trades at $35.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CNX's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CPG's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CRC trades at $56.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CRC's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CRGY trades at $14.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CRGY's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check OAS's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check DEN's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check BCEI's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CRK trades at $14.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CRK's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CDEV's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check ERF's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while BTE trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -23.56. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check BTE's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check VRN's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while BSM trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check BSM's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while GPOR trades at $173.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check GPOR's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check ESTE's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while TALO trades at $17.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -136.08. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check TALO's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while NOG trades at $26.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check NOG's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while BKV trades at $24.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check BKV's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CPE's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while CIVI trades at $27.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check CIVI's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while MNR trades at $12.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check MNR's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while NEXT trades at $7.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -8.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check NEXT's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while VET trades at $13.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check VET's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check STRDW's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while KRP trades at $14.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check KRP's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check HHRS's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while KOS trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check KOS's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while DMLP trades at $29.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check DMLP's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while TBN trades at $39.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check TBN's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check FLMN's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while DEC trades at $14.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to DEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check DEC's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while HPK trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -84.70. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check HPK's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 945M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while REPX trades at $43.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check REPX's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check SBOW's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check TELL's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 866.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while OBE trades at $12.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 46.36. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check OBE's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 855.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while TXO trades at $15.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check TXO's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 790.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while VTS trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -5320.11. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is similarly volatile compared to VTS. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check VTS's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 744.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while GPRK trades at $11.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check GPRK's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check ROCC's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while VTLE trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check VTLE's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 672.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while GRNT trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check GRNT's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while EGY trades at $6.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check EGY's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while WTI trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check WTI's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check PVAC's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 540.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while SD trades at $14.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check SD's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 471.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while GFR trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check GFR's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while REI trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to REI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check REI's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 380.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while GTE trades at $10.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check GTE's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 341.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while PNRG trades at $211.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check PNRG's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FTW has a market cap of 326.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while FTW trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas FTW's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FTW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to FTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check FTW's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 280.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while INR trades at $14.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check INR's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while BRY trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check BRY's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while KGEI trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check KGEI's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 203.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while AMPY trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check AMPY's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while PED trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas PED's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check PED's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while EPSN trades at $6.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check EPSN's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check PHX's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while SJT trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -134.50. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check SJT's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while ANNA trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check ANNA's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while EPM trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -33.82. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check EPM's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BSCL has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while BSCL trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas BSCL's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BSCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to BSCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check BSCL's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while EP trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EP's ROE of -4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check EP's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while NRT trades at $9.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is more volatile compared to NRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check NRT's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BSIN has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while BSIN trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas BSIN's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BSIN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to BSIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check BSIN's competition here

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE: TPL) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TPL stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TPL is priced at $369.10 on the NYSE, while HUSA trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TPL currently has a P/E ratio of 47.04, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TPL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TPL is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPL.Check HUSA's competition here