Falcon Minerals Corporation

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while COP trades at $123.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check COP's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CNQ trades at $46.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CNQ's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EOG trades at $135.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EOG's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PXD's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OXY trades at $58.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OXY's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while FANG trades at $197.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check FANG's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check HES's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while WDS trades at $23.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check WDS's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EQT trades at $59.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EQT's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OXY-WT trades at $36.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OXY-WT's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TPL trades at $436.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TPL's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while DVN trades at $49.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check DVN's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CTRA trades at $34.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CTRA's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EXE trades at $97.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EXE's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check COG's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OVV trades at $57.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OVV's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MRO's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PR trades at $20.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while APA trades at $38.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check APA's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while AR trades at $38.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check AR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHK's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while RRC trades at $42.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check RRC's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHKEW's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHKEZ's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHKEL's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SWN's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHRD trades at $138.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 185.95. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHRD's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MTDR trades at $61.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MTDR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VIST trades at $73.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VIST's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CEO's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CRC trades at $65.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CRC's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MUR trades at $40.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 54.67. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MUR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CNX trades at $39.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CNX's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MGY trades at $29.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MGY's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CPG's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CRK trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CRK's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OAS's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check DEN's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BCEI's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CRGY trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CRGY's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CDEV's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check ERF's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VRN's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BTE trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BTE's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GPOR trades at $191.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GPOR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SM trades at $29.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SM's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BKV trades at $29.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BKV's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BSM trades at $14.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BSM's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check ESTE's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while NOG trades at $27.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 68.91. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check NOG's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CLMT trades at $30.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -78.79. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CLMT's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TALO trades at $15.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TALO's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CPE's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CIVI trades at $27.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CIVI's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MNR trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MNR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check STRDW's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VET trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VET's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while NEXT trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check NEXT's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check HHRS's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while KOS trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check KOS's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while KRP trades at $14.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check KRP's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while DMLP trades at $28.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check DMLP's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SBR trades at $76.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SBR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SBOW's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TELL's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 892.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while IMPPP trades at $25.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.97. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check IMPPP's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 878.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OBE trades at $13.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 36.26. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OBE's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 811.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TBN trades at $35.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TBN's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 799.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while HPK trades at $6.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 48.69. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check HPK's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while REPX trades at $35.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check REPX's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 760.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VTS trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VTS's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 757.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GRNT trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GRNT's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check ROCC's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VTLE trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VTLE's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 675.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TXO trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -28.44. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TXO's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 652.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EGY trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EGY's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PVAC's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 562.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SD trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SD's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 560.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while WTI trades at $4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check WTI's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 476.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GPRK trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GPRK's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GFR trades at $6.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GFR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 352.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PNRG trades at $217.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PNRG's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 327.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while REI trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check REI's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 311.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GTE trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GTE's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BRY trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BRY's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 248M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while AMPY trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check AMPY's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while INR trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INR's ROE of +37.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check INR's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while KGEI trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check KGEI's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 196.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SJT trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -422.00. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SJT's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while IMPP trades at $4.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check IMPP's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PHX's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EPM trades at $4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is 58.75. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EPM's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while ANNA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 95.50. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check ANNA's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EPSN trades at $6.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -24.76. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EPSN's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GLND trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GLND's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EP trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EP's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EP's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SAFX trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SAFX's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while NRT trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check NRT's competition here

FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PED trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PED's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PED's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PED's competition here