Vitesse Energy, Inc.
Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTS | $18.36 | -0.73% | 766.7M | -37.51 | -$0.49 | +11.56% |
| COP | $124.54 | +1.74% | 151.7B | 21.11 | $5.90 | +2.65% |
| CNQ | $48.95 | +2.02% | 102.1B | 12.03 | $4.07 | +3.57% |
| EOG | $142.99 | +1.95% | 76.2B | 14.06 | $10.17 | +2.82% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $59.70 | +0.13% | 59.4B | 80.68 | $0.74 | +1.64% |
| FANG | $205.62 | +1.01% | 57.8B | 209.82 | $0.98 | +2.02% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $23.09 | +0.48% | 43.8B | 16.25 | $1.42 | +4.84% |
| OXY-WT | $37.69 | +0.27% | 37.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
VTS vs COP Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while COP trades at $124.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check COP's competition here
VTS vs CNQ Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CNQ trades at $48.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CNQ's competition here
VTS vs EOG Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while EOG trades at $142.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EOG's competition here
VTS vs PXD Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PXD's competition here
VTS vs OXY Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while OXY trades at $59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 80.68. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OXY's competition here
VTS vs FANG Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while FANG trades at $205.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 209.82. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check FANG's competition here
VTS vs HES Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check HES's competition here
VTS vs WDS Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while WDS trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check WDS's competition here
VTS vs OXY-WT Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while OXY-WT trades at $37.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OXY-WT's competition here
VTS vs EQT Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while EQT trades at $57.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EQT's competition here
VTS vs DVN Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while DVN trades at $49.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check DVN's competition here
VTS vs TPL Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while TPL trades at $386.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 53.11. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TPL's competition here
VTS vs CTRA Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CTRA's competition here
VTS vs EXE Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while EXE trades at $98.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EXE's competition here
VTS vs COG Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check COG's competition here
VTS vs OVV Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while OVV trades at $60.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OVV's competition here
VTS vs MRO Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MRO's competition here
VTS vs PR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while PR trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PR's competition here
VTS vs APA Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while APA trades at $40.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check APA's competition here
VTS vs AR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while AR trades at $38.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check AR's competition here
VTS vs CHK Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHK's competition here
VTS vs RRC Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while RRC trades at $42.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check RRC's competition here
VTS vs CHKEW Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHKEW's competition here
VTS vs CHRD Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CHRD trades at $149.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -146.63. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHRD's competition here
VTS vs CHKEZ Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHKEZ's competition here
VTS vs CHKEL Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHKEL's competition here
VTS vs VIST Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while VIST trades at $78.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check VIST's competition here
VTS vs SWN Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SWN's competition here
VTS vs MTDR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while MTDR trades at $60.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MTDR's competition here
VTS vs CEO Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CEO's competition here
VTS vs MUR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while MUR trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 68.53. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MUR's competition here
VTS vs CRC Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CRC trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CRC's competition here
VTS vs MGY Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while MGY trades at $29.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MGY's competition here
VTS vs CPG Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CPG's competition here
VTS vs CNX Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CNX trades at $36.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CNX's competition here
VTS vs OAS Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OAS's competition here
VTS vs DEN Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check DEN's competition here
VTS vs CRGY Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CRGY trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -18.45. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CRGY's competition here
VTS vs BCEI Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BCEI's competition here
VTS vs CRK Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CRK trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CRK's competition here
VTS vs CDEV Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CDEV's competition here
VTS vs ERF Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check ERF's competition here
VTS vs BTE Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while BTE trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -16.06. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BTE's competition here
VTS vs SM Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while SM trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SM's competition here
VTS vs VRN Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check VRN's competition here
VTS vs GPOR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while GPOR trades at $184.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GPOR's competition here
VTS vs BKV Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while BKV trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BKV's competition here
VTS vs BSM Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while BSM trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BSM's competition here
VTS vs ESTE Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check ESTE's competition here
VTS vs CLMT Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CLMT trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -14.98. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CLMT's competition here
VTS vs TALO Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while TALO trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TALO's competition here
VTS vs NOG Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while NOG trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check NOG's competition here
VTS vs MNR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while MNR trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MNR's competition here
VTS vs CPE Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CPE's competition here
VTS vs CIVI Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CIVI's competition here
VTS vs NEXT Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while NEXT trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check NEXT's competition here
VTS vs VET Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while VET trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check VET's competition here
VTS vs STRDW Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check STRDW's competition here
VTS vs KOS Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while KOS trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check KOS's competition here
VTS vs HHRS Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check HHRS's competition here
VTS vs KRP Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while KRP trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check KRP's competition here
VTS vs DMLP Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while DMLP trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check DMLP's competition here
VTS vs FLMN Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check FLMN's competition here
VTS vs DEC Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while DEC trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check DEC's competition here
VTS vs SBR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while SBR trades at $77.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SBR's competition here
VTS vs TBN Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while TBN trades at $36.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -20.10. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TBN's competition here
VTS vs HPK Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 952.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while HPK trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check HPK's competition here
VTS vs SBOW Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SBOW's competition here
VTS vs OBE Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 927.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while OBE trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1378.00. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OBE's competition here
VTS vs IMPPP Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 897M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while IMPPP trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -66.33. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check IMPPP's competition here
VTS vs TELL Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TELL's competition here
VTS vs REPX Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 819.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while REPX trades at $37.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check REPX's competition here
VTS vs TXO Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 749.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while TXO trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TXO's competition here
VTS vs WTI Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 731.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while WTI trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check WTI's competition here
VTS vs GRNT Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 723.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while GRNT trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -21.94. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GRNT's competition here
VTS vs ROCC Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check ROCC's competition here
VTS vs VTLE Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check VTLE's competition here
VTS vs EGY Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 632.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while EGY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EGY's competition here
VTS vs PVAC Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PVAC's competition here
VTS vs SD Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 565.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while SD trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SD's competition here
VTS vs GPRK Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 545.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while GPRK trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GPRK's competition here
VTS vs GFR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 456.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while GFR trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -57.36. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GFR's competition here
VTS vs PNRG Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 441.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while PNRG trades at $272.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PNRG's competition here
VTS vs GTE Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 334.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while GTE trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GTE's competition here
VTS vs REI Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 282.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while REI trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check REI's competition here
VTS vs BRY Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BRY's competition here
VTS vs INR Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 246M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while INR trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check INR's competition here
VTS vs KGEI Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 230.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while KGEI trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check KGEI's competition here
VTS vs AMPY Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 216.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while AMPY trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check AMPY's competition here
VTS vs SJT Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while SJT trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -433.00. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SJT's competition here
VTS vs IMPP Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 175.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while IMPP trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check IMPP's competition here
VTS vs EPM Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 167.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while EPM trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -39.04. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EPM's competition here
VTS vs PHX Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PHX's competition here
VTS vs EPSN Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 160.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while EPSN trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -15.59. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EPSN's competition here
VTS vs ANNA Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while ANNA trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 89.75. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check ANNA's competition here
VTS vs RISE Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, RISE has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while RISE trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas RISE's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RISE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to RISE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check RISE's competition here
VTS vs EP Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while EP trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EP's competition here
VTS vs SAFX Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while SAFX trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SAFX's competition here
VTS vs GLND Comparison May 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 766.7M. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $18.36, while GLND trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.51, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GLND's competition here