Empire Petroleum Corporation

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 149.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while COP trades at $122.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check COP's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CNQ trades at $47.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CNQ's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while EOG trades at $140.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check EOG's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check PXD's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while OXY trades at $59.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 80.57. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check OXY's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while FANG trades at $203.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 207.71. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check FANG's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check HES's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while WDS trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check WDS's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while OXY-WT trades at $37.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check OXY-WT's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while EQT trades at $56.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check EQT's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while DVN trades at $49.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check DVN's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while TPL trades at $385.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 52.69. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check TPL's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CTRA trades at $32.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CTRA's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while EXE trades at $96.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check EXE's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check COG's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while OVV trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check OVV's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check MRO's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while PR trades at $20.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check PR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while APA trades at $38.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check APA's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while AR trades at $38.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check AR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CHK's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while RRC trades at $42.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check RRC's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CHKEW's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CHKEZ's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CHRD trades at $148.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -144.07. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CHRD's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CHKEL's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check SWN's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while VIST trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check VIST's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while MTDR trades at $60.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check MTDR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CEO's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while MUR trades at $40.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 68.88. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check MUR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while MGY trades at $29.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check MGY's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CRC trades at $61.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CRC's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CPG's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CNX trades at $36.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CNX's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check OAS's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check DEN's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check BCEI's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CRK trades at $14.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CRK's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CRGY trades at $13.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -17.85. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CRGY's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CDEV's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check ERF's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while BTE trades at $5.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check BTE's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while SM trades at $32.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check SM's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check VRN's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while GPOR trades at $182.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check GPOR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while BKV trades at $28.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check BKV's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while BSM trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check BSM's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check ESTE's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CLMT trades at $31.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CLMT's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while TALO trades at $16.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check TALO's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while NOG trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check NOG's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while MNR trades at $14.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check MNR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while NEXT trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check NEXT's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CPE's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while CIVI trades at $27.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check CIVI's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while VET trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check VET's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check STRDW's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while KOS trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check KOS's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check HHRS's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while KRP trades at $15.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check KRP's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while DMLP trades at $27.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check DMLP's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check FLMN's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while DEC trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check DEC's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while SBR trades at $77.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check SBR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while TBN trades at $36.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -19.89. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check TBN's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check SBOW's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 904.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while OBE trades at $13.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1344.00. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check OBE's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while HPK trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check HPK's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check TELL's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 892.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while IMPPP trades at $26.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -66.01. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check IMPPP's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 802.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while REPX trades at $36.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check REPX's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 772.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while VTS trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -37.78. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check VTS's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 726.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while GRNT trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -22.02. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check GRNT's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 722M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while TXO trades at $13.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check TXO's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check ROCC's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 705.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while WTI trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check WTI's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while VTLE trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check VTLE's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 621.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while EGY trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check EGY's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check PVAC's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 563.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while SD trades at $15.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check SD's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while GPRK trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check GPRK's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 446.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while GFR trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -56.09. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check GFR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 433.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while PNRG trades at $268.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check PNRG's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 324.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while GTE trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check GTE's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 283.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while REI trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check REI's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while BRY trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check BRY's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while INR trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check INR's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 216.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while KGEI trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check KGEI's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while AMPY trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check AMPY's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while SJT trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -414.00. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check SJT's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while IMPP trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check IMPP's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while EPM trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -38.75. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check EPM's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check PHX's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while EPSN trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check EPSN's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while ANNA trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 85.75. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check ANNA's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, RISE has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while RISE trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas RISE's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to RISE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to RISE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check RISE's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while SAFX trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check SAFX's competition here

EP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EP stands at 96.5M. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EP is priced at $2.61, while GLND trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP's ROE is -2.78%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP is more volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP.Check GLND's competition here