EQT Corporation (EQT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EQT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQT | $52.70 | +2.03% | 33B | 12.56 | $4.20 | +1.24% |
| COP | $105.96 | -0.42% | 128.9B | 17.81 | $5.94 | +3.15% |
| CNQ | $39.49 | -0.28% | 82.4B | 15.37 | $2.57 | +4.41% |
| EOG | $132.60 | -0.74% | 70.6B | 12.38 | $10.71 | +3.05% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| FANG | $179.91 | -1.45% | 50.6B | 15.34 | $11.72 | +2.31% |
| OXY | $49.99 | -2.38% | 49.7B | 20.83 | $2.40 | +2.00% |
| OXY-WT | $28.06 | -4.26% | 48.7B | 8.81 | $3.18 | +2.00% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $18.94 | -0.63% | 35.9B | 13.29 | $1.43 | +5.94% |
Stock Comparison
EQT vs COP Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 128.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while COP trades at $105.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check COP's competition here
EQT vs CNQ Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CNQ trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CNQ's competition here
EQT vs EOG Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while EOG trades at $132.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EOG's competition here
EQT vs PXD Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PXD's competition here
EQT vs FANG Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while FANG trades at $179.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check FANG's competition here
EQT vs OXY Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while OXY trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OXY's competition here
EQT vs OXY-WT Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while OXY-WT trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OXY-WT's competition here
EQT vs HES Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HES's competition here
EQT vs WDS Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while WDS trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check WDS's competition here
EQT vs TPL Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while TPL trades at $395.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 54.25. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TPL's competition here
EQT vs DVN Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while DVN trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DVN's competition here
EQT vs CTRA Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CTRA's competition here
EQT vs EXE Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while EXE trades at $88.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EXE's competition here
EQT vs COG Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check COG's competition here
EQT vs MRO Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MRO's competition here
EQT vs OVV Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while OVV trades at $53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OVV's competition here
EQT vs PR Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while PR trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PR's competition here
EQT vs APA Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while APA trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check APA's competition here
EQT vs AR Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while AR trades at $35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check AR's competition here
EQT vs CHK Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHK's competition here
EQT vs CHKEW Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEW's competition here
EQT vs RRC Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while RRC trades at $37.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check RRC's competition here
EQT vs CHKEZ Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEZ's competition here
EQT vs CHKEL Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEL's competition here
EQT vs SWN Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SWN's competition here
EQT vs VIST Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while VIST trades at $64.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VIST's competition here
EQT vs CHRD Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CHRD trades at $116.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHRD's competition here
EQT vs SM Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while SM trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SM's competition here
EQT vs MTDR Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while MTDR trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MTDR's competition here
EQT vs CEO Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CEO's competition here
EQT vs CPG Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CPG's competition here
EQT vs MUR Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while MUR trades at $34.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MUR's competition here
EQT vs MGY Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while MGY trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MGY's competition here
EQT vs CNX Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CNX trades at $33.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CNX's competition here
EQT vs CRC Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CRC trades at $53.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRC's competition here
EQT vs OAS Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OAS's competition here
EQT vs DEN Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DEN's competition here
EQT vs BCEI Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BCEI's competition here
EQT vs CRK Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CRK trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRK's competition here
EQT vs CDEV Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CDEV's competition here
EQT vs ERF Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ERF's competition here
EQT vs VRN Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VRN's competition here
EQT vs CRGY Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CRGY trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRGY's competition here
EQT vs BSM Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while BSM trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BSM's competition here
EQT vs ESTE Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ESTE's competition here
EQT vs GPOR Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while GPOR trades at $162.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GPOR's competition here
EQT vs BTE Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while BTE trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BTE's competition here
EQT vs BKV Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while BKV trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BKV's competition here
EQT vs CPE Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CPE's competition here
EQT vs CIVI Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CIVI's competition here
EQT vs TALO Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while TALO trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TALO's competition here
EQT vs MNR Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while MNR trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MNR's competition here
EQT vs NOG Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while NOG trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check NOG's competition here
EQT vs STRDW Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check STRDW's competition here
EQT vs HHRS Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HHRS's competition here
EQT vs KRP Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while KRP trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KRP's competition here
EQT vs VET Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while VET trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VET's competition here
EQT vs DMLP Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while DMLP trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DMLP's competition here
EQT vs FLMN Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check FLMN's competition here
EQT vs SBR Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while SBR trades at $73.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SBR's competition here
EQT vs KOS Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while KOS trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KOS's competition here
EQT vs SBOW Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SBOW's competition here
EQT vs DEC Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 936.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while DEC trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DEC's competition here
EQT vs TBN Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 906.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while TBN trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -17.69. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TBN's competition here
EQT vs TELL Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TELL's competition here
EQT vs HPK Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 858M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while HPK trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -67.90. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HPK's competition here
EQT vs REPX Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 730.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while REPX trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check REPX's competition here
EQT vs ROCC Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ROCC's competition here
EQT vs VTLE Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VTLE's competition here
EQT vs TXO Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while TXO trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TXO's competition here
EQT vs VTS Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while VTS trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VTS's competition here
EQT vs WHK Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, WHK has a market cap of 598M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while WHK trades at $26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas WHK's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to WHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check WHK's competition here
EQT vs GRNT Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 596.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while GRNT trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GRNT's competition here
EQT vs PVAC Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PVAC's competition here
EQT vs OBE Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 546.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while OBE trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -812.50. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OBE's competition here
EQT vs EGY Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 514M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while EGY trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EGY's competition here
EQT vs SD Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 499.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while SD trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SD's competition here
EQT vs GPRK Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 484.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while GPRK trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GPRK's competition here
EQT vs WTI Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 476.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while WTI trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check WTI's competition here
EQT vs GFR Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 408.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while GFR trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -62.72. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GFR's competition here
EQT vs PNRG Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while PNRG trades at $174.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PNRG's competition here
EQT vs BRY Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BRY's competition here
EQT vs REI Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 221.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while REI trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check REI's competition here
EQT vs GTE Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while GTE trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GTE's competition here
EQT vs IMPPP Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while IMPPP trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check IMPPP's competition here
EQT vs IMPP Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while IMPP trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check IMPP's competition here
EQT vs PHX Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PHX's competition here
EQT vs KGEI Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 163.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while KGEI trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KGEI's competition here
EQT vs AMPY Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while AMPY trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check AMPY's competition here
EQT vs SJT Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 140.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while SJT trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -126.90. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SJT's competition here
EQT vs EPM Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while EPM trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -663.48. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EPM's competition here
EQT vs EPSN Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while EPSN trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EPSN's competition here
EQT vs ANNA Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while ANNA trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ANNA's competition here
EQT vs EP Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while EP trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EP's competition here
EQT vs SAFX Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while SAFX trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SAFX's competition here
EQT vs PED Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while PED trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PED's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PED's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PED's competition here
EQT vs HUSA Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HUSA's competition here
EQT vs NRT Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while NRT trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRT's ROE of +4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check NRT's competition here
EQT vs GLND Comparison July 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33B. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $52.70, while GLND trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is -62.50. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GLND's competition here