Enerplus Corporation (ERF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERF | $20.09 | +0.66% | 4.1B | 11.22 | $1.79 | +2.40% |
| COP | $103.22 | -0.71% | 125.8B | 17.38 | $5.94 | +3.16% |
| CNQ | $38.92 | -1.48% | 81.2B | 15.15 | $2.57 | +4.42% |
| EOG | $128.59 | -0.88% | 68.5B | 12.01 | $10.71 | +3.09% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| FANG | $171.96 | -2.17% | 48.4B | 14.67 | $11.72 | +2.33% |
| OXY | $47.94 | -1.30% | 47.7B | 19.97 | $2.40 | +2.05% |
| OXY-WT | $25.97 | -2.48% | 47.1B | 8.17 | $3.18 | +2.05% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $19.33 | +0.05% | 36.7B | 13.57 | $1.43 | +5.79% |
Stock Comparison
ERF vs COP Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while COP trades at $103.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check COP's competition here
ERF vs CNQ Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CNQ trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CNQ's competition here
ERF vs EOG Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EOG trades at $128.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EOG's competition here
ERF vs PXD Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PXD's competition here
ERF vs FANG Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while FANG trades at $171.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check FANG's competition here
ERF vs OXY Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OXY trades at $47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OXY's competition here
ERF vs OXY-WT Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OXY-WT trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OXY-WT's competition here
ERF vs HES Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HES's competition here
ERF vs WDS Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WDS trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check WDS's competition here
ERF vs EQT Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EQT trades at $52.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF and EQT have similar daily volatility (1.76).Check EQT's competition here
ERF vs TPL Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TPL trades at $415.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 56.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TPL's competition here
ERF vs DVN Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DVN trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DVN's competition here
ERF vs CTRA Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CTRA's competition here
ERF vs EXE Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EXE trades at $89.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EXE's competition here
ERF vs COG Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check COG's competition here
ERF vs MRO Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MRO's competition here
ERF vs OVV Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OVV trades at $51.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OVV's competition here
ERF vs PR Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PR trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PR's competition here
ERF vs APA Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while APA trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check APA's competition here
ERF vs AR Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while AR trades at $34.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check AR's competition here
ERF vs CHK Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHK's competition here
ERF vs CHKEW Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEW's competition here
ERF vs RRC Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while RRC trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check RRC's competition here
ERF vs CHKEZ Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEZ's competition here
ERF vs CHKEL Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEL's competition here
ERF vs SWN Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SWN's competition here
ERF vs VIST Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VIST trades at $62.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VIST's competition here
ERF vs CHRD Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHRD trades at $111.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHRD's competition here
ERF vs SM Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SM trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SM's competition here
ERF vs MTDR Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MTDR trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MTDR's competition here
ERF vs CEO Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CEO's competition here
ERF vs CPG Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CPG's competition here
ERF vs CNX Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CNX trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CNX's competition here
ERF vs MGY Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MGY trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MGY's competition here
ERF vs CRC Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRC trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRC's competition here
ERF vs OAS Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OAS's competition here
ERF vs MUR Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MUR trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MUR's competition here
ERF vs DEN Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DEN's competition here
ERF vs BCEI Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BCEI's competition here
ERF vs CRK Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRK trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRK's competition here
ERF vs CDEV Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CDEV's competition here
ERF vs VRN Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VRN's competition here
ERF vs CRGY Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRGY trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRGY's competition here
ERF vs ESTE Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check ESTE's competition here
ERF vs BKV Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BKV trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BKV's competition here
ERF vs GPOR Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GPOR trades at $165.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GPOR's competition here
ERF vs BSM Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BSM trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BSM's competition here
ERF vs BTE Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BTE trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -18.32. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BTE's competition here
ERF vs CPE Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CPE's competition here
ERF vs CIVI Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CIVI's competition here
ERF vs TALO Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TALO trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TALO's competition here
ERF vs MNR Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MNR trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MNR's competition here
ERF vs STRDW Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check STRDW's competition here
ERF vs NOG Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NOG trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check NOG's competition here
ERF vs HHRS Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HHRS's competition here
ERF vs KRP Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KRP trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KRP's competition here
ERF vs VET Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VET trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -34.92. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VET's competition here
ERF vs DMLP Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DMLP trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DMLP's competition here
ERF vs FLMN Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check FLMN's competition here
ERF vs SBR Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SBR trades at $72.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SBR's competition here
ERF vs KOS Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 982.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KOS trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KOS's competition here
ERF vs DEC Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 981.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DEC trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DEC's competition here
ERF vs SBOW Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SBOW's competition here
ERF vs TELL Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TELL's competition here
ERF vs TBN Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 883.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TBN trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TBN's competition here
ERF vs HPK Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 841.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HPK trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -66.60. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HPK's competition here
ERF vs ROCC Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check ROCC's competition here
ERF vs REPX Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 701.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while REPX trades at $32.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check REPX's competition here
ERF vs VTLE Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VTLE's competition here
ERF vs TXO Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 685.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TXO trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TXO's competition here
ERF vs VTS Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 656.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VTS trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VTS's competition here
ERF vs WHK Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHK has a market cap of 610.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WHK trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WHK's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WHK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to WHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check WHK's competition here
ERF vs PVAC Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PVAC's competition here
ERF vs GRNT Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 576M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GRNT trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GRNT's competition here
ERF vs OBE Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 535.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OBE trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -795.00. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OBE's competition here
ERF vs EGY Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 517.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EGY trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -9.02. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EGY's competition here
ERF vs SD Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 495.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SD trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SD's competition here
ERF vs GPRK Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 475.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GPRK trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GPRK's competition here
ERF vs WTI Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 455.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WTI trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check WTI's competition here
ERF vs GFR Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 406.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GFR trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -62.44. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GFR's competition here
ERF vs PNRG Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PNRG trades at $170.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PNRG's competition here
ERF vs BRY Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BRY's competition here
ERF vs REI Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 226.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while REI trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check REI's competition here
ERF vs GTE Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GTE trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GTE's competition here
ERF vs IMPPP Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while IMPPP trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check IMPPP's competition here
ERF vs IMPP Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while IMPP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check IMPP's competition here
ERF vs KGEI Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 165.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KGEI trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KGEI's competition here
ERF vs PHX Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PHX's competition here
ERF vs AMPY Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while AMPY trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check AMPY's competition here
ERF vs SJT Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SJT trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -133.87. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SJT's competition here
ERF vs EPSN Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EPSN trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EPSN's competition here
ERF vs EPM Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EPM trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -634.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EPM's competition here
ERF vs ANNA Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ANNA trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check ANNA's competition here
ERF vs EP Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EP trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EP's competition here
ERF vs SAFX Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SAFX trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SAFX's competition here
ERF vs HUSA Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HUSA's competition here
ERF vs NRT Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NRT trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NRT's ROE of +4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check NRT's competition here
ERF vs PED Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PED trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PED's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PED's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PED's competition here
ERF vs BSIN Comparison July 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BSIN has a market cap of 56.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BSIN trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BSIN's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BSIN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BSIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BSIN's competition here