SilverBow Resources, Inc. (SBOW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SBOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBOW | $36.82 | -2.41% | 940.4M | 4.69 | $7.85 | N/A |
| COP | $118.89 | +1.49% | 144.9B | 20.15 | $5.90 | +2.78% |
| CNQ | $46.29 | +1.29% | 96.6B | 11.93 | $3.88 | +3.75% |
| EOG | $140.15 | +1.72% | 74.7B | 13.78 | $10.17 | +2.88% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $57.48 | +0.96% | 57.2B | 77.68 | $0.74 | +1.70% |
| FANG | $198.20 | +2.90% | 55.8B | 202.24 | $0.98 | +2.09% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $21.68 | +1.64% | 41.1B | 15.27 | $1.42 | +5.17% |
| OXY-WT | $35.56 | +1.95% | 35.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
SBOW vs COP Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while COP trades at $118.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check COP's competition here
SBOW vs CNQ Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CNQ trades at $46.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CNQ's competition here
SBOW vs EOG Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EOG trades at $140.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check EOG's competition here
SBOW vs PXD Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check PXD's competition here
SBOW vs OXY Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OXY trades at $57.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 77.68. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check OXY's competition here
SBOW vs FANG Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while FANG trades at $198.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 202.24. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check FANG's competition here
SBOW vs HES Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check HES's competition here
SBOW vs WDS Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while WDS trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check WDS's competition here
SBOW vs OXY-WT Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OXY-WT trades at $35.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check OXY-WT's competition here
SBOW vs EQT Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EQT trades at $52.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check EQT's competition here
SBOW vs DVN Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while DVN trades at $45.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check DVN's competition here
SBOW vs TPL Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TPL trades at $396.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 54.34. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check TPL's competition here
SBOW vs CTRA Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CTRA's competition here
SBOW vs EXE Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EXE trades at $90.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check EXE's competition here
SBOW vs COG Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check COG's competition here
SBOW vs OVV Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OVV trades at $57.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check OVV's competition here
SBOW vs MRO Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check MRO's competition here
SBOW vs PR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PR trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check PR's competition here
SBOW vs APA Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while APA trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check APA's competition here
SBOW vs AR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while AR trades at $35.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check AR's competition here
SBOW vs CHK Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CHK's competition here
SBOW vs CHKEW Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CHKEW's competition here
SBOW vs RRC Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while RRC trades at $39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check RRC's competition here
SBOW vs CHKEZ Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CHKEZ's competition here
SBOW vs CHKEL Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CHKEL's competition here
SBOW vs SWN Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check SWN's competition here
SBOW vs CHRD Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHRD trades at $138.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -135.56. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CHRD's competition here
SBOW vs SM Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SM trades at $32.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check SM's competition here
SBOW vs VIST Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VIST trades at $73.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check VIST's competition here
SBOW vs MTDR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MTDR trades at $55.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check MTDR's competition here
SBOW vs CEO Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CEO's competition here
SBOW vs MUR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MUR trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 67.80. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check MUR's competition here
SBOW vs CRC Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CRC trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CRC's competition here
SBOW vs CPG Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CPG's competition here
SBOW vs MGY Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MGY trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check MGY's competition here
SBOW vs CNX Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CNX trades at $33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CNX's competition here
SBOW vs OAS Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check OAS's competition here
SBOW vs DEN Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check DEN's competition here
SBOW vs BCEI Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check BCEI's competition here
SBOW vs CDEV Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CDEV's competition here
SBOW vs ERF Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check ERF's competition here
SBOW vs CRGY Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CRGY trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CRGY's competition here
SBOW vs CRK Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CRK trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CRK's competition here
SBOW vs VRN Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check VRN's competition here
SBOW vs BTE Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BTE trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check BTE's competition here
SBOW vs CLMT Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CLMT trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CLMT's competition here
SBOW vs GPOR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GPOR trades at $166.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check GPOR's competition here
SBOW vs ESTE Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check ESTE's competition here
SBOW vs BSM Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BSM trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check BSM's competition here
SBOW vs BKV Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BKV trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check BKV's competition here
SBOW vs TALO Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TALO trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check TALO's competition here
SBOW vs CPE Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CPE's competition here
SBOW vs CIVI Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check CIVI's competition here
SBOW vs MNR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MNR trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check MNR's competition here
SBOW vs NOG Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while NOG trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check NOG's competition here
SBOW vs NEXT Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while NEXT trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check NEXT's competition here
SBOW vs STRDW Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check STRDW's competition here
SBOW vs VET Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VET trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check VET's competition here
SBOW vs KRP Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while KRP trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check KRP's competition here
SBOW vs HHRS Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check HHRS's competition here
SBOW vs KOS Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while KOS trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check KOS's competition here
SBOW vs DMLP Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while DMLP trades at $27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check DMLP's competition here
SBOW vs FLMN Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check FLMN's competition here
SBOW vs SBR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SBR trades at $78.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check SBR's competition here
SBOW vs DEC Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while DEC trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check DEC's competition here
SBOW vs HPK Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 990.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while HPK trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check HPK's competition here
SBOW vs TBN Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 975.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TBN trades at $34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -18.82. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check TBN's competition here
SBOW vs IMPPP Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 964.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while IMPPP trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.46. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check IMPPP's competition here
SBOW vs TELL Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check TELL's competition here
SBOW vs OBE Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 779.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OBE trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1158.00. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check OBE's competition here
SBOW vs REPX Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 776.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while REPX trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check REPX's competition here
SBOW vs TXO Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 754.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TXO trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check TXO's competition here
SBOW vs VTS Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 744.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VTS trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -36.43. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check VTS's competition here
SBOW vs ROCC Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check ROCC's competition here
SBOW vs VTLE Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check VTLE's competition here
SBOW vs GRNT Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 640.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GRNT trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -19.42. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check GRNT's competition here
SBOW vs WTI Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 587.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while WTI trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check WTI's competition here
SBOW vs PVAC Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check PVAC's competition here
SBOW vs EGY Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 577.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EGY trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check EGY's competition here
SBOW vs GPRK Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 564.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GPRK trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check GPRK's competition here
SBOW vs SD Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 558.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SD trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check SD's competition here
SBOW vs GFR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 420.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GFR trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -52.82. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check GFR's competition here
SBOW vs PNRG Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PNRG trades at $189.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check PNRG's competition here
SBOW vs GTE Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GTE trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check GTE's competition here
SBOW vs REI Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 264.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while REI trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check REI's competition here
SBOW vs BRY Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check BRY's competition here
SBOW vs INR Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while INR trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check INR's competition here
SBOW vs IMPP Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while IMPP trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check IMPP's competition here
SBOW vs KGEI Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while KGEI trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check KGEI's competition here
SBOW vs AMPY Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 187.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while AMPY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check AMPY's competition here
SBOW vs SJT Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SJT trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -186.00. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check SJT's competition here
SBOW vs PHX Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check PHX's competition here
SBOW vs EPM Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EPM trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -36.58. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check EPM's competition here
SBOW vs EPSN Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EPSN trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -14.59. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check EPSN's competition here
SBOW vs ANNA Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 124.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while ANNA trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check ANNA's competition here
SBOW vs EP Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EP trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check EP's competition here
SBOW vs SAFX Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SAFX trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check SAFX's competition here
SBOW vs HUSA Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check HUSA's competition here
SBOW vs GLND Comparison June 2026
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.4M. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GLND trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is less volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.Check GLND's competition here